Welcome Junnie!
First of all, are you trying to start a reasonable debate or get on a soap box? The wording of your debate seems to indicate the latter.
Secondly, I did not do CIO until my DD was over 12 months. However my way is not the only way. You cant argue with results I say. If a child who has CIO since day one is happy, bright and healthy who am I to argue with that. I personally ...
I didn't let my son CIO until he was about 14 months old. Around this time he decided that he didn't want to nap anymore and was totally melting down by around 5pm, but putting him to bed then only had him waking up at 4am ready to play.
I put him in his bed and let him fuss and would go in every 5 minutes and say "Time to sleep. Goodnight Christian." The first day he didn't sleep but after...
I'm not against CIO by any means, but I don't see it as the best, most necessary tool in *most* circumstances.
I guess we did a form of CIO when lil M was 19 months old. He wanted to nurse all night long, and one night I decided we were done. We co-slept so instead of nursing I just rocked him and sang to him until he fell asleep. The first night he cried for maybe 20 minutes, 2nd night ...
We did CIO and it worked for us. Of course, the down side to is was that when she started teething again I had to start all over because I wasn't going to let her cry when she was in pain. Now the only time I have to let her cry is if I lay her down for a nap without letting her fall asleep first. She cries for maybe five minutes, if that, and lays down and goes to sleep. She doesn't hate me ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by AddiesMomma
We did CIO and it worked for us. Of course, the down side to is was that when she started teething again I had to start all over because I wasn't going to let her cry when she was in pain. Now the only time I have to let her cry is if I lay her down for a nap without letting her fall asleep first...
I am against CIO. I feel, as others have said in the past, that a child cries because they need/want something. By not responding, the child doesn't understand that you only want them to go to sleep. I FEEL that they feel ignored and helpless, sitting in a crib.
This is all for babies under a year. I have let Emily (at 2) cry in her room because she knows it's bed time, and she's trying to ...
Nothing about the presentation of this topic suggests it is a "debate," although perhaps an argument may ensue. In answer to the question presented, I think "you" should do whatever you are comfortable doing. Sociologically, medically, and traditionally (anthropologically?) speaking, many arguments against CIO can be made, but I also think there are good reasons to allow a child to CIO.
I ...
I'm not opposed to it at all, and have done it on a few occasions.
I think that this is definitely one of those things that depends on the child. My daughter has slept through the night since the day she was born, so I may not be the best person to put my two cents in but oh well.
The only time she's had trouble with sleeping through the night has been when her 8th tooth was coming ...
I am not yet a mother, but I think that anything that has good end results is fine. I will happily have my baby CIO when I feel he/she is old enough. Perhaps around 9 to 14 months I will begin. I feel a child needs to learn to comfort himself rather then always rely on someone else.
I too feel that the OP isn't really wanting a debate. Not put very well.
We did CIO, from when Shelby was around 6 months. Shelby's always been a good sleeper, and before putting her down, I would feed her, change her diaper, and make sure she was comfortable, so that I had peace of mind about her needs. When she cried, it was because she was tired. She cried about 30 minutes the first time we did it, and I went in after about 15, to make sure she wasn't wet/poopy,...
Semantics. But babies are a 24-hour job. The baby's not OK on his own for 5 hours... someone's doing the job. It's a shared position, maybe, is a better way of putting it. I work it most of the time, and my husband kicks in some of his time, and my mother-in-law works now and then, too. But the baby never stops being a baby, nor ceases to need care and attention. -- Andrea in New Mexico considers that it's the only job...
Quote: Originally Posted by Misty Also, the study posted above, no where does it say this study was done on CIO. Quote: To evaluate a standardized sleep programme that is a two-step variation of graduated extinction Quote: The Ferber methodalso known as graduated extinctionis perhaps the most well-known sleep training program for children. http://www.parentingscience.com/Ferber-method.html
I will jump up from a toilet mid-poop if a child needs my immediate care (yes, with poop dangling), I will skip meals, spend sleepless nights, ignore friendships, and put aside my own vanity, entertainment and flippin' pride to tend to my children, but when you have more than one or if you have one of the more 'challenging' sort, or you are a working mother be it part-time or full-time, no, you are not at every one of your...
Quote: Originally Posted by OrangeblossomB Maybe parenting is more like one of those jobs... you are "on the job" 24/7, as you do not stop being a parent, but... there is downtime. Yeah I can agree with that
Quote: Originally Posted by Carolyn I think we're going off topic here, but I'm still going to add something. Here's my argument that parenting is not a 24hour job. In any 'job' you are required to work all that time. When I go to work at 9am apart from my designated rest times I work solidly through to 5pm. So with that in mind if I had a 24hour job, yes I still have 'designated rest times' but you...
Quote: Originally Posted by Sign Of The Fish Burger I still can't wrap my brain around the fact that some of you don't think parenting is a 24/7 job... Sure there are times when I tell DH that I'm going to take a bath, so watch the little one... but even during times like that I'm still a Mom. If something happened my bath would end and I'd take care of her. Same with leaving her with a sitter- I'm still a Mom...
Quote: Originally Posted by Sign Of The Fish Burger I still can't wrap my brain around the fact that some of you don't think parenting is a 24/7 job... Sure there are times when I tell DH that I'm going to take a bath, so watch the little one... but even during times like that I'm still a Mom. If something happened my bath would end and I'd take care of her. Same with leaving her with a sitter- I'm still a Mom...
Quote: Originally Posted by JBarlow I am up because my almost 6 year old woke me up hysterical. He had an accident in bed, needed to be cleaned up, have his bed changed and was in pain from growing. After tylenol, a 30 min leg rub by mom and getting cleaned up he is back asleep. The fact that I was up at this hour due to being a mom made me think of this debate...I thought it was funny. That humor might be lost on anyone but me...which is...
Dr Ferber, the guy who is credited with CIO, defines it like this: Quote: He [Dr. Ferber] recommends following a warm, loving bedtime routine and then putting your baby in bed awake and leaving him (even if he cries) for gradually longer periods of time. Putting a child to bed awake, says Ferber, is crucial to successfully teaching him to go to sleep on his own. Parents are instructed to pat and comfort their baby after each predetermined...
Related threads on "TTC, Trying to Conceive, Pregnancy & Parenting Message Boards - Forums":
Thread profile page for "Should you let your baby CIO (cry it out)?" on http://www.themommyplaybook.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Should you let your baby CIO (cry it out)?", located on the Message Board at http://www.themommyplaybook.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity