My changes to that list were -1 Broodmate Dragon, -1 Terminate, +1
Maelstrom Pulse, +1 Resounding Thunder. In the board I switched Duress with
Great Sable Stag, -1 Jund Charm and -1 Pyroclasm for +2 Terminate. So far
I'm 8-2-1 with this list over the course of 3 tournaments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshmilliken2001
My changes to that list were -1 Broodmate Dragon, -1 Terminate, +1 Maelstrom Pulse, +1 Resounding Thunder. In the board I switched Duress with Great Sable Stag, -1 Jund Charm and -1 Pyroclasm for +2 Terminate. So far I'm 8-2-1 with this list over the course of 3 tournaments....
Hey, this is my current decklist that i've been messing around with. pretty standard. I would love to hear what you guys have to say the sideboard. im not sure what to add/ takeout. Same goes with the MD. Tell me what you guys think!
Deck CREATURES: (17) 4x Putrid Leech 4x Sprouting Thrinax 4x Bloodbraid Elf 3x Great Sable Stag 2x Broodmate Dragon ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by taj_gooba
BruWins , can you please explain why your card choices better and why your deck is better than the OP's deck, based on the the current meta game?
As cool as resounding thunder is, (another bolt to cascade into, and unstoppable 6dmg to the dome), i was unimpressed with its ...
Garruk gives +2 mana for cycling Resounding Thunder, so you can potentially cycle it on turn 6. 6 Lands + Garruk isn't that hard with the amount of lands in Jund. Also, it's just an OPTION.
I just tested 2 maindeck Resounding for the first time. I like them. I was able to hard-cycle it once late-game for the win (no Garruk!) It also gives another damage option, supplementing 4 Bolt + 4 ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParticleMan
Garruk gives +2 mana for cycling Resounding Thunder, so you can potentially cycle it on turn 6. 6 Lands + Garruk isn't that hard with the amount of lands in Jund. Also, it's just an OPTION.
I just tested 2 maindeck Resounding for the first time. I like them. I was able to hard-cycle it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by lubby1010
The problem with using Garruk to ramp into Resounding Thunder is that it can only be done on your turn, which i think is significantly worse then being able to do it at their EOT or during combat to take out a creature that could potentially be more of a problem than it was during your turn (for ...
I love it how so many people are thinking that we're gonna play rampant growth with a leech staring us down, when we have an answer to putrid leech in our hand as well. I give up.
Quote: Originally Posted by Shmanka It's intuitively obvious, The ability on Leech does not provide more card advantage in any situation then the life total sacraficed is worth. That's a bingo! Quote: We should have stopped debating about this 100's of posts ago, and someone help decide if SGC or MotWH is correct. That is the most undecided factor among people at the moment (and if it isn't, it honestly should be). I...
Quote: Originally Posted by apaulogy His post could hardly be construed as an argument...no real content, one fact, no substantiating evidence. Just, "hmmmm" I don't think he was saying it was correct...as a matter of fact, based on what I've seen from his posts, he has a grasp on the game himself (ie not needing authoritative nods) and was probably curiously hmmm.ing. It is curious that someone would want to cut...
Quote: Originally Posted by Panosl X spells and cascade spells are not a match made in heaven. You always want to maximise the strength of your cascades in this deck, running Lavalanche and cards like it equate into far more horrible cascades and then you losing. Hence, no it doesn't work. Maybe in a midrange deck with no cascade spells, but not Jund. AAAHHHH thats right. Forgot about that.
I don't have it mentioned in the report, but I did board in Duress against RDW. It hit what would have been a game-ending Banefire on the next turn. Reason was because I was taking out a Broodmate, 3 Garruk, the 3 Pulses, and replacing with 2 Burst, 3 Jund Charm, and 2 Duress. Pulse was just not going to touch anything he played, and duress could at the very least hit a burn spell. They helped beat the polymorph deck, since I remember...
Quote: Originally Posted by Forgotten_Hope My friend Tom...won the NY states with this deck. He told me he had absolutely NO mana problems Then he was lucky. 8 CIPT + 7 Conditional duals? looks like a freaking mess. I like 3/2 flying for 3, and the 1B unearth, if nothing else to help against slow mid-to-late game powerhouses like 5-color cascade. I just don't know if it's worth what is lost. While I am caring about Bit Blast less...
Thread profile page for "[Official Thread] Jund Aggro" on http://forums.mtgsalvation.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "[Official Thread] Jund Aggro", located on the Message Board at http://forums.mtgsalvation.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity