Thread: “Our office recently concluded that the Fourth Amendment had no application to domestic military operations,”...

I'm not sure you understand what I just said. I certainly don't understand what you just said. Whether or not I put Bush in jail (you know I personally cannot do that, right?) is not what gives me the ability to talk. I have the Constitutional right to do that. At no point did I even say I supported putting Bush in jail, you're projecting that on to me. So at this point, if I were having a conversation with you in real life, I...

So prosecute Bush then, if not, shut up.

If there's no constitution then there's no authority for them to do what they're do and no one has to respect it. If there's no law then it's every man for himself

Just cuz you axed so nice: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/a4cc9/why_does_our_society_seem_to_reward_mediocrity/c0fsk0d

I love how this was just 5 days before the US invaded Iraq to make it "democratic" .

Don't bring race into a political debate, there is no purpose for it.

I need to read things like this everytime I become disillusioned with President Obama for the things that he hasn't done yet. Thankfully, Obama's Justice Department is disavowing Bush's approach to domestic military operations.

The 4th Amendment "has no application" because the Posse Comitatus Act from 1878 should keep the feds from using troops as police internally. The previous adminitration's view was "the War on Terra trumps that law, so why wouldn't it also trump the Constitution?" The article seems to say the new administration is reversing this policy. (You did read the article before you commented, didn't you, folks?)

"Our office recently concluded that the Fourth Amendment had no application to domestic military operations," the constitution being ground under the heel of fascism.