Thread: WTC Tower 7 - CBC Passionate Eye

Ya there is a constant need in the Truther community to downplay the amount of damage to WTC7 - you'll read their tracts and they will describe the situation as WTC7 just having "limited fires" or "limited damages". This is designed to give the reader a sense of implausibility that the building could have fallen from "natural causes" (much like the way they approach WTC 1 and 2 - by...

^^^ No need, they have footage of a massive chunk of one of the twin towes smashing into WTC7. The damage is substantial but it's on the other side of the WTC 7 than you see in the standard 'this is a controled demo' clip. Seeing that was all I needed to put that issue to rest, assuming it's not doctored etc. but I'll give CBC benifit of the doubt.

Seen it, it's a good doc. It helps to explain the freakish perfection of the WTC7 collapse, which is great because sometimes all it takes is an mature and scientific explanation to put myths to rest. I'm fairly convinced that a handful of people within the Bush administration knew the attack was coming though.

Anyone else watch this? I'm curious to the reaction from people who still believe it was an inside job, since the CBC piece - while presenting both sides of the argument - showed much more convincing evidence that did not support the conspiracy theories. A couple of things I noticed... one of the 'Truthers' talks about how a 6-year-old would recognize the destruction of the building as a controlled demolition since it came...