Does anyone know what size exhaust is ideal for the GC? I know Kristn's custom was 3in,as are many aftermarket ones. But is this the best choice?
If i get a custom exhaust made, what size piping should be used, and what RPM range should be targeted when making considerations for this?
I also wouldn't be surprised if they are actually different for the 2.0T and the 3.8, and maybe even dif for...
Note: Posted this last night, but the Mods saw fit to delete it for some
reason; this topic started in the backpressure myth thread, but I have
moved it out for more visibility and because it wasn't really on that topic
anymore.
def a hard call... the 'loss of torque' is probably low end of the RPM range. w/ 3" piping, there is more volume in the pipes to fill. i forget all the technical jargon but this can hurt a bit and would explain the low end loss. it would help though on the high end.
on turbo'd cars, 2.5" will usually suffice up to low 300hp range, maybe w/ a 3" cat and downpipe. 3" does have a marginal ...
^^ jc, 2.5" is actually better for well more than 300 horses. Exhaust sizing with turbocharged cars depends on the size of the turbo (output), and the flow rate of the motor (this particular property applies to N/A). Keep in mind that certain formulas help with torque, others help with top end. It's all in what you're designing your car to do. Also, I think the technical term that you were ...
No, I am saying that having a 2.5" exhaust system is plenty for most people. Don't fall for the propaganda out there. Remember, the companies that endorse a 3" exhaust system want your money. With your goals in mind, go with a 2.5". You will save money!
Going from smaller to larger would cause the flow to slow down at the end of the exhaust system compared to the header. By narrowing the exhaust it would increase velocity. I suspect that if you are wanting to design some noise into it you could use these to accomplish it. I would expect the higher velocity to produce a higher pitch and the lower velocity to produce a lower pitch.
This ...
So I also noticed that "According to AMS' measurements, the factory exhaust has a 2.375-inch (60mm) outer diameter and is crushed down to 1.75-inch for about 8 inches in length to clear an underbody brace." While HKS has released a 60mm (2.36220472 in) cat-back. Why would they make it narrower than stock?
Going from smaller to larger would cause the flow to slow down at the end of the exhaust system compared to the header. By narrowing the exhaust it would increase velocity. I suspect that if you are wanting to design some noise into it you could use these to accomplish it. I would expect the higher velocity to produce a higher pitch and the lower velocity to produce a lower pitch. This is all just supposition, I have nothing to back it up... I...
Like what my mods guys tell me, if I want to put a turbo on this car, you need to thinking this before you doing this modification, the diameter will change and he think a dual 3" will be great and the cat will be changed too for more performance one! Without this modification, I agree with you, just by double it the original exhaust pipe will add better result. On the canadian model, we have two cat but only one muffler!
Thats weird ^ on my s13 when I went back to stock (2.25) from 3 inch, I attained boost at a lower RPM than with the 3 inch doesnt that mean that you would spool faster with smaller diameter piping and have a higher peak boost with the bigger diameter piping????. For moderately modified turbo cars I always thought bigger was better, 3 inch was Ideal, IMO it all comes down to exhaust design.
Thread profile page for "Ideal Exhaust Diameter for the GC" on http://www.gencoupe.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Ideal Exhaust Diameter for the GC", located on the Message Board at http://www.gencoupe.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity