Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: The Royal Family, good or bad to have them?

Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago by MazterCBlazter
Some interesting things happened in the Shang today. with Charles and Camilla coming to Canada to cruise around and give us a visit. So let's discuss the merits and the disadvantages to keeping them as a Royal family. I will start this with quoting a couple of my comments in the Shang: Quote: Originally Posted by ...
Site: ehMac.ca  ehMac.ca - site profile
Forum: Everything Else, eh!   Everything Else, eh!   - forum profile
Total authors: 17 authors
Total thread posts: 121 post
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: ehmac.ca

Other posts in this thread:

adagio replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Some surprising thoughts there, MCB. According to many polls we are in the minority these days. Many want to rid Canada of our ties to the monarchy. I don't believe they should be running the show but I certainly have no problem with their current role. There aren't many that think like me anymore. I happen to like and believe in tradition. I don't have any problem being Canadian AND ...

bsenka replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
I voted "other". We absolutely should respect the history, symbolism, and tradition of the monarchy, but they should not have any real power. While their current role is largely symbolic, the constitution still attributes real power to them that should be there in any official capacity.

MazterCBlazter replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Quote: Originally Posted by adagio Some surprising thoughts there, MCB. According to many polls we are in the minority these days. Many want to rid Canada of our ties to the monarchy. I don't believe they should be running the show but I certainly have no problem ...

sharonmac09 replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Just think about what MCB is saying..... Monarchs are impartial and thus not accountable or tied to any lobby groups, political parties, businesses or individuals. Monarchs represent a whole society or nation. Monarchy because of its lifelong reigns is able to solve long term issues. Since Monarchy doesn't belong to any party or group, every citizen is equal in their eyes. Monarchs are...

MazterCBlazter replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
When Russia was under the control of the Czars it had its problems but was a good place to live and do business. People became impatient and overthrew them, as they weren't thinking long term and did not understand the consequences of their actions. Russia has since then never been as good a place to live since so far as I can see. If they keep the Czars and the royal family and gave ...

Max replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
A monarchy is every bit as susceptible to bribery and corruption as a parliamentary system or a republic. Perhaps even more so, given the theoretical ability to bar any form of comprehensive investigation - and subsequent prosecution for - corrupt goings-on within the upper echelons of an opaque monarchy. In any case, it's no panacea. Monarchy has a spectacular and often-bloody history of ...

SINC replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Quote: Originally Posted by sharonmac09 Monarchs are impartial and thus not accountable or tied to any lobby groups, political parties, businesses or individuals. Monarchs represent a whole society or nation. Monarchy because of its lifelong reigns is able to solve ...

MazterCBlazter replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Quote: Originally Posted by sharonmac09 Just think about what MCB is saying..... Monarchs are impartial and thus not accountable or tied to any lobby groups, political parties, businesses or individuals. Monarchs represent a whole society or nation. Monarchy ...

MazterCBlazter replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Quote: Originally Posted by SINC I've got some swamp land in Florida I'd like to sell you. That should get first prize for the fairy tale of the day. Isn't that where Bush stole the vote?

Rps replied 1 month, 3 weeks ago
I think the more logical question here is this: If the Monarchy is an institution which is suitable for governing, why aren't more countries with a history of an existing monarchy turning over the power to them? Answer: They are useless at leadership in the current world stage.

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
MazterCBlazter
19
user's latest post:
The Royal Family, good or bad to...
Published (2009-11-04 22:43:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Smoothfonzo My family has quite a history with the Royal Family. I've met Prince Charles twice, and Princess Diana once, probably during one of the last two times they came to Canada; I know it was during the same visit where they had their famous visit to Niagara Falls. During one of the Queen's visits in the 80's, my sister had personally handed some flowers to her, something we were told was...
Rps
18
user's latest post:
The Royal Family, good or bad to...
Published (2009-11-04 20:16:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Gilles Wouldn't you be concentrating all the power into one person, then ? And it looks like an unelected one at that Giles....... a system fit for a King I'd say.
Gilles
12
user's latest post:
The Royal Family, good or bad to...
Published (2009-11-05 00:41:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by (( p g )) […] there are a whole range of "reserve" powers at his/her disposal... essentially things that the GG has never/rarely exercised, but could in the event of a serious emergency or constitutional crisis stemming from an abuse of power at the executive branch. Considering that the Governor General is hand-picked by the Prime Minister although he is appointed by the Queen, I doubt he...
rgray
12
user's latest post:
The Royal Family, good or bad to...
Published (2009-11-03 22:09:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Gilles I would go further, and abolish all political parties ; the citizens then would be able to vote for people who truly represent them. If you think about it, we only have a choice amongst candidates that are screened by the party they belong to, and they have to follow the party line even in contradiction to what the electors think. Even if a person starts out with good intentions by time they have made it...
SINC
11
user's latest post:
The Royal Family, good or bad to...
Published (2009-11-04 20:16:00)
^ +1 Creating a dictatorship are we?
Dr.G.
11
user's latest post:
The Royal Family, good or bad to...
Published (2009-11-04 21:34:00)
King of the Britons ................ YouTube - Monty Python- The Annoying Peasant
BigDL
9
user's latest post:
The Royal Family, good or bad to...
Published (2009-11-04 15:31:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Gilles I agree. But big corporations and professional politicians fear local views and democracy. The so-called globalization wouldn't have been possible if your neighbors could have voted for you as their representative ; unless they agree to globalize. The concept of "majority" would be totally different than what it is now ; we would have ad hoc and fluctuating majorities, to be negotiated...
sharonmac09
7
user's latest post:
The Royal Family, good or bad to...
Published (2009-11-03 17:03:00)
rgray and Sinc, for FYI, the description of the monarchy powers is derived from the following link. Advantages of Monarchy (Imperial Qing Restoration Organization) FYI, I have tried to remain impartial in this discussion. I'm 100% behind democracy even though this system is imperfect and full of corruption and cronyism.
chasMac
5
user's latest post:
The Royal Family, good or bad to...
Published (2009-11-03 17:54:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Rps No problem, just remember though, in times of deepest despair the Royal family were and probably always will be an inspiration to the British. Yes, but is this owing to a monarchical system? Or in other words, could not any head of state and his family have fulfilled this role; whether or not they acheived their position through being born into it, elected into it, or simply took it. Remember, the little...
Max
5
user's latest post:
The Royal Family, good or bad to...
Published (2009-11-03 23:18:00)
If you have to vote, in no way does that guarantee that you'll actually think before you vote.

Related threads on "ehMac.ca":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "The Royal Family, good or bad to have them?" on http://www.ehmac.ca. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "The Royal Family, good or bad to have them?", located on the Message Board at http://www.ehmac.ca. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity