Not bullish so much as neutral. He's been bearish on the market for the last 6 years. ANNANDALE, Va. (MarketWatch) -- Stop the presses! Richard Russell, editor of Dow Theory Letters, has turned "totally neutral on the stock market -- at least as to the secondary trend." I nominate this for the understatement of the year award. It actually represents a huge bullish turn for Russell, who ...
This is quite significant... I saw it yesterday and was thinking that the recent run may be even stronger than I thought... Originally posted in thread: 1934
I got a quarter in my pocket that is a good 50/50 "contra-indicator." Send me a check for a thousand, and I will tell you what it predicts. Originally posted in thread: 1934
On the September 6 site I showed a P&F chart of the S&P 500. The chart presented an almost perfect head-and-shoulders bottom pattern. Frankly, the formation surprised me. There's no way I could have ignored that pattern (which nobody else seemed to have identified or at least mentioned). I decided to act on what I saw. So I wrote that if the spot (cash) S&P hits 1250, that would be a major ...
I guess it'd be a good idea next time to preview the post On the September 6 site I showed a P&F chart of the S&P 500. The chart presented an almost perfect head-and-shoulders bottom pattern. Frankly, the formation surprised me. There's no way I could have ignored that pattern (which nobody else seemed to have identified or at least mentioned). I decided to act on what I saw. So I wrote that if...
ran a piece saying that when the big bears - and it named Russell among them - turned bullish, and became the object of scorn, then it would be an indication that the bull rally was near its end. I was former subscriber to Russell but dropped him after seeing how poorly he called the market. Just last April I got a memo from him trying to entice me back to resubscribe and it showed a graph of ...
I don't subscribe to any newsletter. The reason is that HFD has shown pretty clearly that it is really hard to be a consistently good long term performer. There are only a handfull that qualify in this area, and I guess I don't see even their value. But if anyone has any recommendations, I am willing to learn. Thanks. Originally posted in thread: 1934
I was former subscriber to Russell but dropped him after seeing how poorly he called the market Like in 1999 when he told his subscribers to invest in gold stocks which went up 5 to 10 to 20 folds in just 4 years? Why don't you mention that too, or did you forget? - Oh Originally posted in thread: 1934
Yeah... I don't subscribe to Russell but I do pay attention (if I can get some free articles on his thoughts). I don't think you can assume that he, or anyone else, is going to be correct all the time. Russell has been more right than wrong (According to Mark Hulbert of HFD, he has the 2nd best performing newsletter--although this may be skewed towards the 70's and 80's). Even the analysts on ...
I was former subscriber to Russell but dropped him after seeing how poorly he called the market Like in 1999 when he told his subscribers to invest in gold stocks which went up 5 to 10 to 20 folds in just 4 years? Why don't you mention that too, or did you forget? - Oh Originally posted in thread: 1934
Yeah... I don't subscribe to Russell but I do pay attention (if I can get some free articles on his thoughts). I don't think you can assume that he, or anyone else, is going to be correct all the time. Russell has been more right than wrong (According to Mark Hulbert of HFD, he has the 2nd best performing newsletter--although this may be skewed towards the 70's and 80's). Even the analysts on Wall Street don't get...
I don't subscribe to any newsletter. The reason is that HFD has shown pretty clearly that it is really hard to be a consistently good long term performer. There are only a handfull that qualify in this area, and I guess I don't see even their value. But if anyone has any recommendations, I am willing to learn. Thanks. Originally posted in thread: 1934
Not bullish so much as neutral. He's been bearish on the market for the last 6 years. ANNANDALE, Va. (MarketWatch) -- Stop the presses! Richard Russell, editor of Dow Theory Letters, has turned "totally neutral on the stock market -- at least as to the secondary trend." I nominate this for the understatement of the year award. It actually represents a huge bullish turn for Russell, who has been almost exclusively bearish for six...
ran a piece saying that when the big bears - and it named Russell among them - turned bullish, and became the object of scorn, then it would be an indication that the bull rally was near its end. I was former subscriber to Russell but dropped him after seeing how poorly he called the market. Just last April I got a memo from him trying to entice me back to resubscribe and it showed a graph of the NYSE composite index and Russell's...
Thread profile page for "Russell/Dow Theory turns Bullish..." on http://www.morningstar.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Russell/Dow Theory turns Bullish...", located on the Message Board at http://www.morningstar.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity