Thread: pick one only, MM or TT

daintrain28 wrote: My fear is that TT hangs onto MM causing them both to be fired after 2010. I think TT is a real gem of a GM who is good at what he does. I think there is more than enough talent on this team to be a contender. The problem is, there not playing hard right now. A new HC is needed and I think that's what will emerge TT as one of the best GMs in all of football. i agree that there's enough in the cupboard here to be a...

Zing wrote: A.J. Hawk Fan wrote: jenkins77 wrote: A.J. Hawk Fan wrote: Keep Theodore. Get rid of Michael. TY. that's what i'm looking to hear, one side or the other. ty. i didn't think it was that hard of a question. Someone has an attitude. You want more in-depth analysis? Why don't you check the 15 other threads that are dedicated to this kind of talk. Almost everyone on this site wants McCarthy gone, and a lot of people...

A.J. Hawk Fan wrote: jenkins77 wrote: A.J. Hawk Fan wrote: Keep Theodore. Get rid of Michael. TY. that's what i'm looking to hear, one side or the other. ty. i didn't think it was that hard of a question. Someone has an attitude. You want more in-depth analysis? Why don't you check the 15 other threads that are dedicated to this kind of talk. Almost everyone on this site wants McCarthy gone, and a lot of people would like...

Wait a minute, this question doesn't even make sense. If you fire Ted and hire a new GM, he is going to get rid of McCarthy anyway...

ManInCharge wrote: I found this in another thread and thought this as good a place to post it as any. Packer fans have been on TT's back since he got here for all his "terrible" picks. While he might not be mining gold out of every pick in every draft, take a look at what Jerry Angelo has been doing...and for 3 extra years, I might add. http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=356701 I think that kind of...

BobSacamano wrote: Deadeye wrote: I think a fire has been lit and the Pack are going to start playing better real soon. Perhaps, but don't you think it would have been lit after two embarrassing loses on national TV to Brent? The fire wasn't lit enough for them to beat the 0-7 bucs. Well, of course the fire should have been lit with Brett returning to GB in Viking purple. But things are dire right now, and that's a tremendous...

jenkins77 wrote: who do you blame more for us being 8-14 over the past 22 games, which is obviously not headed in the right direction, and which is when we have had a remarkable good health record to our top players rodgers, jennings, driver, and woodson)? i mean, if you get to fire just one guy after this crappy season (7-9 or 6-10), which one do you give the ax to? i mean do you think tt hasn't given mccarthy enough to work with to...

Deadeye wrote: I think a fire has been lit and the Pack are going to start playing better real soon. Perhaps, but don't you think it would have been lit after two embarrassing loses on national TV to Brent? The fire wasn't lit enough for them to beat the 0-7 bucs.

I would rather keep TT. Mike has lost this team and we need a change.

Clicked the wrong one. I would much rather keep Thompson over McCarthy.