Thread: Stewart: FOX not news by it's own admission
Started 1 month, 1 week ago by Ronin Tetsuro
A brilliant piece done by Stewart, explaining what many 'liberals' have been trying in vain to explain to 'conservatives' for a long time.
Quote:
"According to Fox, the weekday news programming -- and this is according to Fox -- runs from 9:00 to 4:00 p.m. and from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. for a total of nine newsy hours a day," Stewart notes. "Let me, for the audience...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiver
Nuclear proliferation would end the 'MAD' game, ensuring that nukes are used in coercive relationships. A more interesting question would be "why don't you know?"
Man you guys aren't just oblivious about pot. You are also oblivious to ridicule, apparently.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiver
Nuclear proliferation would end the 'MAD' game, ensuring that nukes are used in coercive relationships.
MAD, was flawed from the start, NUTS was much more realistic. Also, using nukes to coerce does violate someone's rights, but nothing about owning one means you have to use it to...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Ridley
Also, using nukes to coerce does violate someone's rights, but nothing about owning one means you have to use it to coerce.
With proliferation, 'ownership' ensures participation in the 'games' characterised by opportunism and therefore coercive relationships
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiver
With proliferation, 'ownership' ensures participation in the 'games' characterized by opportunism and therefore coercive relationships
English please?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Ridley
English please?
It 'twas! To understand the consequences of nuclear proliferation we have to focus on models of interaction. Game theory provides the ideal means. The MAD equilibria is destroyed and we move towards a world of opportunism
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiver
It 'twas! To understand the consequences of nuclear proliferation we have to focus on models of interaction. Game theory provides the ideal means. The MAD equilibria is destroyed and we move towards a world of opportunism
Answer the question, does OWNING nuclear weapons ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Ridley
Answer the question, does OWNING nuclear weapons violate anybody's rights?
Ownership ensures the game is played. Given MAD does not operate, coercion will be the standard outcome
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Ridley
What 'game'?
I've already informed you that, to understand interaction, we'd need an approach such as 'game theory'.
Quote: Originally Posted by CIAagent11 Roy, we can't judge about unequal opportunity by looking at outcome. "This guy has 100$, this guy has 50$, he mush have had unequal opportunity." How do you know that? To a large extent, we can judge about unequal opportunity by looking at outcomes if we examine the statistical distribution of outcomes, not merely by comparing two individual outcomes. Every society studied has an...
Quote: Originally Posted by My Fing ID What if the image drawn was not racist in intent, is it still racist. We're sort of blurring two concepts. A person can be a racist or not, and something they express can carry a racist meaning or not. A non-racist can express something that is racist without intending it to be racist. That doesn't make the thing they are expressing any less racist, but if they didn't realize what the...
Quote: Originally Posted by Ferris Wealth is I'm sure not what he meant by "benefiting society." Usually wealth creation is the argument for deregulation not regulation. Regulation ensures a higher standard of living, lower volatility in the marketplace, less manipulation by those with economic power (leading to less income disparity). In the very long term, these theoretically lead to more wealth creation than...
Quote: Originally Posted by squidward Our education system has prepared a generation of soft americans to expect a cushy life based on endless flows of cheap credit, spiraling asset values and littel work. Congratulations. They will be very hungry. Where the hell have you been. My education hasn't been soft. None of my teaches ever batted an eye when they gave me a C- on a test. Its just more Conservative masturbation against the...
Quote: Originally Posted by OneThunder Ding Ding Ding Ding! We have a winner Johnny! Give this man a prize! That pretty much sums up the OP perfectly, doesn't it?
Quote: Originally Posted by Bill_in_Bethlehem what i gather from this is that 91% of black people know next to nothing about politics ..... Quote: Originally Posted by Agent Zero John Kerry is clearly black.
Quote: Originally Posted by stroll No, this clearly is not my point. Read again. No, that was what you wrote. Whether or not you intended to mean that is your own fault.
Quote: Originally Posted by Europe Rick If the 4th, 5th, 6th and 8th Amendments were repealed would that empower the government to search, seize and arrest without warrant, coerce confessions, declare guilt without trial and then immediately hang, draw and quarter the offender in the town square? It would enable the Govt to pass laws to do that. Quote: Striking from the Constitution the words, upon which the right does not depend, would not...
Jon Stewart: Fox News Thinks Obama & Chavez Touched... Jon Stewart: Fox News Thinks Obama & Chavez Touched Wieners: Jon Stewart exposes the gang at Fox News whipping t.. http://tinyurl.com/cl5hft about 12 hours ago from twitterfeed
Thread profile page for "Stewart: FOX not news by it's own admission" on http://www.politicalforum.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Stewart: FOX not news by it's own admission", located on the Message Board at http://www.politicalforum.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity