Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: digital photography taking over!

Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago by 1poorguy
http://www.azcentral.com/community/gilbert/article s/2009/11/... Digital photography is gaining momentum as a form of fine art, say members of Gilbert Visual Art League. <snip> Eighteen of the 80 entries are photographs. I've never been much for paintings. What's the point when you can take a photograph instead? Exception being scenes that don't exist, of course (though with ...
Site: The Motley Fool Discussion Boards  The Motley Fool Discussion Boards - site profile
Forum: Photography  Photography - forum profile
Total authors: 12 authors
Total thread posts: 14 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: fool.com

Other posts in this thread:

TroySR71 replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
I've never been much for paintings. What's the point when you can take a photograph instead? I appreciate Thomas Kinkade's work. Troy

lemoneater replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
My husband is a serious hobbyist photographer. He recently did a portrait of the family cat sitting solemnly on a mantle. He put canvas through his inkjet printer and then added a coating to finish it. Fun! I think there always will be traditional artists, but it is nice that digital photography is gaining respect. Have a nice day!

GusSmed replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
I've never been much for paintings. What's the point when you can take a photograph instead? I've never been much interested in paintings either, but the argument for representational art seems straightforward. As a work of art, the essence of a photograph is composition. A painting allows you unlimited freedom for composition. The light, the positions, the expressions of your ...

Ga1Dawg replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
I've never been much for paintings... ******************* I've never been much for painting because I am no good at it :-}

dbsf replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Hmmm..... I dunno... http://gallery.me.com/dbsf#100142

1poorguy replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Paintings also offer a level of abstraction that often adds to the aesthetic. Certainly it has its uses in that respect. And I don't begrudge anyone that likes it. Different strokes, and all that. I'm just a philistine, I guess. I never liked paintings that didn't look like photos (I always respected the artist that could do that)**. But then we come to "just take the photo". Of...

GusSmed replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
I never liked Monet, or Impressionism in general. In mentioning abstraction, I was thinking more of the quality that definitely says "painting" to the eye, even though it's very much a sharp, representational image. Again, I'm thinking of the many, many cover paintings in my book collection, and how most of them would look terrible if they were photographs. Of course, part of that is ...

BobSch replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
**Monet? He's out of focus ( http://arttoheartweb.com/images/Claude%20Monet%20W ater%20Lil... ). Same with Van Gogh. Pollack? Nevermind... So you don't like Monet or Manet. How about Man Ray? Bob

PSUEngineer replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
It's a real shame Rembrandt didn't use a camera. PSU

JonathanRoth replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Rosie Hardy's work ( http://www.flickr.com/photos/rosie_hardy/282231951 4/in/set-7... ) is about as realistic as any Van Gogh. Is it photography or electronic painting? Is it a painting if an artist starts with a blank canvas and creates something using Photoshop or the same artist starts with a photograph and creates something based upon it using oils or modifies it using Photoshop? ...

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
1poorguy
2
user's latest post:
digital photography taking over!
Published (2009-11-11 19:09:00)
Paintings also offer a level of abstraction that often adds to the aesthetic. Certainly it has its uses in that respect. And I don't begrudge anyone that likes it. Different strokes, and all that. I'm just a philistine, I guess. I never liked paintings that didn't look like photos (I always respected the artist that could do that)**. But then we come to &quot;just take the photo&quot;. Of course I did like how paintings...
GusSmed
2
user's latest post:
digital photography taking over!
Published (2009-11-11 20:33:00)
I never liked Monet, or Impressionism in general. In mentioning abstraction, I was thinking more of the quality that definitely says &quot;painting&quot; to the eye, even though it's very much a sharp, representational image. Again, I'm thinking of the many, many cover paintings in my book collection, and how most of them would look terrible if they were photographs. Of course, part of that is money and effort. Most...
TroySR71
1
user's latest post:
digital photography taking over!
Published (2009-11-11 00:28:00)
I've never been much for paintings. What's the point when you can take a photograph instead? I appreciate Thomas Kinkade's work. Troy
lemoneater
1
user's latest post:
digital photography taking over!
Published (2009-11-11 09:53:00)
My husband is a serious hobbyist photographer. He recently did a portrait of the family cat sitting solemnly on a mantle. He put canvas through his inkjet printer and then added a coating to finish it. Fun! I think there always will be traditional artists, but it is nice that digital photography is gaining respect. Have a nice day!
Ga1Dawg
1
user's latest post:
digital photography taking over!
Published (2009-11-11 13:01:00)
I've never been much for paintings... ******************* I've never been much for painting because I am no good at it :-}
dbsf
1
user's latest post:
digital photography taking over!
Published (2009-11-11 18:57:00)
Hmmm..... I dunno... http://gallery.me.com/dbsf#100142
JonathanRoth
1
user's latest post:
digital photography taking over!
Published (2009-11-12 12:23:00)
Rosie Hardy's work ( http://www.flickr.com/photos/rosie_hardy/2822319514/in/set-7... ) is about as realistic as any Van Gogh. Is it photography or electronic painting? Is it a painting if an artist starts with a blank canvas and creates something using Photoshop or the same artist starts with a photograph and creates something based upon it using oils or modifies it using Photoshop? Are we really discussing the dividing line between...
BobSch
1
user's latest post:
digital photography taking over!
Published (2009-11-12 09:15:00)
**Monet? He's out of focus ( http://arttoheartweb.com/images/Claude%20Monet%20Water%20Lil... ). Same with Van Gogh. Pollack? Nevermind... So you don't like Monet or Manet. How about Man Ray? Bob
PSUEngineer
1
user's latest post:
digital photography taking over!
Published (2009-11-12 09:27:00)
It's a real shame Rembrandt didn't use a camera. PSU
mjolah
1
user's latest post:
digital photography taking over!
Published (2009-11-12 18:03:00)
I have to comment.... I am a digital photographer, but definately appreciate painting as an art form - separate and distinct from the photograph. The artistry in photography is in the subject matter. composition, lighting, and if you must - post processing (which I don't do, but can appreciate it as a SEPARATE part of the art form). Nonetheless, photography is an art form of what the lens sees - as possibly modified by the photographer...

Related threads on "The Motley Fool Discussion Boards":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "digital photography taking over!" on http://www.fool.com. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "digital photography taking over!", located on the Message Board at http://www.fool.com. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity