Thread: Teens who sodomized 18 11-14 year old boys may avoid jail
Started 3 years, 8 months ago by Mermaid Princess
Another horrible crime story:
Son of Senate president offered plea deal in assault case
Monday, April 3, 2006 10:48 AM CDT
PHOENIX (AP) - Two young men charged with sodomizing 18 boys at a youth
camp last year have been offered a plea agreement that may net them little
jail time and no record of sexual assault.
Clifton Bennett, 18, the son of Arizona Senate President Ken Bennett, and
his co...
Ellen Brent Peacemaker replied 3 years, 8 months ago
Quote:
"Our biggest concern is that these kids are going to do it again," the
mother of an 11-year-old Tucson boy told The Arizona Republic. "My son had
something shoved up his butt seven or eight times. If that's not sexual
assault, what is?"
Prosecutor James Landis told a judge at last week's hearing that the
"broomsticking" was a hazing ritual and a punishment, not sexual assault.
BULL
...
Ellen Brent Peacemaker replied 3 years, 8 months ago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiggs
****ing Mormons.
This case is clearly bull****.
How is this related to Mormons??
-------
EDIT
-------
Never mind. I found the connection in the text above. But I don't know of
it's either fair or justifiable to associate this crime with ALL Mormons.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mermaid Princess
Bennett apologized for his role in court last week, saying he was
"trying every way he can to rectify the situation."
Heh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellen Brent Peacemaker
How is this related to Mormons??
-------
EDIT
-------
Never mind. I found the connection in the text above. But I don't know of
it's either fair or justifiable to associate this crime with ALL Mormons.
Thank you Captain Obvious! You get a brand new Obviousness awards!
So, the male gender loses again in sexual assault cases.
Sodomize a girl, you get tossed in the slammer and the key thrown away.
Sodomize a boy, it's called "Hazing". Inappropriate or harrassing post?
Report Post | IP: Logged
Ellen Brent Peacemaker replied 3 years, 8 months ago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artist24
So, the male gender loses again in sexual assault cases.
Sodomize a girl, you get tossed in the slammer and the key thrown away.
Sodomize a boy, it's called "Hazing".
The whole case is revolving around the word "intent". So the judge is
basically saying "Well, they didn't INTEND for it to be sexual, so it
wasn't."
yeah ... right ...
What the hell ever ...
Frank the 6 foot Bunny replied 3 years, 8 months ago
This is fucking terrible! Hazing? Are you kidding me?
The worst part about this is the religious part. Specifically this...
"A felony conviction for assault will make his desire to complete his
mission impossible," they wrote.
Boo fucking hoo he can't go on his mission! I can't believe this bullshit,
you can assault young boys SEXUALLY and then actually use as an excuse that
you won't get to go...
Quote: Originally Posted by Jimmy Jazz See my edit above. Mormons are the most Republican of any religious group. Period. My bad. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governor_of_Utah
Quote: Originally Posted by Antoine Does it really matter? I'm either going to: 1) punch you in the face or 2) have Neo Convict hold you down while I stick a broomstick up your ass Now, you still think there's no difference?
Quote: Originally Posted by Antoine I disgaree. And I don't think any legal decisions should be made on the basis of something as vague as intent. In the case we are discussing might I agree but intent has its place in law. It makes the difference between first degree murder and manslaughter though the end result, a dead human, is the same.
Quote: Originally Posted by Neo Convict In the case we are discussing might I agree but intent has its place in law. It makes the difference between first degree murder and manslaughter though the end result, a dead human, is the same. I see your point here.
Quote: Originally Posted by Antoine Then you think it is less harmful to be sodomized with a broomstick if the intent was not sexual. So I assume you have no problem with this court's ruling. What? No! Sodomizing someone with a broomstick is sexual whether the boys meant it to be or not (how could they not realize that what they were doing was sexual, that is ridiculous). It should be sexual assault. They should spend time in prison for...
Quote: Originally Posted by Neo Convict If the prosecutors would have taken the "sex" part out of the charges each of these little monsters could have been convicted of 11 counts of assault and various other crimes. Add them all together they would have been in jail into their 60s. Instead they get to walk.... They'd walk either way because one of them is a Senator's son. Isn't that obvious?
Quote: Originally Posted by Neo Convict http://www.rottentomatoes.com/vine/...ad.php?t=474075 Yeah, I already saw that one, it was one of the ones I was referring to. As I do have a dog, the idea of some whack job doing this gets my ire up.
Quote: Originally Posted by Ellen Brent Peacemaker How is this related to Mormons?? ------- EDIT ------- Never mind. I found the connection in the text above. But I don't know of it's either fair or justifiable to associate this crime with ALL Mormons. Thank you Captain Obvious! You get a brand new Obviousness awards!
Thread profile page for "Teens who sodomized 18 11-14 year old boys may avoid jail" on http://www.rottentomatoes.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Teens who sodomized 18 11-14 year old boys may avoid jail", located on the Message Board at http://www.rottentomatoes.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity