Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: Who Uses 5x12?

Started 1 month ago by Richard K.
Who here uses 5x12? Do you have a dedicated camera (as opposed to a reducing back)? Which one? How do you acquire film? I don't think I've seen it on the yearly Ilford order. I suppose you can cut down 10x12? (which IS available through Ilford)...
Site: Large Format Photography Forum  Large Format Photography Forum - site profile
Forum: Cameras & Camera Accessories  Cameras & Camera Accessories - forum profile
Total authors: 348 authors
Total thread posts: 21 post
Thread activity: 473 new posts during last week
Domain info for: largeformatphotography.info

Other posts in this thread:

Gregory Ng replied 3 months, 1 week ago
Quote: Originally Posted by shadowleaves Gregory, would you please check your camera to see if it has zero detents for front or rear swing? those two movements are the ones that most need zero positions. Zero positions for front and rear tilt is not that important, since people will often adjust these tilts to optimize focus panel and ...

Gregory Ng replied 3 months, 1 week ago
Shadowleaves, The PTB617 rear standard functions just like that of the Chamonix 4x5. The Chamonix front standard has the advantage that, at its front most position, it is flush with the front edge of the ?focusing block?, thus acting as a kind of detent for front swing. That of the PTB617, however, is not ?flush? but about 1 cm behind. One probably has to measure it carefully once, and ...

snaefell replied 3 months, 1 week ago
Quote: Originally Posted by shadowleaves you set up the camera. Too bad IMHO. The Chamonix 045N-1, from which Shenhao apparently copies, at least has a rear zero-position, although not very accurate. I would love to see Chamonix building a foldable 6x17 camera, which has a bellows as long as the 45N-1. I would ...

venchka replied 3 months, 1 week ago
There is a Deardorff with 2 backs for $1,200 http://www.largeformatphotography.in...deardorff+8 x10 and a Kodak Master View. http://www.largeformatphotography.in...ght=kodak+8 x10

BetterSense replied 3 months, 1 week ago
I just got a 4x5 camera but I don't have any film holders, so I'm starting to keep an eye out online for mostly used film holders. Is there a difference in brand or is a film holder pretty much a film holder?

Richard K. replied 3 months, 1 week ago
Quote: Originally Posted by BetterSense .....or is a film holder pretty much a film holder? Yes. As long as the dark slides and the taped ends are good and there's no cracks or light leaks...

memorris replied 3 months, 1 week ago
In my experience, Toyo is the best brand. They hold the tolerances better than any other brand I have used.

Scott Sharp replied 3 months, 1 week ago
Hello everyone: The number for Western Bellows is up and working. My Seneca bellows order will be completed in a couple of weeks time. Jim is active and taking orders. This is the current number: (909) 980-0606 Last week, for whatever reason there was a glitch in the phone service, and I was not able to reach him. It probably was from my end on the line. If for any reason you are ...

David Karp replied 3 months, 1 week ago
Glad this is working out. The bellows that he made and installed on my Improved Seneca Whole Plate is beautiful.

hobbim replied 3 months, 1 week ago
Shift and rise should work as normal, like the back tilt affect geometry. Swing and tilt would change the "cats eye" fall-off, especially noticable on an extreme wide angle. For example, front tilt backwords would make the bottom of the film see a round hole ie. less fallof than the on the top that sees a cats eye hole. I have a spare lens board drilled with a 2mm hole for framing and ...

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
Mike1234
85
user's latest post:
Riteway vs Fidelity cut film...
Published (2009-12-11 17:49:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Per Madsen I can recommend Toyo holders instead. They are the best ! Quote: Originally Posted by Per Madsen Better made and better film flatness. I once had a pair of Fidelity holders, which was so sloppy manufactured, that the darkslides slowly slid out by themselves, when the holder was turned upside down. I have never had any problems with the Toyo holders. Quote: Originally Posted by BrianShaw Interesting......
GPS
53
user's latest post:
DLC 45, MQC 57, or Chamonix 45N...
Published (2009-12-09 22:02:00)
Re: DLC 45, MQC 57, or Chamonix 45N Quote: Originally Posted by Mike1234 Guys, I really want a lightweight 4x5 dedicated to 6x12cm roll film with lenses ranging from 38-300mm. This is a backup for when I just can't physically carry the 5x12in kit. When I CAN carry the 5x12 that'll be what I use but something smaller/lighter is needed for those not-so-good days. Oh, blessed be roll film! Who needs film holders? __________________ GPS
Jeremy Moore
46
user's latest post:
8x10 field cameras that are...
Published (2009-12-11 15:23:00)
John, some of the older wooden cameras, such as an Empire State, *might* have a problem, but that's more from not being too stable to begin with due to age and possible hard use (I've seen a few older wooden 8x10s with wobbly standards). If that's the case, though, a tune up by one of the camera repair guys (like Ritter) should take care of the problem.
Bob Salomon - HP Marketing
45
user's latest post:
Riteway vs Fidelity cut film...
Published (2009-12-11 21:43:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by bobwysiwyg Why? It's a serious question. They 'appear' quite similar in design, so I'm assuming it is a material issue? If you really want the best, they were the Linhof Double Sheet Film Holders and the Linhof Glass Plate/Sheet Film Holders. But neither have been made for a very long time.
Peter K
41
user's latest post:
Field Camera ground glass design...
Published (2009-12-11 15:43:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by wclavey Back on the question and response about putting a fresnel between the lens and the GG, it was my understanding that a fresnel lens transmitted the light at a rate that was equivalent to only 67% of the equivalent amount of air... in other words, if you inserted a 2mm thick fresnel into the light path, that was the equivalent of moving the GG forward by 0.66mm (2.0 - (.67 * 2.0))mm. This will only work with...
Clement Apffel
36
user's latest post:
Chamonix camera 45N-1 focusing...
Published (2009-12-06 20:13:00)
What I mean with "absolute 0 for GG alignment" is nanometric alignment, theoretically perfect alignment. Absolute alignment in a word. Do you really think viewcamera makers aim that precision? Do you realise the cost of production this precision would involve? Concerning the second point, again, you misunderstood what I mean. “Apply the real precision you need” doesn’t mean: do not care about precision. I know the...
venchka
36
user's latest post:
First time to buy - Page 4 -...
Published (2009-12-09 23:21:00)
Re: First time to buy One more thing I forgot: Harrison Film Changing Tent. Best purchase I made after good lenses. A totally portable, nearly dust free, dark room. Ideal for travelling. __________________ Wayne Deep in the darkest heart of the East Texas rainforest. Wayne's Blog FlickrMyBookFaceTwitSpace
Michael Roberts
31
user's latest post:
Restoring a Century Universal...
Published (2009-12-03 21:02:00)
Thanks Brad! I managed to get the bellows back in last night. I want to paint the joint all around the bellows and back frame just for extra precaution against light leaks. We're heading to Moab at dawn tomorrow for the weekend. Hopefully I can post some photos of the CU from the field when I get back. I put it on the Crown #4 tripod last night, and it looks pretty awesome. Seems very stable to me. On the scale, it comes in at 9lbs, 1.5 oz.
gregvds
29
user's latest post:
Would you buy this?
Published (2009-12-04 21:35:00)
I wouldn't. Too big and cubersome for me. Still on the 4x5"...
rdenney
28
user's latest post:
Sinar F - Page 4 - Large Format...
Published (2009-12-11 19:32:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by dfoo Making a board is probably pretty simple to me. I have lots of ply due to another hobby of mine (model airplanes). I'm not sure how the board attaches to the front standard, but if it is too thick will it put the focus off? Or is that simply dealt with in the process of focusing the camera? The plywood will have to be very thin. If you try to route down the edge to fit under the clips, you'll be down...

Related threads on "Large Format Photography Forum":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "Who Uses 5x12?" on http://www.largeformatphotography.info. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Who Uses 5x12?", located on the Message Board at http://www.largeformatphotography.info. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity