Thread: GG: KZ3 needs to run at 60 fps!! - Killzone 2 (PS3) - PlayStation.com Forums

BnPBitsnPieces wrote: I personally think KZ2 looks better also.   Sure, U2 has that hotel part where you just see breathtaking view of the city, but look out further and you start to see the imperfections of the game. Not as bad as U1, but it's there. Take a view of KZ2, you see perfection; things are smooth and detailed.   However, walk up close to some objects and places, U2 may just have a slight edge over KZ2. Slight edge only...

kevny1 wrote: wow did that dumbass just put uc2 over kz2 for graphics LMAO. there is no comparrision its a fking 3rd person shooter lol compare it with warhawk mayb since when did the genre of a game determine whether it looks better than another?  

wow did that dumbass just put uc2 over kz2 for graphics LMAO. there is no comparrision its a fking 3rd person shooter lol compare it with warhawk mayb  

raptor210232 wrote: anidais wrote: raptor210232 wrote: kevny1 wrote: wow did that dumbass just put uc2 over kz2 for graphics LMAO. there is no comparrision its a fking 3rd person shooter lol compare it with warhawk mayb   Just because a game is 3rd person does not mean its worse. Nearly everything about Uncharted 2 is better then KIllzone 2.  Also there is a reason why I left the kilzone 2 board and its because people like you are KZ2...

I personally think KZ2 looks better also.   Sure, U2 has that hotel part where you just see breathtaking view of the city, but look out further and you start to see the imperfections of the game. Not as bad as U1, but it's there. Take a view of KZ2, you see perfection; things are smooth and detailed.   However, walk up close to some objects and places, U2 may just have a slight edge over KZ2. Slight edge only because U2 does lose some...

I don't know, when you think about the stuff Uncharted 2 does and the stuff KZ2 does, I find them very close.  

I thought this was the only thorn in KZ2's side.  Imagine those amazing visuals at 60fps!!  Modern Warfare 2 has sub-par visuals but 60 FPS makes the visuals and the game  SO MUCH BETTER.

kevny1 wrote: LMAO what do these forums say killzone 2 or mw2 FFS. mw2 fanboys quit spamming about how much you love mw2 and how you quit killzone we honestly dont give a flying **bleep** so go to your little cod forums guys, i found the new guy  

Normally people cannot determine the difference between 60 fps, and 30 fps.   So it doesn't really affect the game, besides, MW2 has no where near the level of visuals that Killzone 2 has, so I'd rather have 30 fps with great visuals, then 60 fps with so so visuals.  

With all the gfx quality in kz2 you can not run this game at 60 fps on the ps3. The ps3 is powerful but not that powerful. You cant have it all. You either want great visuals or you want super fast gameplay with crap visuals.. Personally I love kz2 just how it is!