It's been a while since my friends and I took a math class, and I need to settle an argument. Here's the basic setup:
There are 100 people in a community. Every year, 5 out of 100 people will get sick (in other words, the chance of getting sick in a given year is 5%).
My question is this x96; letx92;s say we want to extend this over 10 years. At this scale, will one person have a 50% chance...
Hmm, well I'm not sure how to account for the possibility of people getting sick repeatedly.
If we were to assume that each person would only get sick ONCE, then you'd just multiply the population by 95% each year to get the number of healthy folks.
End Yr 1: 95 people
Yr 2: 90.25
Yr 3: 85.74
Yr 4: 81.45
Yr 5: 77.38
Yr 6: 73.51
Yr 7: 69.83
Yr 8: 66.34
Yr 9: 63.02
Yr 10: 59.87 ...
I can't even think of this in a precise mathematical way for some reason.
What about accounting for population growth or the variables as to why people are getting sick, what they are getting sick with...
Why would it be assumed that the scale would go up to 50% over 10 years in the first place? If the rate is increasing at that level, then I assume you were thinking the population would...
No, it's much simpler than that. The population stays at 100, and the chance stays at 5% every year. I just wanted to know what the chance was, over ten years, of one person getting sick - the 50% was me multiplying 5% by 10 years (but I wasn't sure if that was right).
Bear in mind, it's not about the actual scenario, it's just about the math (don't make it too complicated!).
Bear in mind, it's not about the actual scenario, it's just about the math (don't make it too complicated!).
Haha! I do have that problem at times.
Well is that first answer by Heidi correct?
Starting with 95 people I was then going to multiply that by .05 and then you get 4.75 which you subtract from the 95 and it equals 90.25 and that is the same as what Heidi answered for the ...
you have to look at this like an odds probablity because thats what it is.
So you have a 5% chance to get sick ever year, thats a 1 in 20 chance, over 10 years.
Look at it the same way you would treat rolling a 20 sided die ten times, what are the odds that at some point you are going to roll a 1-5 within 10 rolls.
So the first year you have a 1 in 20 chance of getting sick but the odds over ...
Of course what gilliking is doing is statistical nonsense. Every year is unique. It is possible that the same 5% get sick every year, because they are weak. This kind of math drives our taxes through the roof.
Statistically, we have x population and y crimes commited by x. Realistically, the crimes are being comitted by the same people over and over, thus skewing the numbers.
I am not ...
Bear in mind, it's not about the actual scenario, it's just about the math (don't make it too complicated!). Haha! I do have that problem at times. Well is that first answer by Heidi correct? Starting with 95 people I was then going to multiply that by .05 and then you get 4.75 which you subtract from the 95 and it equals 90.25 and that is the same as what Heidi answered for the following year. If I was to continue to do so,...
Hmm, well I'm not sure how to account for the possibility of people getting sick repeatedly. If we were to assume that each person would only get sick ONCE, then you'd just multiply the population by 95% each year to get the number of healthy folks. End Yr 1: 95 people Yr 2: 90.25 Yr 3: 85.74 Yr 4: 81.45 Yr 5: 77.38 Yr 6: 73.51 Yr 7: 69.83 Yr 8: 66.34 Yr 9: 63.02 Yr 10: 59.87 healthy people. Which would leave 40-41 sick people. But,...
you have to look at this like an odds probablity because thats what it is. So you have a 5% chance to get sick ever year, thats a 1 in 20 chance, over 10 years. Look at it the same way you would treat rolling a 20 sided die ten times, what are the odds that at some point you are going to roll a 1-5 within 10 rolls. So the first year you have a 1 in 20 chance of getting sick but the odds over 10 years works like the : X= Overall chance to get...
it stays at 5% unless that person increased his or her risk factors in risky behavior (jumping off a clif ,smoking ,eating too much, laisyness, or has suicidal tendancies..)
Of course what gilliking is doing is statistical nonsense. Every year is unique. It is possible that the same 5% get sick every year, because they are weak. This kind of math drives our taxes through the roof. Statistically, we have x population and y crimes commited by x. Realistically, the crimes are being comitted by the same people over and over, thus skewing the numbers. I am not proposing this, but, if parole was halted, and people...
Ken Jennings' New Year math question:... Ken Jennings' New Year math question: http://ken-jennings.com/blo... If I were teaching math now, I'd use it in algebra class. 9:42 PM Jan 1st from web
Math question, and please don't flame me, this is not a... Math question, and please don't flame me, this is not a VB. I have a DD who
happens to be good at and enjoys math, so I've been doing math with her at
home on our own. She is not in K yet. We are approaching the point of
double digits and I just read in a
Just got this MUST-SEE "engineering math... Just got this MUST-SEE "engineering math question" from my brother: http://is.gd/sXHS Not just for math geeks ... really!! 8:14 AM Apr 17th from web
Thread profile page for "Math Question" on http://www.imdb.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Math Question", located on the Message Board at http://www.imdb.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity