Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: Q6600 Vs Q9550

Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago by pl4tinum
Hello there fellow LYNers well as the topic says, i'm currently using the q6600 and have been considering a small upgrade to the 45nm Q9550. I've been reading various reviews around the internet but i wanted to see if there was anyone here who has actually used both of these procs and give me some advice on whether the upgrade is worth it. In terms of usage, i do all sorts of ...
Site: Lowyat.NET - Insanely Addictive  Lowyat.NET - Insanely Addictive - site profile
Forum: Hardware Questions & Answers  Hardware Questions & Answers - forum profile
Total authors: 19 authors
Total thread posts: 76 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: lowyat.net

Other posts in this thread:

kilowatt replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
QUOTE(geforce88 @ Nov 7 2009, 10:51 PM) Q9550 is better than Q6600 technically, but not much difference even though under OC... if its i5 or i7, then different lah... well said i think ...but maybe bit diff in terms of proc temps... This post has been edited by kilowatt : Yesterday, 10:56 PM

geforce88 replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Q9550 is better than Q6600 technically, but not much difference even though under OC... if its i5 or i7, then different lah...

kilowatt replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
QUOTE(geforce88 @ Nov 7 2009, 10:51 PM) Q9550 is better than Q6600 technically, but not much difference even though under OC... if its i5 or i7, then different lah... well said i think ...but maybe bit diff in terms of proc temps... This post has been edited by kilowatt : Nov 7 2009, 10:56 PM

zulboydarn replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
thats y i said that intel going to stop producing 1156...well in theory... since i9 will release on 1336 platform... well we can see i3 oso but still we can say that 1336 got a lil bit advantage on delivering d high end cpu aite..?

Irishcoffee replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
why i3 will be on x58? tat imppossible ppl going buy a cheap proc with a expensive mobo??

Racerx replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
if intel stops releasing lga1156 cpu next year,they practically shot themselves and gave amd a huge market as most people don't buy the lga1366 board and cpu that cost rm1700< i3 is still on lga1156 what advantage?full speed pcie?that hardly makes a difference

Racerx replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
yeah,like people will buy mobo that costs 2x the cost of the cpu....... the point is lga1156 is not going to be discontinued before sandy bridge cpus are released

Irishcoffee replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
lol it might be a plan for intel to bankrupt

tech_frix replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
QUOTE(geforce88 @ Nov 7 2009, 10:51 PM) Q9550 is better than Q6600 technically, but not much difference even though under OC... if its i5 or i7, then different lah... explain technically pls....

ndgoh replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Do you really need to upgrade? Whats TS full system specs?

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
InFe_eD
16
user's latest post:
Q6600 Vs Q9550
Published (2009-11-08 23:00:00)
Cool Racer, we all know who's the rational 1 here, Don't resort to argue with idiots like I do, coz I couldnt help
tech_frix
10
user's latest post:
Q6600 Vs Q9550
Published (2009-11-08 23:01:00)
QUOTE(asamkipas &#064; Nov 9 2009, 10:36 PM) i dont think 775 will be gone that fast ...just see garage sales,any socket 775 mobo still sells fast,prices of Core 2 Duo procs are still high and even Intel themselves came out a new budget proc in the form of Pentium Dual Core E6300,so 775 still has life in it.. yup... sc 775 mobo and proc surely got loads of user nowadays... i dont think it will dissapear next year... maybe 5 years time......
Racerx
9
user's latest post:
Q6600 Vs Q9550
Published (2009-11-08 22:48:00)
then what's intel going to sell for the masses?they are not stupid to only sell expensive parts that most people don't buy.the only real benefit of x58 is the i9,now tell me,are you going to spend more than 2k for the i9 ?
zulboydarn
6
user's latest post:
Q6600 Vs Q9550
Published (2009-11-08 22:44:00)
i know...what i meant was, y need to different socket aite?? better stick to 1... so in this case, 1156 cater low end CPU rather than 1336... so there is a chance that 1156 will be obsolete next year...
pl4tinum
5
user's latest post:
Q6600 Vs Q9550
Published (2009-11-08 21:37:00)
Yeah i've been thinking about maybe changing to i7 for quite a while already but then again maybe i'll keep my money until i9 launches? =D Just considering whether a small proc upgrade will be worth it.
hilmiangah
5
user's latest post:
Q6600 Vs Q9550
Published (2009-11-08 09:49:00)
QUOTE(pl4tinum &#064; Nov 9 2009, 09:36 AM) Er guys can calm down a bit? I just wanted to get some info ler let's not get hostile with one another okay? Just to clarify some of teh questions my specs are as follows: Proc : 6600 @ 3.6 Mobo: EP45 UD3R Ram: 4 X 1GB Corsair DDR2 6400 Currently trying to get my proc to 4GHz but get BSOD till very sien even with very small fsb increases thats why i'm thinking of changing proc's....
geforce88
4
user's latest post:
Q6600 Vs Q9550
Published (2009-11-08 22:04:00)
QUOTE(soundsyst64 &#064; Nov 9 2009, 04:45 AM) if TS want to wait to collect enough money for future CPUs, Q9550 is a go. It can serves you for next 3-5 years yup, agree with this... even now ppl are still craving for procs like e8400, q6600, q9550 etc... and socket 775 mobo are still selling like hot cake....
seanlimys
3
user's latest post:
Q6600 Vs Q9550
Published (2009-11-08 22:28:00)
s1156 replacement for s775 s1366 is like s423 for p4..s1156 is like s478 for p4..
TitaniumZ
3
user's latest post:
Q6600 Vs Q9550
Published (2009-11-08 14:46:00)
QUOTE(pl4tinum &#064; Nov 9 2009, 02:34 PM) i'm not really a very hardcore overclocker in any sense lar. I just overclock a bit during my spare time but i don't know about you ppl but for me i feel that 4 GHz is some kind of achievement that i have to get before i change platforms gua. =D My Q6600 has been stuck at 3.6 for quite a while and am still trying to get it stable when pushing it past that mark. That's the main...
Irishcoffee
3
user's latest post:
Q6600 Vs Q9550
Published (2009-11-08 04:56:00)
45 vs 65 nm clock to clock performance diff is around 5-6% i would say q9550 is around 15% faster thn q66 only

Related threads on "Lowyat.NET - Insanely Addictive":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "Q6600 Vs Q9550" on http://lowyat.net. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Q6600 Vs Q9550", located on the Message Board at http://lowyat.net. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity