I have a 1995 Range Rover Classic LWB 4.2 V8. Its not in good shape, and Im considering replacing it. Would swapping in a 3.9L from an earlier RRCC be a direct swap?
Thanks,
Paul
as long as you change over all the front of the engine stuff (alt, front
cover, water pump,....) and the brackets to hold it all on (assumung it the
older style engine). Other than that it's pretty straight forward. You may
run into some electrical plug ends that are different so you may have to
swap some of that stuff over too. The blocks are the same so fit wise,...
its so easy a caveman could ...
all rover v8 engines share the same bolt pattern 1969 classic up to the 2004 disco series 2....beyond that you have bmw and jaguar two different beasts all together even between them...
the main differences between the 69 to 04 are displacement, electronics and h/p. than you get into pulleys lubrication etc.. but bolt pattern is the same....
If your gonna do an engine swap don't use a 4.2. Those engines are
notorious, for lack of a better term, blowing up. If your gonna swap find a
4.6 they provide alot more kick, almost 300 hp. You will run into some
problems ethier way tho, if it was me i would do the 4.6 and spend the
extra time mating it up to transfer case.
oh wow i compelety misread what you asked. disregard what i said. but i
would still opt for the 4.6 and its a 95 so it would be pretty straight
forward with a 4.6
my current 4.2 has approximately 227K on the clock. But it's glacially slow compared to other vehicles with similar performance specifications.
I just want it to run, and run reliably.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Divied245
It's a rover. I would never have the expectation of it being reliable.
I only ask it to work when there is snow on the ground!:P
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldnDirty
Then it's definately not going to be reliable!!! Remember, snow is just frozen water, and Rovers are afraid of water!
Yeah, coming from a guy who has a picture of a rover going for a swim.
Remember you have to face your fears. My RRC isn't afraid of water, but it has dual carbs.
For the swap, are you going to just swap the block or all the extras too? If your swapping to the v-belts as well, then you won't need to worry about the water pump etc...
All of that being said, what do you mean by being glacially slow? When was the last time it had a tune up? Doing an ...
Quote: Originally Posted by GoGetTheHorzion So series tell me why you wouldnt just go with a 4.6? Its a 95 and im pretty sure the 4.6 would be more direct than the 3.9 would be I'm of the opinion that it would be cost prohibitive, but I'm not 100% sure of how much a 4.6 costs. From what I've read it looks like a $3,000+ proposition versus replacing my 4.2 with a 3.9 for $500.
Well as Paul has suggested, its not quite as simple as a 3.9. I presumed that Parkpy, already had a 3.9. To me its all about cost and availability. No real preference either way, i have driven 3.5 3.9 and 4.6 the 3.5 and 4.6 were both carb the 3.9 efi, I think they all do fine. i do love the torque available with a dual SU 4.6 ( I mean don't get me wrong) Mike
all rover v8 engines share the same bolt pattern 1969 classic up to the 2004 disco series 2....beyond that you have bmw and jaguar two different beasts all together even between them... the main differences between the 69 to 04 are displacement, electronics and h/p. than you get into pulleys lubrication etc.. but bolt pattern is the same....
Look, get a cheap 3.9 and stick it in the truck and be happy. A 4.6 will cost way more that the truck is worth and you will need to do a lot to get it to work in your truck. GEMS or Bosdh 4.6's didn't use distributors so you will need the front engine cover off either your 4.2 or a 3.9. You will also need a new cam to drive the distributor and new lifters. That's only the start. In this case, use the KISS principle and just get...
If you're able to get a complete 3.9, it's virtually a plug & play swap. The fans are different, and you may need to grab the fan shroud from the donor. Even if you want to swap over the serpentine setup to the 3.9, it's still very simple. 4.2L engines have a very underserved reputation. I personally believe very few cranks ever broke, but like all urban legends, the story got told so many times, it began to sound like...
Related threads on "Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum":
Thread profile page for "Swapping out 4.2L V8 for a older 3.9 V8?" on http://www.landroversonly.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Swapping out 4.2L V8 for a older 3.9 V8?", located on the Message Board at http://www.landroversonly.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity