Thread: Suse ext2ext3,and reiserFS

reiserfs & xfs should got better I/O performance compare to default ext3, but less supports by developer, for personal PC go ahead and enjoy but for corporate server no advisable. ext4 should stable down for next few month, it should better than older version of fs.

Hi Experts, I have been google around on which filesystem are more superior. I am using Suse and noticed it was using reiserFS as default filesystem. Somehow reiserFS are not much supported by other 3rd party restore application and it also don support system dump. The only benefit i see was the execution time are more faster in smaller size file. I tot the standard should be using ext3 as default? am i correct? Anyone have experiences on...

change it bro... im new to linux too.... but im doing fine with ext3... now i realised that in sabily 9.04 exists ext4... trying it out for this two days... so far so good....

QUOTE(dRLurve @ Nov 4 2009, 07:32 PM) Hi Experts, I have been google around on which filesystem are more superior. I am using Suse and noticed it was using reiserFS as default filesystem. Somehow reiserFS are not much supported by other 3rd party restore application and it also don support system dump. The only benefit i see was the execution time are more faster in smaller size file. I tot the standard should be using ext3 as...