Iran concealed the building of a second uranium enrichment plant in defiance of calls for transparency over its nuclear plans, US President Barack Obama says.
The leaders of the US, UK and France demanded UN inspectors be given immediate access to the facility.
Iran revealed the existence of the plant to the UN watchdog on Monday, saying it was not yet operational and would only be ...
Melody All American Gal replied 2 months, 3 weeks ago
Wow what a surprise, gee it seems that having 'no pre-conditions' is working out really well for us!
That is very comforting to know that that facility is only going to be used for making nuclear energy! Yes, and BTW Hitler wanted all of us to know all those ovens built in those camps were only for baking bread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoliticallyPlump
Iran concealed the building of a second uranium enrichment plant in defiance of calls for transparency over its nuclear plans, US President Barack Obama says.
The leaders of the US, UK and France demanded UN inspectors be given immediate access to the facility.
Iran revealed...
Quote:
There are now two threads running on this story .. I posted the other one a little while ago myself, in the 'International' section, after having seen a live broadcast of Obama, Sarkozy and Brown all saying that the status quo just would not stand.
Just noticed that myself a little bit ago.
Quote:
...
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoliticallyPlump
Just noticed that myself a little bit ago.
I am merely stating that it looks awfully familiar to me right now, the whole, demanding inspections and allegations about Uranium enrichment for a bomb thing. In fact it kind of reminds me of the allegations leading up to the war in Iraq. I ...
Iran did not reveal this nuclear facility. the IAEA did. it was informed on monday and then accounced it yesterday.
the IAEA requires 6 months notice before a facility becomes operational and apparently this plant in iran will not be operational for a much longer time than that.
also, it seems the organization has also said that this site cannot enrich uranium to a degree necessary to ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by markstob
Iran did not reveal this nuclear facility. the IAEA did. it was informed on monday and then accounced it yesterday.
the IAEA requires 6 months notice before a facility becomes operational and apparently this plant in iran will not be operational for a much longer time than that.
also, it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoliticallyPlump
I am merely stating that it looks awfully familiar to me right now, the whole, demanding inspections and allegations about Uranium enrichment for a bomb thing. In fact it kind of reminds me of the allegations leading up to the war in Iraq. I just was asserting that there should be no talk...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drummond
When did Israel EVER threaten to wipe Iran off the map ??
And Israel, unlike Iran (although the latter is obviously working to change this), does have the capability to carry out this threat. Yet they don't. Amazing thing, that self control; works for us, too, when not ...
Quote:
For starters, what if this DOES look familiar ? The Iraq War was highly necessary to finally deal with the outstanding WMD issue, which UN involvement previously had done so very little to MEANINGFULLY deal with. The UN inspection team had no way of achieving anything worthwhile without full and honest cooperation from Saddam's regime. This they did NOT get ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoliticallyPlump
1. Quick fact for you. Iran has never aggressed in any modern war against its neighbors. NEVER.
2. Israel has no proof that they are building weapons grade Uranium. Until they do, accusing Iran of building a bomb, or secretly wanting to build one is simply conjecture. To top it ...
Quote: Originally Posted by Arion45 You and I differ on what we consider threats to this country but i am obligated to pay for it if I agree or not. Is this liberty? Im amused by this, Arion45. Do I understand from this that you consider yourself an expert on security matters ? Yes or no ? If no .. then … could it be that your money finds its way to those who ARE more expert than you ? And could it therefore be that if you and...
Quote: Originally Posted by RET423 No, I support citizens demanding that their government provide a defense sufficient to deal with all enemies foreign and domestic. I also support requiring the citizens to pay for that defense. It is not "coercive", the duly elected Congress & the duly elected President set tax law. We The People choose every one of them so We The People are to blame if those Representatives suck....
Quote: Originally Posted by Arion45 What you are describing is not liberty. It is tyranny and slavery. The government takes my income by threat of gun and prison. (this is the very definition of coercion) If I object to the wars this country conducts I can not withhold my income and give it someone who will provide a defense that better fits my views. YOU ARE THE GOVERNMENT! So am I, it is not tyranny or coercion if we FREELY CHOOSE OUR...
Quote: Originally Posted by markstob ret thats nonsense. liberty does not have to involved bloodshed. Bulls---. It takes bloodshed to get it, and in the long term, it takes bloodshed to keep it. Quote: Originally Posted by Blackwell Liberty without bloodshed = rolling over and letting the enemy walk right in. Quote: Originally Posted by Susanna Liberty has always been won with bloodshed.
I simply do not have time right now to respond, i will post my responses later. However i did see something on the news today about Iran threatening to recant the Non Proliferation Treaty if we push the Nuclear issue. If that is the case then we need to act, however if they respond to the talks tommorow and provide unfettered access to their facilities that will be a step in the right direction. Only time will tell. Susanna, I am not the...
Oh and here is another link you also will not go and look at...here is a map of th range of Iran's missiles.... MAP The range of Irans missiles-Aljazeera Snow Report Blog
Yeah, there's no credible evidence of nuclear weapons. Just recent test launches. Enrichment sites. Threats to those who want to stop them. All the pieces are there, and he's trying to put them together. He's even offered to buy enriched uranium, he wants it so bad.
New post, "UN nuclear agency: Iran’s... New post, "UN nuclear agency: Iran’s once-secret nuclear facility to start enriching uranium in 2011" - http://bit.ly/3qLiZ2
Thread profile page for "Iran 'concealed nuclear facility'" on http://www.republicanoperative.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Iran 'concealed nuclear facility'", located on the Message Board at http://www.republicanoperative.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity