Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
Loading... 

Thread: Understanding Heller


Started 1 year, 4 months ago by ISOM
There is a great deal of CASE LAW in the Supreme Court's decision. That means a lot to wade through! The decision was that each individual is allowed to possess. For some reason Washington DC just can not read and comprehend the law/decision.
Site: Glock Talk  Glock Talk - site profile
Forum: Gun-Control Issues  Gun-Control Issues - forum profile
Total authors: 6 authors
Total thread posts: 14 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: glocktalk.com

Other posts in this thread:

Apocalypse_Now replied 1 year, 2 months ago
I understand Heller It allows you have have a single shot .22 handgun in your home I am tired of seeing compromisers represent us and our liberties.. this lawyer is one of them, handing away our military weapons right . The founders had cannons, grenades, mortars and more, all considered arms, all types being in private hands and all considered to be so essential that Lexington, ...

Jeff S. replied 1 year, 2 months ago
Quote: Originally Posted by Apocalypse_Now I understand Heller It allows you have have a single shot .22 handgun in your home I am tired of seeing compromisers represent us and our liberties.. this lawyer is one of them, handing away our military weapons right . The founders had cannons, grenades, mortars and more, all ...

Syclone538 replied 1 year, 2 months ago
Every time I talk to someone in person about Heller, I ask them if they understand Miller. I haven't had anyone say they did. Miller basically said the .gov could restrict a short barrel shotgun because it had no militia use, even though the military used shotguns for trench warfare in WW1. Now you would think because thompsons and BARs clearly have a militia use that they could not restrict ...

Edge replied 1 year, 1 month ago
Alan is speaking February 21 in Springfield IL at ISRA banquet. I plan to be there. http://www.isra.org/calendar/annualmeeting-2009-we b.pdf FWIW: In an ideal world, the ruling would have been stronger, incorporated 14th, etc.; but there is a whole bunch of anti-gun people right now bemoaning that they just lost by 1 vote. I'm thankful for the win (even as it is) and fearful what ...

Jeff S. replied 1 year ago
Quote: Originally Posted by Edge Alan is speaking February 21 in Springfield IL at ISRA banquet. I plan to be there. Any update?

Jeff S. replied 1 year ago
Quote: Originally Posted by Edge Alan is speaking February 21 in Springfield IL at ISRA banquet. I plan to be there. Any update?

Jeff S. replied 1 year ago
3-2-09 The NRA case against Chicago and surrounding districts has been combined with Gura & Possessky's case. G&P Appellant Brief, PDF NRA's Appellant Brief, PDF You can find the Amici Curiae Briefs here . I have read Gura's brief, and it is very good. He does take a jab at the NRA's brief, and I'm not exactly sure why, but there is a difference in interpretation of ...

dugo replied 1 year ago
Anybody seen any further advancement of the idea argued in the Heller dissent (to which they gave enough space to be scary...!) about how the Bill of Rights does not contain a right of self-defense, implying that that means there is no such right? Of course, the Bill of Rights was put together for the purpose of protecting some of the pre-existing rights that were a natural part of being ...

Edge replied 11 months, 4 weeks ago
Quote: Originally Posted by Jeff S. Any update? Sorry for not providing one earlier. He gave a great presentation, answered questions until there weren't any more, and got a standing ovation if memory serves. He posts updates on his chicago gun case website which is referenced earlier. It was worth the ...

Jeff S. replied 4 months ago
From www.chicagoguncase.com : By Alan Gura "As the case ramps up, and we have more information to share, this site will become a bit more active. On Monday, we’re going to be filing the opening brief on the merits before the Supreme Court. Check in around mid-day if you’re interested. Also on Monday, we expect to see filed (and of course, we’ll post here) the NRA’s “...

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
Jeff S.
8
user's latest post:
Understanding Heller
Published (2010-01-30 13:32:00)
Alan Gura's reply brief is now posted at Chicagoguncase.com __________________ "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." -- Thomas Jefferson Understanding Heller. Update 11-15-09
Edge
2
user's latest post:
Understanding Heller
Published (2009-03-24 07:57:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Jeff S. Any update? Sorry for not providing one earlier. He gave a great presentation, answered questions until there weren't any more, and got a standing ovation if memory serves. He posts updates on his chicago gun case website which is referenced earlier. It was worth the fairly long drive to Springfield just to hear him.
ISOM
1
user's latest post:
Understanding Heller
Published (2008-10-21 07:09:00)
There is a great deal of CASE LAW in the Supreme Court's decision. That means a lot to wade through! The decision was that each individual is allowed to possess. For some reason Washington DC just can not read and comprehend the law/decision.
Apocalypse_Now
1
user's latest post:
Understanding Heller
Published (2009-01-03 21:38:00)
I understand Heller It allows you have have a single shot .22 handgun in your home I am tired of seeing compromisers represent us and our liberties.. this lawyer is one of them, handing away our military weapons right . The founders had cannons, grenades, mortars and more, all considered arms, all types being in private hands and all considered to be so essential that Lexington, Concord and the American Revolution began over this issue, when...
Syclone538
1
user's latest post:
Understanding Heller
Published (2009-01-17 02:47:00)
Every time I talk to someone in person about Heller, I ask them if they understand Miller. I haven't had anyone say they did. Miller basically said the .gov could restrict a short barrel shotgun because it had no militia use, even though the military used shotguns for trench warfare in WW1. Now you would think because thompsons and BARs clearly have a militia use that they could not restrict those, but they were restricted by the same law...
dugo
1
user's latest post:
Understanding Heller
Published (2009-03-11 13:51:00)
Anybody seen any further advancement of the idea argued in the Heller dissent (to which they gave enough space to be scary...!) about how the Bill of Rights does not contain a right of self-defense, implying that that means there is no such right? Of course, the Bill of Rights was put together for the purpose of protecting some of the pre-existing rights that were a natural part of being human, "God-given" if you will, and not to...

Related threads on "Glock Talk":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "Understanding Heller" on http://www.glocktalk.com. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Understanding Heller", located on the Message Board at http://www.glocktalk.com. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity