Thread: Public option, motherfucker

schwerve wrote: I'm pro-choice, but I still can't understand why an abortion should be covered by basic care health insurance at all. abortion, under its legal definition, is considered an elective procedure (as crass at that sounds), why should federally subsidized insurance pay for elective procedures? there are plenty of cases where an abortion is no longer considered elective, health of the mother, rape, incest etc, but my...

Fletch wrote: “H.R. 3962 provides that an individual (or a husband and wife in the case of a joint return) who does not, at any time during the taxable year, maintain acceptable health insurance coverage for himself or herself and each of his or her qualifying children is subject to an additional tax.” [Page 1] ... “If the government determines that the taxpayer’s unpaid tax liability results from willful behavior, the following penalties...

Cartola wrote: he is so moved when he is like 'everyone in your neighborhood starts fighting and you didn't know why' amazing Cut a deal.

grammatron ,

***also deleted on account of my roommate being an idiot*** Last edited by The Dirty Turtle on Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:41 am; edited 1 time in total

Buzz Fledderjohn wrote: i would love to hear the inevitable slyly menacing phone call that biden decides to give senator joementum this week Quote: LIEBERMAN: A public option plan is unnecessary. It has been put forward, I'm convinced, by people who really want the government to take over all of health insurance. They've got a right to do that; I think that would be wrong. But worse than that, we have a problem even greater than the...

no he should worry he'll be first _________________ Ifnkovhgroghprm on 31OCT08 wrote: nc too close to call, mccain making huge gains in PA, national trackers tightening it's over for obama

Mesh wrote: You left out 40% of the increase in cost. Yeah, O.K. You're a verified idiot about this stuff. The extra 40%, increase in the money supply? Decrease in beds per capita? Decrease in doctors per capita?

seriously i wanna have some fun at a teabagger rally. it'd just be too much fun.

it is a legal medical procedure, why should it not be allowed to be under insurance that someone pays for, whether that is aided by the competitiveness of government or not. because its "controversial" there should be no consideration?