Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: What's more important ... Graphics processor or CPU speed?

Started 3 months, 4 weeks ago by Tommie Milwaukee
Which Mini would you rather have?: Previous generation Core 2 Duo with Intel 64mb video ram and the CPU upgraded to 2.33ghz, or ... Latest generation 2.0ghz with NVIDIA 256 mb video ram?
Site: 123Macmini.com - Forums  123Macmini.com - Forums - site profile
Forum: Mac Mini  Mac Mini - forum profile
Total authors: 3 authors
Total thread posts: 4 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: 123macmini.com

Other posts in this thread:

philiparcario replied 3 months, 4 weeks ago
price difference or equal price?

philiparcario replied 3 months, 4 weeks ago
you can get a 1.83 refurb for 419 from the apple store drop in a t7600 cpu for 281 so you are at 700 you can get a 2.0 refurb for 500. 4gb ram and a good hhd are a push say 140 so the 2009 2.0ghz will cost 650 the 2008 2.33ghz will cost 850 for 200 dollar difference i would take the 2009. if only for the dual lcd and firewire 800 hokup. speedwise they may be close to a tie...

CrisisDog replied 3 months, 3 weeks ago
Do you play games? If so, the graphics, and even then 9400M ain't that great for the newest stuff. Processor wise, it's a wash for daily activity. You won't notice the speed unless you're heavily into video encoding or some other activity that's going to push the machine.

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
philiparcario
2
user's latest post:
What's more important ......
Published (2009-08-27 19:17:00)
you can get a 1.83 refurb for 419 from the apple store drop in a t7600 cpu for 281 so you are at 700 you can get a 2.0 refurb for 500. 4gb ram and a good hhd are a push say 140 so the 2009 2.0ghz will cost 650 the 2008 2.33ghz will cost 850 for 200 dollar difference i would take the 2009. if only for the dual lcd and firewire 800 hokup. speedwise they may be close to a tie the 1067mhz would beat the 667mhz for speed about as much as the 2.33...
Tommie Milwaukee
1
user's latest post:
What's more important ......
Published (2009-08-27 18:40:00)
Which Mini would you rather have?: Previous generation Core 2 Duo with Intel 64mb video ram and the CPU upgraded to 2.33ghz, or ... Latest generation 2.0ghz with NVIDIA 256 mb video ram?
CrisisDog
1
user's latest post:
What's more important ......
Published (2009-08-28 21:49:00)
Do you play games? If so, the graphics, and even then 9400M ain't that great for the newest stuff. Processor wise, it's a wash for daily activity. You won't notice the speed unless you're heavily into video encoding or some other activity that's going to push the machine.

Related threads on "123Macmini.com - Forums":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "What's more important ... Graphics processor or CPU speed?" on http://www.123macmini.com. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "What's more important ... Graphics processor or CPU speed?", located on the Message Board at http://www.123macmini.com. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity