Quote:
Originally Posted by gfourth
http://forums.extremeoverclocking.com/showthread.p hp?t=315206
I don't think anyone has RAID-ed a raptor and 7200 RPM in that thread.
I don't see how RAID-ing them would be worse than non-raid. Give it a try and see what blows up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hickeydog
I don't think anyone has RAID-ed a raptor and 7200 RPM in that thread.
I don't see how RAID-ing them would be worse than non-raid. Give it a try and see what blows up.
Whoops I completely misunderstood what he meant. I thought he wanted to compare raided Raptors with ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by gfourth
Whoops I completely misunderstood what he meant. I thought he wanted to compare raided Raptors with raided 7200rpm drives.
Nonononononono. He wants to RAID a Raptor with a 7200.
In all honest, I doubt you'd see any real-world benifits.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hickeydog
Nonononononono. He wants to RAID a Raptor with a 7200.
exactly. I know it sounds like a crazy idea, but who knows. 2 big raptors costs alot, so I figured maybe you could RAID a raptor along with a big 7200 and get decent results
idk maybe I'll be the first to try it...
for hardware raid the drives need to be the same size, or if it does work, it will see the larger drive as the same size as the smaller drive. And the slower drive will bottleneck the faster drive. Raided drives really do need to be matching pairs.
edit: I get pretty nice results with a pair of WD 500GB drives in raid 0, and I got them both on sale for ~$45 ea.
I'm going to make an educated guess that the bigger drive will top out at the Raptors max GB size and the Raptor will slow to the bigger drives max RPMS. If it's 7,200: 14,400 (theoretical, of course) is faster than 10,000. If it works, I think it'd be faster than the Raptor by itself.
I see no point in this actually. The way I see it, access time on a raid 0 array will be as fast as the slowest drive, because both drives are always accessed simultaneously. So the Raptor's fast access time will not come to play here. Not sure if this is really like that, but this is how I imagine it to be. Transfer speeds on a raid 0 array will still be better, but since raptors are not known ...
It would be like crossfiring two different 4800's like a 4870 512MB and a 4890 1GB. The faster card would slow it's clocks to match the slower card and it would also only be able to utilize half it's RAM. You can only go as fast as the slowest component
Quote: Originally Posted by Odanez I see no point in this actually. The way I see it, access time on a raid 0 array will be as fast as the slowest drive, because both drives are always accessed simultaneously. So the Raptor's fast access time will not come to play here. Not sure if this is really like that, but this is how I imagine it to be. Transfer speeds on a raid 0 array will still be better, but since raptors are not known for high...
I decided to scrap this idea, because according to HD tune I'm getting 108MB/sec with my 2 74gb raptors right now. so I dont think it would work so great
Quote: Originally Posted by Hickeydog I don't think anyone has RAID-ed a raptor and 7200 RPM in that thread. I don't see how RAID-ing them would be worse than non-raid. Give it a try and see what blows up. Whoops I completely misunderstood what he meant. I thought he wanted to compare raided Raptors with raided 7200rpm drives.
Quote: Originally Posted by gfourth Whoops I completely misunderstood what he meant. I thought he wanted to compare raided Raptors with raided 7200rpm drives. Nonononononono. He wants to RAID a Raptor with a 7200. In all honest, I doubt you'd see any real-world benifits.
Quote: Originally Posted by dcsimmons I have had 6 150 gig raptors running in a Raid 0 for 2 years on a Giga-byte P35t-DQ6. Have ran flawlessly. I also have had 4 75 Gigs running in a RAid 0 for 4 years flawlessly. They really fly in doing so! but you haven't "mixed" the arrays have you? I mean e.g. 2 raptors AND 2 80gb normal drives on the very same array... because that is the question currently at hand
for hardware raid the drives need to be the same size, or if it does work, it will see the larger drive as the same size as the smaller drive. And the slower drive will bottleneck the faster drive. Raided drives really do need to be matching pairs. edit: I get pretty nice results with a pair of WD 500GB drives in raid 0, and I got them both on sale for ~$45 ea.
It would be like crossfiring two different 4800's like a 4870 512MB and a 4890 1GB. The faster card would slow it's clocks to match the slower card and it would also only be able to utilize half it's RAM. You can only go as fast as the slowest component
I have had 6 150 gig raptors running in a Raid 0 for 2 years on a Giga-byte P35t-DQ6. Have ran flawlessly. I also have had 4 75 Gigs running in a RAid 0 for 4 years flawlessly. They really fly in doing so!
you would probably see a bigger benifit getting say 2 or 3 western dig caviar blacks in raid 0. and save alot of money over the raptor+7200 drive. those caviar blacks are pretty nice i have 2 in my server (raid 1, but still speedy)
Related threads on "EXTREME Overclocking Forums - Tweaking PC Hardware To The Max":
Thread profile page for "anyone done raid w/ raptor & non-raptor?" on http://www.extremeoverclocking.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "anyone done raid w/ raptor & non-raptor?", located on the Message Board at http://www.extremeoverclocking.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity