photo nuts wrote: > is not any better than what one can get from a much cheaper 7D Look at the EXIF: 400mm, f2.8, 1/160. Not sure if IS was used, but you can definitely see how there is shallow
DOF in that shot making it seem like it lacks detail but that's because of the DOF. And camera shake cannot be ruled out. The iso 1600 shot: 200mm 1/200, f2.8 is unsharp, lacks details. My 5D at ...