Topic profile page for CPUID.
This page has aggregated data from forum posts, threads, listings, online discussions, newsgroups, messageboards, and other online sources which contain user generated content for the term: CPUID.
Topic "Cpuid" was discussed 0 times on 0 sites in last 3 months
Started 1 week, 6 days ago (2009-12-08 02:37:00)
by Xstatic
For some reason Real Temp, Cpuid and CPU-Z all show 2 cores 4 threads. I don't see anything in bios that is turned off but maybe I'm missing something? Rig in sig.
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2009-11-06 19:29:00)
by 20mmrain
Has anyone else had this same experience. They will be testing an overclock with Prime95 or Intel Burn and they also have CPUID HWM open to monitor temps. When watching the CPUID HWM for a split second my CPU or NB temps will go up to 76C and then go right back down to where they were before. I've been meaning to ask this question for awhile because I believe it's just a glitch but I'm just ...
Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago (2009-10-29 07:38:00)
by virendra
Hi guys, Cpuid has released a new tool called TMonitor. TMonitor is aimed to display the active clock of each individual core of Intel Core 2 and Core i3/i5/i7 processors. A very high refresh rate (20 times per second) allows to visualize the smallest clock variation in real time. TMonitor is able to detect mechanism such as Intel Turbo boost, and therefore ...
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2009-10-14 23:46:00)
by ananda vardhana
I need to get all the flags a __cpuid() instrcution would provide in c#. I tried Method 1: ManagementObjectSearcher searcher = new ManagementObjectSearcher("select * from Win32_Processor"); This has everything under the sun except getting all the cpu flags. I was in particularly looking to is if the VMX bit is set or not. However I do need all the other cpu flags also. Then I thought I ...
Started 1 month ago (2009-11-17 02:22:00)
by حبوبي
[img]http://pwimage.org/images/4jab4cv2h90zu3scbt8 .png [/img] PUID HWMonitor Pro is the extended version of the hardware monitoring program HWMonitor. HWMonitor is a hardware monitoring application that reads PC systems main health sensors: temperatures, voltages, fans speed. In comparison to its classic counterpart, HWMonitor Pro adds the following features : ...
Started 1 month ago (2009-11-15 13:30:00)
by Farwalker
Since heat can be a serious issue in overclocking a CPU, I would like to know which of the two applications is more accurate. Heat generated by my CPU is now my main focus. I am cooling with air Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme Rev C. Room temps are around 73/23 - 76F/24C. Of course my cooling does much better when I open the window at night and let 50F/10C air flow into ...
Started 2 days, 17 hours ago (2009-12-18 14:02:00)
by xploda
Hello! I am writing little application similar to CPUID, which have to determine some CPU parameters. I made most of it, but having problems with getting CPU codename, socket type and CPU family. I tried with WMI and SocketDesignation from Win32_Processor class, but instead of socket string I am getting CPU1. I think it's because I am running 64-bit dual-core Intel on 32-bit Vista, but I am not...
Started 4 days, 14 hours ago (2009-12-16 17:32:37)
by fastpathguru
[quote]that, after the fact, the code can be shown to run as well or better on the other vendors' cpu when the cpuid string is changed does nothing to negate the fact that validation costs time and money. money which is at intel's complete discretion to spend or not. [/quote] In fact, Intel has no responsibility to validate ICC's output on any non-Intel processor. It's the non-Intel-processor ...
Started 4 days, 8 hours ago (2009-12-16 23:37:35)
by Elmer Phud
[i]X86 is X86. If AMD's chips can't run valid X86 code, Intel marketing gets to go to town on them, legitimately. Fact is though, the benches not only run perfectly well, but get the expected performance boosts from the optimized code paths when the CPUID is fudged.[/i] You are remarkably ignorant on this topic and should stop embarrassing yourself.
Started 4 days, 7 hours ago (2009-12-17 00:45:10)
by chipguy
[i]X86 is X86.[/i] Stupid claim. Do you remember how x86 asm programmers discerned what processor their code was running on before CPUID and ISA extensions? According to you what they did was impossible. [i]If AMD's chips can't run valid X86 code[/i] AMD chips are usually a generation behind Intel chips in their ability to run *valid* x86 code. Anyway, valid code is not the issue of the complaint...
Started 4 days, 7 hours ago (2009-12-17 00:09:55)
by fastpathguru
[quote][quote]X86 is X86. If AMD's chips can't run valid X86 code, Intel marketing gets to go to town on them, legitimately. Fact is though, the benches not only run perfectly well, but get the expected performance boosts from the optimized code paths when the CPUID is fudged.[/quote] You are remarkably ignorant on this topic and should stop embarrassing yourself. [/quote] Nothing but ad hom. ...
Started 3 days, 15 hours ago (2009-12-17 16:05:00)
by Elmer Phud
[i]Unbelievably risky for Intel, since "writing a compiler for AMD and Via" is as simple as eliminating the CPUID check from ICC.[/i] You have no way of knowing this but that's nothing new. Woooooosssshhhhhhhhhhh......
