Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: Why 700mb AVI ?

Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Kill4nothin
Site: isoHunt Forums  isoHunt Forums - site profile
Forum: Apps, etc.   Apps, etc.   - forum profile
Total authors: 6 authors
Total thread posts: 7 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: isohunt.com

Other posts in this thread:

talkingmuya replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Vidrio replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago

djdezzie replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Lifechanger replied 1 month, 1 week ago

talkingmuya replied 1 month, 1 week ago
Thanx Everyone. 1.4gb is the new average as I am seeing for DVD rips anyway. Blue Ray rips dont seem to have an average but 1.4 to 2.8 is the variance. As I said before will be making my files 1 - 1.4 gb in size. As I saw it on my screen: 700mb looks good up to about a 40" screen. Any larger and you're going to want the 1.4gb size. Hope this forum ...

defcomexperiment replied 1 month, 1 week ago
talkingmuya wrote: Just a question but why has 700mb AVI files become the norm in the world ? I get much better quality and sound sync is not a problem, nor color or clarity when I make 1gb size files. I just dont understand why everyone is using CD size information when a larger file size produces better results. Especially when most of us are probably using...

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
talkingmuya
2
user's latest post:
Why 700mb AVI ?
Published (2009-11-11 05:20:00)
Thanx Everyone. 1.4gb is the new average as I am seeing for DVD rips anyway. Blue Ray rips dont seem to have an average but 1.4 to 2.8 is the variance. As I said before will be making my files 1 - 1.4 gb in size. As I saw it on my screen: 700mb looks good up to about a 40" screen. Any larger and you're going to want the 1.4gb size. Hope this forum thread is helpful to any other newbs out there ripping they're own stuff to...
djdezzie
1
user's latest post:
Why 700mb AVI ?
Published (2009-11-10 09:06:00)
Lifechanger
1
user's latest post:
Why 700mb AVI ?
Published (2009-11-10 14:03:00)
Kill4nothin
1
user's latest post:
Why 700mb AVI ?
Published (2009-11-10 06:14:00)
Vidrio
1
user's latest post:
Why 700mb AVI ?
Published (2009-11-10 08:24:00)
defcomexperiment
1
user's latest post:
Why 700mb AVI ?
Published (2009-11-11 15:42:00)
talkingmuya wrote: Just a question but why has 700mb AVI files become the norm in the world ? I get much better quality and sound sync is not a problem, nor color or clarity when I make 1gb size files. I just dont understand why everyone is using CD size information when a larger file size produces better results. Especially when most of us are probably using our hardrives to store this information and not shelves full of CD's. So is...

Related threads on "isoHunt Forums":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "Why 700mb AVI ?" on http://isohunt.com. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Why 700mb AVI ?", located on the Message Board at http://isohunt.com. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity