Nope. Given that your opponent shuffles, you are allowed one cut.
__________________
Team Iron Chef- If interested in eternals, PM myself or Yare.
Glurman's House of Stuffs!
Extendo!
Spoiler:
Quote:...
You are alowed to cut/shuffle your opponents deck after he/she has presented it after shuffling it him/her self.
You are not allowed to cut/shuffle your own deck after an opponent has cut/shuffled your deck after presenting
You are alowed to cut/shuffle your opponents deck after he/she has presented it after shuffling it him/her self.
You are not allowed to cut/shuffle your own deck after an opponent has cut/shuffled your deck after presenting
__________________
MTG rules advisor
It's not that there is a rule that prohibits it, it's that there isn't a rule that allows you to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comp Rules.
103.1. At the start of a game, each player shuffles his or her deck so that the cards are in a random order. Each player may then shuffle or cut his or her opponents’ decks. The players’ decks become...
It's not that there is a rule that prohibits it, it's that there isn't a rule that allows you to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comp Rules.
103.1. At the start of a game, each player shuffles his or her deck so that the cards are in a random order. Each player may then shuffle or ...
Actually, that rule you referenced does prohibit it.
You shuffle deck, and present to opponent.
Opponent shuffles deck.
Deck then becomes library.
Library can only be shuffled, when instructed to by game event.
Actually no, there is only one rule that prohibits something (the land drop rule), all the others give permission. The only thing that prohibits you from shuffling whenever you want is the premise that you can't do anything without permission.
Thus, you can note there is no rule that states "you may not shuffle your library unless instructed" but by the nature of the rules, as you can't do ...
Actually no, there is only one rule that prohibits something (the land drop rule), all the others give permission. The only thing that prohibits you from shuffling whenever you want is the premise that you can't do anything without permission.
Thus, you can note there is no rule that states "you may not shuffle your library unless ...
Quote: Originally Posted by azngenius You might not even need the opponent to shuffle again... does anyone have any input? I can see both pros and cons for allowing the opponent to shuffle after this cut. I'm more likely to just let the deck stand as is, though I'd expect that to differ for each judge who were to handle such a situation. YMMV.
Quote: Originally Posted by Yamikiri But am I right to assume that you can do this finite times? It's frustrating, I already told you absolutely not. Are you going to quote this post and ask again? Their shuffle is final.
Quote: Originally Posted by onlainari It's frustrating, I already told you absolutely not. Are you going to quote this post and ask again? Their shuffle is final. Still people are giving me conflicting answers - I'll trust this answer for now until some one gives credible evidence to the contrary. Trust all the citations. Disliking an answer is not a reason to prolong a thread by calling all these official citations incorrect. -Woap
Actually no, there is only one rule that prohibits something (the land drop rule), all the others give permission. The only thing that prohibits you from shuffling whenever you want is the premise that you can't do anything without permission. Thus, you can note there is no rule that states "you may not shuffle your library unless instructed" but by the nature of the rules, as you can't do something unless you have...
Well, I was apparently using an obsolete method. But I could have sworn I saw the additional cut occur on the video footage of PTQ Austin top 8. Ah well, new rules is new rules.
You are alowed to cut/shuffle your opponents deck after he/she has presented it after shuffling it him/her self. You are not allowed to cut/shuffle your own deck after an opponent has cut/shuffled your deck after presenting
I was under the impression that it used to be that if your opponent shuffled your deck you were allowed to cut it afterwards, but now the rules state that the opponent always gets the last cut of your deck to prevent any crazy stacking shenanigans.
This came up at Game Days while I was judging actually. What is the appropriate penalty for a player who cuts his/her deck after an opponent shuffles it? There was no intention of cheating.
Related threads on "MTG Salvation - Powered by vBulletin":
Thread profile page for "Shuffling and cutting" on http://forums.mtgsalvation.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Shuffling and cutting", located on the Message Board at http://forums.mtgsalvation.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity