Quote:
Let a modern hypothetical case illustrate the point. Suppose Michael Moore writes a secret biography of George Washington and attributes it to Benedict Arnold. (Moore is able to maintain his anonymity somehow.) A few copies get into circulation but are widely dismissed by scholars as forgeries and not worthy of any serious consideration. The book is a flop; few copies ever get circulated...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nineveh
allsmiles,
It's really too bad you have no better arguments.
gimme a break Nineveh.
Quote:
Most Christians would lose nothing by remaining ignorant of such things and focusing, instead, on the real Scriptures. Light is more satisfying than darkness.
ignorance is bliss. i don't have to have an argument, this damns itself.
Really illustrated how desparate people are to discredit the resurrection
and the salvation message. The blinders and earplugs people stuff
themselves with so they don't have to face the truth are truely amazing.
Very well illustrated point Nineveh.
yeah, it's amazing the points you can illustrate when you make up
hypotheticals and then compare your presuppositions to them to discredit
possible theological implications.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nineveh
allsmiles,
If you can't rebut the argument, help yourself to one of the spam threads.
Nineveh, please. this is typical, knee-jerk christian hysteria.
the Gospel of Judas is an artifact, it is an antiquity that deserves
attention. if you're so right and the GoJ is so wrong then you should have
no problem looking it square in the eyes, examing it and ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by allsmiles
Nineveh, please. this is typical, knee-jerk christian hysteria.
the Gospel of Judas is an artifact, it is an antiquity that deserves attention. if you're so right and the GoJ is so wrong then you should have no problem looking it square in the eyes, examing it and remaining confident in your faith.
that the recommended response to the GoJ is to ignore it ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nineveh
It's really ancient, that's a fact. But it's not really accurate compared to history, and "ancient" doesn't make it anything more than ... old.
no, it's not accurate compared to the bible, there's a difference. and as
for something being ancient not being anything more than old, you might
want to try wrapping your brain around the idea that the very same ...
Quote: Originally Posted by NuGnostic you could get the correct ones as quoted by me and decided upon by indepenant scholars. Your dates: "Thomas as old as AD 200 matthew,mark and luke were in use by about 100ad,John perhaps as late as 120ad." I didn't disagree You have at least 80 years worth of gap there. Looking at those dates, the oldest Thomas is no earlier than 200 A.D.. The newest John is no later than 120 A.D. Until...
Quote: Originally Posted by NuGnostic But your scholars were of very dubious positions,why don't I just go ask the pope. You just went waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay way waaaaaaaay out in left field there.... I am talking about the early Church, you know folks that belonged to Chruches started by Paul and the like? Quote: scrapping the barrell are we?face it you lost. What's this? The 5th time you've declared victory? : laughing :...
Quote: Originally Posted by Nineveh Well, if you presuppose people 300 years removed have more info than eye witness accounts, then yeah, we can't have a rational discussion about it. well no... i presuppose that Jesus himself is a myth, so no gospel has any more authority than another.
Quote: I am sure your scholars agree on this point too, just as mine do not. But your scholars were of very dubious positions,why don't I just go ask the pope. Quote: Ok, then, don't say it scrapping the barrell are we?face it you lost.
Quote: Originally Posted by Nineveh And please stop spamming the thread Thanks in advance If you don't like my style I'll just leave your lame thread to it's lameness and brighten another with my presence.
Quote: Originally Posted by Nineveh noguru, I've found a link for you concerning the canon Thank you Nineveh, I appreciate your effort. I am posting a portion of the text which I find to be the main point of this whole debate. Quote: The Authority Relationship Between Church and Canon Incorrect Vew Church determines canon Church is the mother of canon Church is the magistrate of canon Church is the regulator of canon Church is the judge...
Quote: Originally Posted by NuGnostic Who's saying they're athiests, they could be christian,they just rely on archaelogical evidence.That's a very biased attitude. You expect me to believe that people who try to discredit Christianity are Christians? I might have been born at night, but it wasn't last night. Quote: But you rely on catholic scholars,and councils. No, I don't. Quote: Yes you do No, I don't. Quote:...
Quote: Originally Posted by Nineveh noguru, I am not finding any information that implies Judas was included with the Dead Sea Scrolls. What I have found is this however, it's dated to around 300 AD, although Irenaeus denounced it even earlier in 180 AD. cite Yes, thanks. Here is a quote I found. Quote: The problem was the 'bad provenance', its obscure origin. Tchakos and Roberty told Ferrini that farmers discovered the books in...
Topper: An Interesting Take on a Search Engine:... Topper: An Interesting Take on a Search Engine:
Topper: An Interesting Take on a Search Engine Fetc.. http://tinyurl.com/34xdsb 7:05 PM Feb 15th, 2008 from twitterfeed
RT @ UVaDeanJ : Didn't realize holistic admission... RT @ UVaDeanJ : Didn't realize holistic admission processes were "elitist." Interesting take on SuperApp--Your take on elitist is interesting.
10:20 AM Oct 2nd
from web
@ MarilynMeberg & I have had the most interesting... @ MarilynMeberg & I have had the most interesting exchange n texts, abt death being the enemy..but God giving victory thru Christ. Great NEWS
3:31 PM Aug 24th
from web
Thread profile page for "Interesting Take On Gnostic Texts" on http://www.theologyonline.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Interesting Take On Gnostic Texts", located on the Message Board at http://www.theologyonline.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity