Thread: Filing Fees

Quote: Originally Posted by Bengal B It may be more clearly to you but not to the rest of us non juris doctors I'm not a juris doctor. I'm convinced that the People have been hoodwinked by the Brotherhood for at least ninety years. Not only do lawyers know nothing that ordinary literate citizens are incapable of knowing, they enjoy no lawful advantage over other citizens. It's time for Americans to learn enough to show the...

Quote: Originally Posted by red55 It should, as long as judges are overseen by review boards and subject to appeals court rulings. But I'd like to see judges elected to long terms so they aren't having to politic very much or very often. Poor, uninformed, naive Red. You clearly have not spent any significant time in our legal system.

Quote: Originally Posted by SabanFan Poor, uninformed, naive Red. Oooh! Strike one, two, three in one sentence. Yer out! Quote: Originally Posted by SabanFan You clearly have not spent any significant time in our legal system. I'm sure the statute of limitations has passed, but best I not comment . . .

again, nobody cares about this definition nonsense. they care about specifics of why something is allowed or not. when i get handcuffed for pot possession, i dont say to the judge "this is unlegal deplomination of my jurisdephlooper rights!". i just take my punishment, then later try to convince everyone that the legalization of drugs is a benefit to society. that is what they care about, not the ramblings of crazyness.

Quote: Originally Posted by tinsley Answers.com The term lawful more clearly suggests an ethical content than does the word legal. rds are used as exact equivalents. It may be more clearly to you but not to the rest of us non juris doctors

Quote: Originally Posted by SabanFan That makes too much sense. Lawyers will always turn on the crocodile tears and whine that it would deny access to the poor. I think civil courts should have panels of ordinary citizens who would have to approve a claims legitimacy before a suit could be filed. Maybe ordinary citizens w/ a smattering of an education? Quote: Originally Posted by red55 Not for losing, only for losing frivolously . I'd...

Quote: Originally Posted by red55 Apparently you do not either. The words are synonymous. legal    –adjective 1. permitted by law; lawful . 2. of or pertaining to law. 3. appointed, established, or authorized by law. 4. recognized by law rather than by equity. lawful    –adjective 1. allowed or permitted by law. 2. recognized or sanctioned by law. 3. appointed or recognized by law. 4. legal ly...

Quote: Originally Posted by SabanFan Are you suggesting that the taxpayers fund court costs? I think he's suggesting an uprising. And I'm not even trying to be funny here. A ton of his posts seem to point toward wanting a revolution. This has gotten out of hand. The court fees are just that. Court fees. The courts employees need to get paid and that's where most of this comes to play. Are you a lawyer, tinsely? If so, what...

so what kind of bets are we placing on exactly what kind of court case did the tin-man lose that now he hates all attorneys? aka "the brotherhood". divorce and royally screwed? possession?