Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: House Health Care bill, a summary

Started 4 weeks, 1 day ago by reb
No "death panels" I can see, thank god repubicans were not involved. *** PART 1 The Affordable Health Care for America Act [H.R. 3962], which blends and updates the three versions of previous bills passed by the House committees of jurisdiction. (You know, the ones the wingers were trying to pawn off as the REAL deal all summer) Insurance reforms. - ...
Site: This Board Rocks  This Board Rocks - site profile
Forum: Politics  Politics - forum profile
Total authors: 11 authors
Total thread posts: 25 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: thisboardrocks.com

Other posts in this thread:

reb replied 4 weeks, 1 day ago
Part 2 Improved access to vaccines. - Makes it easier for Medicare beneficiaries to get access to needed vaccinations by covering all vaccines under Part B of the program rather than Part D. Extend Qualified Individuals (QI) program. - Extends the QI program two years to help low-income beneficiaries pay their Part B premiums. Extends months of coverage of immunosuppressive ...

Section B replied 4 weeks, 1 day ago
H.R. 3962 provides that an individual (or a husband and wife in the case of a joint return) who does not, at any time during the taxable year, maintain acceptable health insurance coverage for himself or herself and each of his or her qualifying children is subject to an additional tax.” [page 1] - - - - - - - - - - “If the government determines that the taxpayer’s unpaid tax liability...

Section B replied 4 weeks, 1 day ago
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...-the-bribe- was ObamaCare endorsements: What the bribe was By Dick Morris - 11/06/09 11:22 AM ET By Dick Morris and Eileen McGann As the suicidal Democratic congressmen proceed to rubber-stamp the Obama healthcare reform despite the drubbing their party took in the ’09 elections, the president trotted out the endorsements of the AMA and the ...

jazzbluescat replied 4 weeks, 1 day ago
That 'no preexisting conditions' is going to effect premiums like you wouldn't believe. I wonder if Medicare will start covering 100% instead of 80%? If so, it'll sting private carriers.

Little Guy replied 4 weeks, 1 day ago

TheGame08 replied 4 weeks, 1 day ago
Quote: Originally Posted by Little Guy good luck. Pelosi and the House leadership played it perfectly. Dennis Kucinich was the only person who voted against the bill that pisses me off. There were around ten or so who were in favor of the bill, but voted against it for political cover. Good luck hammering ...

chipshot replied 4 weeks, 1 day ago
Quote: Originally Posted by jazzbluescat That 'no preexisting conditions' is going to effect premiums like you wouldn't believe. . Yep

T_Schroll replied 4 weeks ago
Reb thinks he isn't going to be taxed and some one else will foot his bill. Problem is, the CBO scoring didn't include the staffing for the 100+ new beuracracies this bill creates nor the salaries to pay the new government employees. Guess who'll be bitching when it comes time to pay his part for this fiasco?

reb replied 4 weeks ago
Quote: Originally Posted by T_Schroll Reb thinks he isn't going to be taxed and some one else will foot his bill. Problem is, the CBO scoring didn't include the staffing for the 100+ new beuracracies this bill creates nor the salaries to pay the new government employees. Guess who'll be bitching when it comes time to pay his part for ...

WilliamJ replied 4 weeks ago
Quote: Originally Posted by reb I'll be paying less than I would be listening to wingers. I know that going in. Health Care Reform confronts the "cost" of Health Care for the American People and the point of the exercise is to make the cost of Health Care cheaper. It will be cheaper than if repubicans had their way. We have already ...

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
reb
7
user's latest post:
House Health Care bill, a summary
Published (2009-11-09 18:04:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by WilliamJ i'm still waiting for the government to address the actual costs of healthcare. please tell me why that is embarassing? This Congress could address Anything all day long and it would not be good enough for you because wingers are not in power. The subject makes no difference. You are just like the rest of them dealing in misdirection and FEAR.
WilliamJ
3
user's latest post:
House Health Care bill, a summary
Published (2009-11-09 18:36:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by reb This Congress could address Anything all day long and it would not be good enough for you because wingers are not in power. The subject makes no difference. You are just like the rest of them dealing in misdirection and FEAR. what misdirection did i deal?
T_Schroll
3
user's latest post:
House Health Care bill, a summary
Published (2009-11-10 12:17:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by gottalaff That's all you got? that's all he ever has. He's gone through life thinking every one owes him and now he's got an administration and congress willing to let him think he's right about it while raping the treasury along with this and future generations of taxpayers to buy him off.
gottalaff
3
user's latest post:
House Health Care bill, a...
Published (2009-11-10 15:28:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by gridfaniker owned
Section B
2
user's latest post:
House Health Care bill, a summary
Published (2009-11-08 15:37:00)
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...-the-bribe-was ObamaCare endorsements: What the bribe was By Dick Morris - 11/06/09 11:22 AM ET By Dick Morris and Eileen McGann As the suicidal Democratic congressmen proceed to rubber-stamp the Obama healthcare reform despite the drubbing their party took in the ’09 elections, the president trotted out the endorsements of the AMA and the AARP to stimulate support. But these — and...
gridfaniker
2
user's latest post:
House Health Care bill, a...
Published (2009-11-10 13:57:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by tonync55 Why. We couldn't believe them if they did. The Republicans told us the cost of the Medicare part D prescription drug bill would be no more than 800 million. That has since been revised to about 3 trillion. why hasn't Osama fixed the Medicare D debacle? hope and change in all seriousness, can you please post a link that shows the Medicare Part D prescription bill is costing the country $3 trillion.
TheGame08
1
user's latest post:
House Health Care bill, a summary
Published (2009-11-08 15:50:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Little Guy good luck. Pelosi and the House leadership played it perfectly. Dennis Kucinich was the only person who voted against the bill that pisses me off. There were around ten or so who were in favor of the bill, but voted against it for political cover. Good luck hammering them on it.
chipshot
1
user's latest post:
House Health Care bill, a summary
Published (2009-11-08 15:58:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by jazzbluescat That 'no preexisting conditions' is going to effect premiums like you wouldn't believe. . Yep
jazzbluescat
1
user's latest post:
House Health Care bill, a summary
Published (2009-11-08 15:40:00)
That 'no preexisting conditions' is going to effect premiums like you wouldn't believe. I wonder if Medicare will start covering 100% instead of 80%? If so, it'll sting private carriers.
Little Guy
1
user's latest post:
House Health Care bill, a summary
Published (2009-11-08 15:40:00)

Related threads on "This Board Rocks":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "House Health Care bill, a summary" on http://www.thisboardrocks.com. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "House Health Care bill, a summary", located on the Message Board at http://www.thisboardrocks.com. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity