Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: Way better than Children of Men

Started 4 months, 2 weeks ago by fernandez_b101
Is it just me or did anyone else think thiswas better than children of men? They both touched on the same subject, this however had just the right amount of realism and alot better action. Plus Vin could take Clive anyday... and he's a way better actor
Site: IMDB - Babylon A.D. (2008)  IMDB - Babylon A.D. (2008) - site profile
Forum: Babylon A.D. (2008)   Babylon A.D. (2008)  - forum profile
Total authors: 16 authors
Total thread posts: 21 post
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: imdb.com

Other posts in this thread:

DaSource replied 4 months, 1 week ago
Sorry, but Children of men was way better than Babylon A.D. Children of men had a very realistic setting, Babylon AD has a lot of over the top action scenes. And Clive Owen is a good actor which Vinni isn`t in most of his movies

CommissarPepsi replied 4 months ago
Children of Men was Amazing, Babylon AD Barely Passed as a decent action flick. Plus what are you talkin bout clive is great, vin is alright at best, and clive would so take him.

Euroman_28 replied 4 months ago
Vin could kick Clives ass. I'm a Conservative, and thats my opinion on this matter.

varanoid replied 4 months ago
now that i think of it, babylon ad does seem like quite the rip off of children of men.

Firemerk2001-1 replied 4 months ago
Well...everyone said what I wanted to say...so I'll just say this.. You're f_cking gay. My Short horror amateur film! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghp63x4oiD0&feature =channel_page

Mermaidbronze replied 4 months ago
Now now, there's no need to go there. I liked both films. I like both actors. You can't make a comparison beteen Vin Diesel and Clive Owen. They're two different types of actors who approach their craft in totally different ways, and appeal to totally different audiences. "Children of Men" was grittier, uglier, more cerebral, depressing, and deep about the psycho-social consequences of a post-...

protolexis replied 4 months ago
The OP is either a troll or a moron who thinks Transformers 2 is the greatest film ever made. Children of Men is a masterpiece compared to this steaming pile of excrement and this is coming from someone who is a fan of Mathieu Kassovitz's other work (well except Gothika *facepalm*). "Join the army, see the world, meet interesting people - and kill 'em." - Woody Allen

joeymcf replied 4 months ago
to be honest i felt there was something weird about children of men that i didn't enjoy...or like in any form just a nagging feeling. still...it was better than babylon a.d. which i thought was better than others made it out to be

protolexis replied 3 months, 4 weeks ago
"Something weird" Wow very descriptive. The film is supposed to give you an uneasy feeling. That's the point of this film and the effect the director was going for. With Babylon you didn't give two $hits about the characters and couldn't see yourself relating to them on any level. If you want happy-go-lucky films then watch Wall-E. "Join the army, see the world, meet interesting ...

grey_outlaw replied 3 months, 3 weeks ago
Awesome wall of text, not sure if you're trying to build an argument or a house but either way go for it! " It's The Fourth Of The Trilogies!" Lord Of The Ringtones, Orange Net.

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
protolexis
4
user's latest post:
Way better than Children of Men
Published (2009-10-21 13:27:00)
If you were directing your response at him you should have said "@ Mermaid" or something along those lines. There are dozens of responses to the OP and other posters - we aren't psychic. If you had any intellect you'd know to do that. "Join the army, see the world, meet interesting people - and kill 'em." - Woody Allen
grey_outlaw
2
user's latest post:
Way better than Children of Men
Published (2009-08-21 12:08:00)
I was actually replying to Mermaidbronze but if you feel the need to feel intellectually superior to others, join Mermaid and go for it too! " It's The Fourth Of The Trilogies!" Lord Of The Ringtones, Orange Net.
sltcs6010
2
user's latest post:
Way better than Children of Men
Published (2009-11-27 06:56:00)
surface loving ignorance... principle reason, more a less a staple to the overall feel? what are u talking about. please, dont even try to sound intilligent if your going to finish a comment with FAIL. i didnt even enjoy this movie that much, but children of men is just pretentious... much like those who enjoyed it.
joeymcf
1
user's latest post:
Way better than Children of Men
Published (2009-08-07 13:37:00)
to be honest i felt there was something weird about children of men that i didn't enjoy...or like in any form just a nagging feeling. still...it was better than babylon a.d. which i thought was better than others made it out to be
baykid650
1
user's latest post:
Way better than Children of Men
Published (2009-08-15 03:11:00)
First of all, *beep*! It takes a lot just to register and be able to post on imdb. Second of all, you're an idiot. The only reason I registered was to tell you you're an idiot. Babylon AD, though probably not as bad as they say, still sucks more golfballs through a hose than a bagless upright on an infomercial. Now, I like me some Vin Diesel in a flick every now and again. None of that Pacifier *beep* mind you. But this movie is just...
fernandez_b101
1
user's latest post:
Way better than Children of Men
Published (2009-07-25 07:43:00)
Is it just me or did anyone else think thiswas better than children of men? They both touched on the same subject, this however had just the right amount of realism and alot better action. Plus Vin could take Clive anyday... and he's a way better actor
Philmosaur
1
user's latest post:
Way better than Children of Men
Published (2009-08-18 21:13:00)
I saw this on cable and am really glad I only wasted time on it. While there were some interesting visuals, the actions scenes were very poorly edited, the story was far from original, the dialog was stilted, and there were so many times I thought "WTF?" that the only way I could suffer through the whole disaster was to accept that this was just a mess and see if it could get worse. "Children of Men" was a...
DaSource
1
user's latest post:
Way better than Children of Men
Published (2009-07-28 03:46:00)
Sorry, but Children of men was way better than Babylon A.D. Children of men had a very realistic setting, Babylon AD has a lot of over the top action scenes. And Clive Owen is a good actor which Vinni isn`t in most of his movies
XTRADER
1
user's latest post:
Way better than Children of Men
Published (2009-09-26 11:26:00)
it's official "you're an idiot" if you really think this!
CommissarPepsi
1
user's latest post:
Way better than Children of Men
Published (2009-08-02 00:53:00)
Children of Men was Amazing, Babylon AD Barely Passed as a decent action flick. Plus what are you talkin bout clive is great, vin is alright at best, and clive would so take him.

Related threads on "IMDB - Babylon A.D. (2008)":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "Way better than Children of Men" on http://imdb.com/title/tt0364970/. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Way better than Children of Men", located on the Message Board at http://imdb.com/title/tt0364970/. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity