Thread: M16 or M110

The .338 Lup. even with a muzzle brake kicks like a mule. Yep, the 7mag, with full jackets really penetrates. I have a bunch of pulled that are armor piercing, and they are awesome in what they will penetrate. Shot completely through a old engine block, steel not aluminum.

Quote: Originally Posted by Sgt. Cav ps: my favorite sniping loading is the 7 x 63.5mm, I have access to pulled 7mm FMJ's and can pick and choose what I want, I weigh them out and select only bullets with the exact same weights, 175grs. I have a pet load that puts them out my 24in. barrel at 3000fps and do they eat up body armor, and it shoots well out past 1000. I like it because it's recoil isn't that much more than the...

Quote: Originally Posted by Sgt. Cav Cuzz why? that is some dangerous information to post across a open board. i taught the same way..but if u look for 5.56 bullet trajctory and many more bullet u can find it on webs easily then i taught the same with the 7.62

Quote: Originally Posted by Roei Hazan ye back then it was different m16, if u will need any information about the new m16 i know anything, fell free. 7.62 is sucks {but sniping} So what is your argument against 7.62 NATO?

Quote: Originally Posted by Roei Hazan do you think m110 might be better then m16 for marksman?any idea? M110 is better for shooting from long distances, but M16A2E3 is better to move with alongside general infantry. Personally I think Kel-Tec RFB is very promising.

Loved it when the bad guys kept it at spray and pray, made my job easier.

Sgt Cav. Recommend reading Trigger Men by Hans Halberstadt. It contains more than a few battlefield accounts of the M4/M16A4 DMRs utilizing the ACOG telescopic sight and the 77-grain bullet (with many accounts of the latter's far superior performance to the standard 62-grain bullet).

In places like Afghanistan where heavier calibres than the 5.65 seem to provide a more lethal outcome, would the current stock piles of 7.62 rifles in Western countries involved be enough to replace the currently issued 5.56. A horses for courses solution, plus the advantage of a standard round for all the squad weapons, i.e. , rifles, machine guns and sniper rifles. You would get an increase in range and hitting power, the only downside would...

I'm not an expert but from what I know of the M16\M4 is that the barrel of the M4 is reinforced while the M16 is not (at least the ones I use) and because the M4's barrel is reinforced it can shoot armor piercing bullets while the M16 cant, which could mean that It can kill at longer ranges (I'm just guessing). I use the M16A1 so I don’t know if the newer versions have reinforced barrels.

Quote: Originally Posted by GB_FXST To be fair to non-Hebrew speakers here, you should not do that . all the staff have said on a number of times to please use English only Roei Hazan your post in Hebrew has been deleted