Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: Math Question

Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago by LastStandingD
It's been a while since my friends and I took a math class, and I need to settle an argument. Here's the basic setup: There are 100 people in a community. Every year, 5 out of 100 people will get sick (in other words, the chance of getting sick in a given year is 5%). My question is this x96; letx92;s say we want to extend this over 10 years. At this scale, will one person have a 50% chance...
Site: IMDb :: Main Boards  IMDb :: Main Boards - site profile
Forum: The Sandbox  The Sandbox - forum profile
Total authors: 8 authors
Total thread posts: 12 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: imdb.com

Other posts in this thread:

Heidi_Smiles replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Hmm, well I'm not sure how to account for the possibility of people getting sick repeatedly. If we were to assume that each person would only get sick ONCE, then you'd just multiply the population by 95% each year to get the number of healthy folks. End Yr 1: 95 people Yr 2: 90.25 Yr 3: 85.74 Yr 4: 81.45 Yr 5: 77.38 Yr 6: 73.51 Yr 7: 69.83 Yr 8: 66.34 Yr 9: 63.02 Yr 10: 59.87 ...

Some_Like_It_Uncreative replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
(1-0.05)^10 Google tells me that is just under 60%. http://tinyurl.com/2e9rru

LastStandingD replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
The question *does* account for people getting sick more than once - does that change anything?

MsPhantasmagoria replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
I can't even think of this in a precise mathematical way for some reason. What about accounting for population growth or the variables as to why people are getting sick, what they are getting sick with... Why would it be assumed that the scale would go up to 50% over 10 years in the first place? If the rate is increasing at that level, then I assume you were thinking the population would...

LastStandingD replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
No, it's much simpler than that. The population stays at 100, and the chance stays at 5% every year. I just wanted to know what the chance was, over ten years, of one person getting sick - the 50% was me multiplying 5% by 10 years (but I wasn't sure if that was right). Bear in mind, it's not about the actual scenario, it's just about the math (don't make it too complicated!).

MsPhantasmagoria replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Bear in mind, it's not about the actual scenario, it's just about the math (don't make it too complicated!). Haha! I do have that problem at times. Well is that first answer by Heidi correct? Starting with 95 people I was then going to multiply that by .05 and then you get 4.75 which you subtract from the 95 and it equals 90.25 and that is the same as what Heidi answered for the ...

gilliking replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
you have to look at this like an odds probablity because thats what it is. So you have a 5% chance to get sick ever year, thats a 1 in 20 chance, over 10 years. Look at it the same way you would treat rolling a 20 sided die ten times, what are the odds that at some point you are going to roll a 1-5 within 10 rolls. So the first year you have a 1 in 20 chance of getting sick but the odds over ...

LastStandingD replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
That seems right - thanks for the help!

jimcat63-1 replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Of course what gilliking is doing is statistical nonsense. Every year is unique. It is possible that the same 5% get sick every year, because they are weak. This kind of math drives our taxes through the roof. Statistically, we have x population and y crimes commited by x. Realistically, the crimes are being comitted by the same people over and over, thus skewing the numbers. I am not ...

scatter-gun replied 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Using the facts you have given us, then it will always be 5%. thats how it started and without more facts, thats how it will end

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
LastStandingD
4
user's latest post:
Math Question
Published (2009-11-09 19:34:00)
That seems right - thanks for the help!
MsPhantasmagoria
2
user's latest post:
Math Question
Published (2009-11-08 10:46:00)
Bear in mind, it's not about the actual scenario, it's just about the math (don't make it too complicated!). Haha! I do have that problem at times. Well is that first answer by Heidi correct? Starting with 95 people I was then going to multiply that by .05 and then you get 4.75 which you subtract from the 95 and it equals 90.25 and that is the same as what Heidi answered for the following year. If I was to continue to do so,...
Some_Like_It_Uncreative
1
user's latest post:
Math Question
Published (2009-11-07 22:36:00)
(1-0.05)^10 Google tells me that is just under 60%. http://tinyurl.com/2e9rru
Heidi_Smiles
1
user's latest post:
Math Question
Published (2009-11-07 22:18:00)
Hmm, well I'm not sure how to account for the possibility of people getting sick repeatedly. If we were to assume that each person would only get sick ONCE, then you'd just multiply the population by 95% each year to get the number of healthy folks. End Yr 1: 95 people Yr 2: 90.25 Yr 3: 85.74 Yr 4: 81.45 Yr 5: 77.38 Yr 6: 73.51 Yr 7: 69.83 Yr 8: 66.34 Yr 9: 63.02 Yr 10: 59.87 healthy people. Which would leave 40-41 sick people. But,...
gilliking
1
user's latest post:
Math Question
Published (2009-11-08 19:20:00)
you have to look at this like an odds probablity because thats what it is. So you have a 5% chance to get sick ever year, thats a 1 in 20 chance, over 10 years. Look at it the same way you would treat rolling a 20 sided die ten times, what are the odds that at some point you are going to roll a 1-5 within 10 rolls. So the first year you have a 1 in 20 chance of getting sick but the odds over 10 years works like the : X= Overall chance to get...
davidhillberg
1
user's latest post:
Math Question
Published (2009-11-10 11:16:00)
it stays at 5% unless that person increased his or her risk factors in risky behavior (jumping off a clif ,smoking ,eating too much, laisyness, or has suicidal tendancies..)
scatter-gun
1
user's latest post:
Math Question
Published (2009-11-10 04:15:00)
Using the facts you have given us, then it will always be 5%. thats how it started and without more facts, thats how it will end
jimcat63-1
1
user's latest post:
Math Question
Published (2009-11-10 00:15:00)
Of course what gilliking is doing is statistical nonsense. Every year is unique. It is possible that the same 5% get sick every year, because they are weak. This kind of math drives our taxes through the roof. Statistically, we have x population and y crimes commited by x. Realistically, the crimes are being comitted by the same people over and over, thus skewing the numbers. I am not proposing this, but, if parole was halted, and people...

Related threads on "IMDb :: Main Boards":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "Math Question" on http://www.imdb.com. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Math Question", located on the Message Board at http://www.imdb.com. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity