Topic profile page for Cosmological.
This page has aggregated data from forum posts, threads, listings, online discussions, newsgroups, messageboards, and other online sources which contain user generated content for the term: Cosmological.
Topic "Cosmological" was discussed 0 times on 0 sites in last 3 months
More cosmological poetry: "soft gamma repeater... More cosmological poetry: "soft gamma repeater magnetars" have mag field 100tr x stronger than earth http://bit.ly/14hXwl via @ dailygalaxy 11:36 AM Aug 4th from TweetDeck
Started 6 days ago (2009-12-20 06:48:59)
by montyfowler
I've been away for a while. But let's tread some ground we haven't trod in a while. Let's consider perhaps the most basic argument for a Creator. The Kalam Cosmological Argument 1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause. 2. The universe began to exist. 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause. Let the debate begin!
Started 3 weeks, 4 days ago (2009-11-30 16:48:00)
by FluffyFriend
where unit conventions of general relativity are used (otherwise factors of G and c would also appear). It is common to quote values of energy density directly, though still using the name "cosmological constant". What does this paragraph mean? I ...
Started 3 weeks, 6 days ago (2009-11-28 19:15:00)
by midasvuik
I have examined both the Leibnizian and Thomistic Cosmological Arguments, but how are they really different? WLC seems to be making a distinction between them that is rather vague. Could anyone here explain it in further detail?
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2009-11-17 10:49:00)
by Baracks_Statist_Utopia
Intriguing. Yea or Nay? http://www.starlarvae.org/Star_Larvae_Cosmological _Natural_Selection.html Spearheaded by physicist Lee Smolin, who lays out the idea in his book, " The Life of the Cosmos ", this Darwinian cosmogony assigns to universes a capacity to reproduce. It proposes a multigenerational ensemble of universes. In the Darwinian analogy ...
Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago (2009-10-30 10:03:00)
by lauren.s...
I understand the versions of the cosmological argument, just we done all of the criticisms in one lesson, and rushed its confusing me to the point of frustration, anyone who could help with this would be awesome, thank you! :)
Started 5 days, 15 hours ago (2009-12-20 15:14:00)
by pywakit
An Open Letter To All Scientists ... I am writing to you because the science community does not make allowances for innovation, or insights from a layperson. ( non-theist version ) It's not my desire to annoy you, or waste your time. But it is my hope that in the spirit of open-mindedness, you might take a few minutes to read the following. It seems impossible to separate ego ( I have ...
Started 5 days, 16 hours ago (2009-12-20 14:57:00)
by pywakit
Ok. I guess this is where I was supposed to do this ... The following is an 'open' letter to cosmologists, astrophysicists, or any other science-minded individual. Tear it apart. And Good Luck .... I am writing to you because the science community does not make allowances for innovation, or insights from a layperson. ( non-theist version ) It's not my desire to annoy you, or waste ...
Started 5 days, 9 hours ago (2009-12-20 21:03:00)
by pywakit
Quote: Originally Posted by HUGGY Quote: Originally Posted by pywakit Ok. I guess this is where I was supposed to do this ... The following is an 'open' letter to cosmologists, astrophysicists, or any other science-minded individual. Tear it apart. And Good Luck .... I am writing to you because the science community does not make allowances ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-17 22:06:00)
by diegoviz
advertising David Bohm proposed a cosmological order radically different from generally accepted conventions, which he expressed as a distinction between the implicate and explicate order, described in the book Wholeness and the Implicate Order: In the enfolded [or implicate] order, space and time are no longer the dominant factors determining the ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-17 12:34:00)
by jpprieto
Hi everyone. I'm installing the mpgrafic code in order to create large cosmological initial conditions. I start with ./configure and the reply is ... checking for Fortran libraries of mpif90... -L/usr/local/lib -lmpichf90 -lmpich -lpthread -lrt -L/opt/intel/fce/10.0.023/lib -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/ -L/usr/lib64 -lifport -lifcore -limf -lsvml -lm -lipgo -lirc -lirc_s -ldl ...
Started 2 days, 9 hours ago (2009-12-23 21:48:34)
by FreedomSlave74
24beforemylove wrote: No offence taken, FS! I'm happy to plug away in the natural world and assume that things can be explained without recourse to other domains. I was talking yesterday to a friend in our band who did his degree in physics and he was of the view that phycisists themselves barely understand what they are talking about when they get into quantum theory, black holes...
Started 4 days, 15 hours ago (2009-12-21 15:36:00)
by Buho
1. Everything that begins to exist must have a cause. 2. The universe began to exist. 3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause. Premise one seems reasonable to most: it is the most well-established scientific law known: the law of cause and effect. Premise two seems reasonable to most as well: the Big Bang seems to suggest the universe does indeed have a beginning. The ...
Started 3 days, 9 hours ago (2009-12-22 21:01:00)
by GIBHOR
Originally Posted by KingMerv00 Regarding the bolded part...why MUST a first cause be self-aware? http://www.letusreason.org/apolo3.htm Gods perspective- Science ultimately cannot explain the Universes beginnings because it cannot go that far back. Science can only explain what is here now and even that is speculative since we ...
Started 6 days, 9 hours ago (2009-12-19 21:02:00)
by born dead
Tatsudoshi wrote: born dead wrote: Tatsudoshi wrote: born dead wrote: Tatsudoshi wrote: born dead wrote: Tatsudoshi wrote: born dead wrote: Tatsudoshi wrote: born dead wrote: A basic problem is that there is no universally accepted definition of God or existence....
Started 2 days, 17 hours ago (2009-12-23 13:54:00)
by View Public Profile
Originally Posted by quantum_wave OK, so the energy coming out of mass in the 5th and 6th dimensions is always in a constant relationship to the energy of the electromagnetic disturbance called a particle from which it is generated? It can be thought of as quantum in that the 5th and 6th dimensional 90 degree ...
