Thread: Who think the wwe "no blood" rule is ridiculous? - Yahoo! Answers

I agree with The Viper

It is a very stupid rule because blood adds more entertainment and the wwe is not meant 2 be for little kids. This whole pg era has messed everything up wwe is meant 2 have blood, cussing, and sexual content. Blood makes the match look more realistic and it gets the fans cheering for more and gets the superstars even more pumped up, so no blood rule sucks

its a dumb rule

Of course.The whole TV-PG thing is awful.If parents dont want their kids to see people bleeding than they should cover their eyes or maybe they are to young to watch wrestling.

I do unless it's like really bad like all over the place.

Yeah it adds to the brutality of some matches and when you see the loser or winner stumble off all bloodied up, they look to have been in a real battle. Well, Cena bled last night, maybe he asked for orton to hit him so he could juice or maybe Orton made an error.

Ofc it is ridiculous, blood is part of entertainment. If kids aren't supposed to see blood, then they aren't supposed to see some person getting electrified or falling on a table! Blood always add a taste to the match, at least in my opinion.

wwe in general is ridiculous now i pray that we dont have to sit through another 5 or 6 months of john the champ is queer cenas title reign again..they should of put him on smackdown, at least he could of had some new feuds on there...

Yes It's seriously ridiculous that it's not funny.WWE should be a lot more like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR1bKnhau…