Thread: Quickies

SherrieG wrote: That's why these particular Seals are counting on, Sarge. Counting on what? Their own countrymen believing them, over the enemy? Well! I believe them. Who do you believe?

What an amazing story from one of NeoGeog's photographers. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zxa6P73Awcg

I'm imagining Turd Blossom with a camera. But doing the polka could work, too...

bacchys wrote: Miz Robbie wrote: AZKC wrote: I think we have far too little information to be making any judgements on this one way or the other. When did an absence of information ever get in our way of making judgments? Chuck can be something of a wet blanket at times. That demand for rationality, and opinions grounded in facts, and all that stuff? Yeah, he sucks all the joy out of it.

NoOneFamous wrote: No Hank, what I am saying is that the truth will be established at the courts-martial. Maybe it will, maybe it won't. I have doubts that this will come to trial, but I could be wrong. Sanity seems to be in short supply nowadays. At this time, reports are all over the map. One version has the snitch being a Master at Arms, the Navy equivilent of military policeman, not a fellow SEAL as first reported. Other sources...

SherrieG wrote: Heh NeoGeo? There's a joke in there somewhere... Or a EuroPop dance tune...

Okay, guys, and I emphasize guys, Chuck is right. This is just turning into another tired old pissing match. Boring. Spoken by one who has bored people by getting goaded into a pissing match more than once.

NoOneFamous wrote: The woman is a Republican teabagger right? No wonder she can't spell. You really took the time to post that?

But I still hold the anti-regulation theology prevalent throughout the conservative ideology responsible for so much of what happened. In an anti-regulatory vacuum, corporate leaders move in quickly to create mayhem. Lis

Aw heck, thanks, you big ol' sherriff, you! *giggle*