"The nondiabetic ordinarily maintains blood sugar immaculately within a narrow range—usually between 80 and 100 mg/dl (milligrams per deciliter), with most people hovering near 85 mg/dl. There are times when that range can briefly stretch up or down—as high as 160 mg/dl and as low as 65—but generally, for the nondiabetic, such swings are rare." Dr. Richard Bernstein M.D., F.A.C.E., F.A.C.N., C.W....
I guess this thread is for CGMers only. Non-CGMers have no way of knowing. Once in a blue moon I have 24 hours within 70-120 mg/dl. I can easily monitor this range because my alarms are set at these level. I definitely never had 2 such exceptional days in a row.
No need to guess Helmut. If this thread was intended for CGMers only, I would have put it in the CGM discussion forum (blink blink).
This thread is intended for all Diabetics, even the ones that choose not to wear an extra doohickey thingamabobber.
Thank you for your reply :)
Sorry. I cannot help nagging at non-CGMers. Maybe I get one person to wonder and try it out. My CGM took the sting out of my diabetes. If more diabetics get a CGM the economics will improve, there will be an incentive for CGM manufactures to improve the technology and eventually CGMs will become as common as pumps. I remember my resistance when my doctor forced me to switch from urine strips to ...
Here is a partial list of my "wants" for the MM CGMS:
A. better accuracy (spent almost a month and wasted a ton of time dealing with the MM CMGS problems)
B. more comfort. I have zero issues wearing sets, but even the tiny (relative to the other brands) unit was itchy in hot weather
C. LOUDER ALARMS!!!!!
D. Further transmission distance. The MM unit signal fails to get to the pump if ...
Dave, obviously you are one of the not so few people who are frustrated with the MM CGMS.
I use the DexCom 7+. Let me go through your "wants" list:
A. The DexCom 7+ is accurate enough for me so that I typically prick my fingers only for calibration (twice a day).
B. I don't feel the sensor at all.
C. The alarms are so loud that I use vibrate during the day.
D. Range is not perfect....
Helmut, I've been pretty well convinced that of the 3 brands on the market, the MM is most deficient. Your comments reinforce what others with the Navigator (accuracy-wise) and DexCom 7 have said. For me, it's a matter of I'm right at the saturation limit for how many devices I will carry with me. If the goodness of the Dexcom or Nav could be married with an excellent pump (eliminating a separate...
Dave, I agree that there is no rush. Maybe next year the combo of your dreams will become available. I am also looking at the 7+ as a device to hold me over until something better comes along.
In regard to learning late about 200: I have learned so much about what certain foods do to me that I rarely go over 160 whereas before I would be above 200 on a regular basis. Thus the problem of ...
Between 80 and 120?? - definitely less than 24 hours (like Dave said). Maybe 18 hours like Sarah said. Maybe even once or twice a full 24. Never longer. And I'm a veteran like many here, inching toward my 20th year as a type 1. That would be a range of 40 mg/dL and a standard deviation of close to 10ish, no? Sigh...but a girl can dream.
Now if you increased that to between 65 and 160 (those ...
I must correct myself and line up behind Dave and Melissa: definitely less than 24 hours. I flipped through the last couple of months and this is the best day that I could dig up:
I demo'ed the Minimed and Dexcom before choosing the Navigator. In talking to people on TuD, I'd say that everyone who switches to Dex or Nav from MM has a better experience. I found the MM to be an evil harpoon. It was so inaccurate and painful (in my back right hip) that I left a tear-soaked voicemail on my CDE's phone, telling her there was no way I'd consider CGM. Then a few months later, I agreed to try the Dex for 7...
Show me a diabetic that can keep their bg's between 70 and 130 24/7 for 2 weeks and I'll submit they aren't a T1. They've got some other variation of the disease. My wife's diabetes is NOTHING like mine and she is what one would unofficially classify as a 1.5. Anytime she goes high, without taking a correction, she comes right back down. I'm a typical T1 and have to work hard to get 12 straight hours of bg's...
Thanks for the info. I think it's time I contact my endo and CDE and ask about doing a trial run with the Nav and Dex. I agree with your comments about the MM...my biggest gripe was the huge inaccuracy. I knew going into it that the numbers would never match my meter, but I expected it to be close!! Otherwise, what's the point? I'm a teacher, too!!!
Thanks Danny... I do find this forum motivating as well. I have been striving for control for many many years, but I keep getting better--with the semi occasional hiccup (ya...once or twice a day ;)
24 hours for this LADA. Depressing question..lol. If you changed it to 70-140 I would have several two day runs. I agree with Kelly it's pretty irrelevant what nondiabetics have! It's how often we meet our own target goals!
[Alex] 3 days since his last shot and holding normal... [Alex] 3 days since his last shot and holding normal glucose levels. We'll test again in a month, but he's currently off insulin. Sweet!!
4:35 PM Aug 27th
from Ping.fm
Thread profile page for "Maintaining Normal Glucose Levels" on http://tudiabetes.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Maintaining Normal Glucose Levels", located on the Message Board at http://tudiabetes.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity