Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: Why is the Confederacy not worthy of contempt?

Started 1 month ago by Mr. Excellent
Inspired by this thread: http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=538 996 The Civil War has traditionally been one of the most heavily romanticized wars in American history. Even the defeated Confederates are referred to with respect, and there's a Robert E. Lee memorial right in Arlington National Cemetery. Why is this so? I mean, sure, not everyone who fought for the ...
Site: Straight Dope Message Board  Straight Dope Message Board - site profile
Forum: Great Debates  Great Debates - forum profile
Total authors: 76 authors
Total thread posts: 398 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: straightdope.com

Other posts in this thread:

Sage Rat replied 1 month ago
1) Both sides were Americans. 2) Lots of people died. It was a massively fatal war because of rifled guns and dated strategies. 3) The generals on the Northern side were pretty ineffectual until Grant. The South should have lost by all measures, but Lee was impressive and the North was terrible. It's hard to root for the guy who sucked.

Der Trihs replied 1 month ago
Quote: Originally Posted by Mr. Excellent By a similar token, the Confederate cause was so tightly entwined with slavery that - though the preservation of slavery was not the *sole* war aim of the rebels - it seems inappropriate to romanticize it, or somehow regard the Confederate soldiers as "good" guys. But this ...

Doctor Who replied 1 month ago
Quote: Originally Posted by Mr. Excellent By a similar token, the Confederate cause was so tightly entwined with slavery that - though the preservation of slavery was not the *sole* war aim of the rebels - it seems inappropriate to romanticize it, or somehow regard the Confederate soldiers as "good" guys. These were American citizens ...

Captain Amazing replied 1 month ago
There are a lot of people who's ancestors fought for the Confederacy in this country. There aren't very many descendants of German WWII soldiers in this country. Also, after World War II, Germany went out of its way to condemn the Nazi period. The southern US, after the Civil War, on the other hand, went out of its way to praise and glorify the Civil War and Confederate cause.

Odesio replied 1 month ago
Quote: Originally Posted by Mr. Excellent The Civil War has traditionally been one of the most heavily romanticized wars in American history. Even the defeated Confederates are referred to with respect, and there's a Robert E. Lee memorial right in Arlington National Cemetery. Worse than being romanticized is the ...

Lemur866 replied 1 month ago
Quote: Originally Posted by Doctor Who On preview, I think it would be historical revisionism to discount the other reasons for the Civil War. To hand wave away the complicated issue of states rights (as an example) would be a disservice. Except that "States Rights" was always and only about a State's right to ...

DrCube replied 1 month ago
I think the Confederacy was absolutely a contemptible organization, fundamentally built upon racism and slavery, but the South in general was and is not. I tend not to hold people responsible for their institutions. I don't know a single person who supports the drug war. When it comes to forwarding the despicable cause of prohibition, the current US government is also contemptible. But the ...

Doctor Who replied 1 month ago
Quote function is not working for me Lemur, but I do agree with you that many people used "States' Rights" as a code word for slavery. On the other hand, there were certainly people that used "States' Rights" to stand for a state's right to secede. The idea being that since states had willingly chosen to join into a Union, they surely had the right to choose to leave that Union. Don't get ...

ToeJam replied 1 month ago
I view it akin as to all Nazi's were bad, but I do respect the tactics and leadership of Rommel. I don't agree with his policies, but the man was a good general, and respected on both sides of the war. Same thing here- the South managed to fend off incompetent Union General after General, and again- this was a highly romanticized war. "Brother vs. Brother, Father vs. Son" sorta business. You ...

dropzone replied 1 month ago
Quote: Originally Posted by Odesio For some reason I doubt that. There are still veteran's organizations in Germany were they get together, drink beer, bullshit, and talk about the good old days. I doubt they'd do that if they didn't have some amount of pride in how they served Germany. Worked with a fellow whose...

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
Sampiro
93
user's latest post:
Why is the Confederacy not...
Published (2009-12-04 11:23:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Dissonance Minor side point, but did you mean in the Civil War rather than 'ever?' Joan d'Arc immediately popped into my head, I'm sure there are prior instances to be found. Sorry, I meant American woman . (Nzinga was the wrath of God to would be slavers in Uganda centuries before Harriet, Boudicca was raising hell 1500 years before Nzinga and Hatshepsut thousands before Boudicca, so warrior...
Jackmannii
32
user's latest post:
Why is the Confederacy not...
Published (2009-12-04 13:53:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by WreckingCrew In particular, I view Lee as a traitor to the United States for resigning his commission in the U.S. Army in order to take up arms against it This is compounded by how effective he was for much of the war. On the other hand, we should have considered giving Braxton Bragg the Congressional Medal of Honor.
villa
31
user's latest post:
Why is the Confederacy not...
Published (2009-12-02 13:16:00)
Oh I agree - but I would argue it was more their social position that was propped up by slavery rather than their economic one. The plantations could have been run more efficiently with wage labor, I'd argue. Abolition would certainly have destroyed the social structure; not that that would have been a bad thing.
MEBuckner
31
user's latest post:
Why is the Confederacy not...
Published (2009-12-09 02:31:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Zoe Y'all surely can come up with the most amazing excuses for why 200 or more years of slavery in the North don't really count. Has anybody here said that? Has anyone said "When they had slavery up in New York, it was just peachy!" What we're saying is that the Confederate States of America is not worthy of our support. Of course we should remember it, in a historical sense, but...
you with the face
24
user's latest post:
Why is the Confederacy not...
Published (2009-12-02 11:48:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Zoe Why is the North not worthy of contempt? It only makes sense to ask this question if you think the South = Confederacy. It doesn't. And you know this. The "South" was in existence long before the Civil War and continues to exist today. It doesn't have a government or a united belief system. It is simply a regional designation that happens to correlate with certain cultural artifacts....
LouisB
12
user's latest post:
Why is the Confederacy not...
Published (2009-11-26 20:43:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by you with the face Obviously you are. Since you asked. It really is possible for you to misinterpret anything you read, isn't it?
billfish678
11
user's latest post:
Why is the Confederacy not...
Published (2009-12-03 23:43:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Jackmannii It's better than naming the back of the building after her. You have no idea of the irony involved here. You know what looms behind the bus terminal/headquarters ? A butt ugly 5 story or so jail. And for the longest time, just to right of it was the farmers market. Not sure if that is still active or not though. No, I am not making this up.
Kimstu
8
user's latest post:
Why is the Confederacy not...
Published (2009-11-12 23:22:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by MEBuckner If the Confederacy had won its independence, this would be a whole other conversation. We'd all be arguing about, on the one hand, how can you support a country which didn't abolish slavery until 1937 [...] But none of that happened. And I think the root of this controversy is that many Southerners feel on some level that it did. That is, they see the Confederacy and its symbols as standing in a...
Odesio
8
user's latest post:
Why is the Confederacy not...
Published (2009-12-03 22:16:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Sampiro Meaning nothing personal though- and I really don't- I find it hard to bow my head to a biographical assessment of Davis from somebody who not only didn't know the legend of his wearing a dress when captured I didn't make a biographical assessment of Jefferson Davis. I simply said that monuments honor him because of his presidency of the Confederacy and not his political life prior to the...
Captain Amazing
8
user's latest post:
Why is the Confederacy not...
Published (2009-12-02 13:11:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by villa But slavery was a drain on the southern economy. Had economic concerns been paramount, then the sensible thing would have been a (reasonably rapid) phasing out of slavery. Slavery was a drain on the economy, but it was an insidious one. The southern states before the Civil War were dominated economically and politically by a small plantation elite who had all their wealth tied up in slavery and slaveholding....

Related threads on "Straight Dope Message Board":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "Why is the Confederacy not worthy of contempt?" on http://www.straightdope.com. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Why is the Confederacy not worthy of contempt?", located on the Message Board at http://www.straightdope.com. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity