Thread: ubuntu 9.1

Quote: Originally Posted by timmyw3ar So nothing about this release is "edgy"? Fedora12 will also use Grub2 right? i think Fedora11 an 12 has a Grub2 test build in it but it isnt installed by default. F13 may use Grub2 but there is not concreate feature list for F13 yet to support Grub2 in it. Quote: Originally Posted by Nokia Erm, actually no. It seems F12 has a patched grub-legacy Code: grub-0.97-60.fc12.i686 was patched...

Quote: Originally Posted by troyatlarge I did run across one issue while loading OS's. So systems loaded and had no option about flashing the MBR with the new installed grub, they simply do it - thus instead of booting from the boot partition, it boots up from, say sda7. When that happens I have a need to re-flash the MBR with the grub on the boot partition (the one shown above) - how does one do that? (I still have several distros to...

Thanks bob

@droidhacker, best laugh of the day, so far. Yes, numerically 9.1 *is* equal to 9.10, so.....

Quote: Originally Posted by Gödel ubuntu 9.09999999.... , or even Code: ∞ Ubuntu 9 + 𝜮 (9×10^-n) n=2 LMAO!! Now that's a good one!

ubuntu 9.09999999.... , or even Code: ∞ Ubuntu 9 + 𝜮 (9×10^-n) n=2

lol - given that I got a grub load error 22 I'm thinking I best change to a 4!

Title's changed since a lot of good info's in here...also the other kind....

The guy here says there's no need to ever use the command line http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8326264.stm Umm, just booted the Kubuntu LiveCD and there was a loud pop at start-up, I thought the cones on my speakers were going to jump out of the boxes!!!

Quote: Originally Posted by Wayne The guy here says there's no need to ever use the command line Even assuming that's true, I still maintain it's silly to completely jettison use of some of the most powerful shells in the history of... well, the history of computing.