Thread: Democratic consultant says he got a warning from White House afterappearing on Fox News
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago by The Engine
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la- na-obama-fox8-2009nov08,0,507227.story?test=latest news
Reporting from Washington - At least one Democratic political strategist has gotten a blunt warning from the White House to never appear on Fox News Channel, an outlet that presidential aides have depicted as not so much a news-gathering operation as a political opponent bent on ...
The Engine wrote: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la- na-obama-fox8-2009nov08,0,507227.story?test=latest news
Reporting from Washington - At least one Democratic political strategist has gotten a blunt warning from the White House to never appear on Fox News Channel, an outlet that presidential aides have depicted as not so much a news-gathering operation as a political ...
Tyr-Ziu Saxnot wrote: YOU CAN TAKE THE BOY OUT OF CHICAGO BUT YOU CAN NOT TAKE CHICAGO OUT OF THE BOY! THUG AND LYING SCUM DONT WASH OFF SO EASILY.-TZS
So True!
rebelwthcz wrote: Tyr-Ziu Saxnot wrote: YOU CAN TAKE THE BOY OUT OF CHICAGO BUT YOU CAN NOT TAKE CHICAGO OUT OF THE BOY! THUG AND LYING SCUM DONT WASH OFF SO EASILY.-TZS
So True!
--So well known by many and growing daily too rebelwthcz ..
IF this story is true...since no source has been identified. Is anyone surprised at hearing such a story?
I'll wait for the actual, documented information...with a Name attached, before making any further remarks.
After all. Since I have been identified on this forum as a known LIAR. There's no sense in going against my principles now...of letting my guard down...and appearing ...
If it is true, good for them. It is about time someone stood up to the Rightie stooges.
One of the great things about this country is I can choose which ever contractor and vendor I want. If I don't like their customer service or the way they dress, I can pick a different contractor.
All the White House is saying is do not come looking for business here if you continue to support our ...
Oldsalt wrote: IF this story is true...since no source has been identified. Is anyone surprised at hearing such a story?
I'll wait for the actual, documented information...with a Name attached, before making any further remarks.
After all. Since I have been identified on this forum as a known LIAR. There's no sense in going against my principles now...of letting my guard down...
If true, the white can not continue to threaten private citizens much longer and expect to remain in power. The chips are stacking up. Rhetoric will not remove them from the table.........
lightoftruth wrote: If true, the white can not continue to threaten private citizens much longer and expect to remain in power. The chips are stacking up. Rhetoric will not remove them from the table.........
LoT. Even if this story proves to be false. I do get the feeling I'm watching a White House, a Pretend President, and a Majority in Congress go through the gory details of...
Obama is a child. If he were politically savvy he would use the most watched cable news channel to sell his agenda. He is behaving like Nixon. What's next? A beak-in at Fox headquarters?
He's an embarrassment to democracy.
UnamusedMother wrote: BuckFan wrote No, I mean any US citizen that that particular unit of the Federal government decides may be involved in terrorism of any kind. There is no need for higher review by the administration or the judicial branch. Some squad leader can pick you up as a terrorist suspect and hold you indefinitely without contact to the outside world. You do not get your one phone call, you do not get...
The Engine wrote: BuckFan wrote: The Engine wrote: s13 wrote: The Engine wrote: s13 wrote: The Engine wrote: It's probably true and its consistent with Obama's Modus Operandai-he recently requested an anti-Obama web site to provide a list of everyone who had visited the site; Please help me understand something the engine. Paraphrasing a real source is "Heresay" but quoting one anonymous "Democratic political...
s13 wrote: What U.S President supported the unpatriot act? And what dem4life said was appsolutely true It's true, my friend. Dem4life wouldn't lie...
UnamusedMother wrote: BuckFan wrote No, I mean any US citizen that that particular unit of the Federal government decides may be involved in terrorism of any kind. There is no need for higher review by the administration or the judicial branch. Some squad leader can pick you up as a terrorist suspect and hold you indefinitely without contact to the outside world. You do not get your one phone call, you do not get...
BuckFan wrote: oleman wrote: Problem is there is a difference in commentary and news programming. You confuse the two. I find very little news programming on Fox. Everyone of their hosts inserts commentary in their news reporting. Even when they are "reading the news" they end up tainting it with comments. Interesting....do you have a remote? Use it....maybe MSNBC might be more to your views.
The Engine wrote: robertr2000 wrote: dem4life wrote: I wonder if faux news has ever put a "D" behind a republican name who might have been in trouble... I'm sure it was a simple mistake You guys dont think the liberal media screws up? Or intentionally spins information? Whenever a Democrat is caught in a scandal, you don't even see a D by their name...it just says their name. That's how you can always tell when...
Oldsalt wrote: noetsi wrote: This has nothing to do with free speach or government. The democratic party is not government, and people working for an organization dont have speach rights if they want to stay employed. Ask the courts about that. If he wants to assist FOX he can. He just has to give up his gig with the democrats. Which FOX does its best to harm. noetsi. As the professed highly intelligent, highly educated wannabe you'd...
noetsi wrote: This has nothing to do with free speach or government. The democratic party is not government, and people working for an organization dont have speach rights if they want to stay employed. Ask the courts about that. If he wants to assist FOX he can. He just has to give up his gig with the democrats. Which FOX does its best to harm. It just seems like Fox "harms" the democrat party because when their policies are held...
noetsi wrote: This has nothing to do with free speach or government. The democratic party is not government, and people working for an organization dont have speach rights if they want to stay employed. Ask the courts about that. If he wants to assist FOX he can. He just has to give up his gig with the democrats. Which FOX does its best to harm. noetsi. As the professed highly intelligent, highly educated wannabe you'd like us all to...
YAHOO! NEWS - Top Democratic consultant on FBI... YAHOO! NEWS - Top Democratic consultant on FBI Blagojevich tapes
(AP)
: AP - A partner in a promi.. http://tinyurl.com/cvwcr6 6:18 PM Jan 22nd from twitterfeed
Thread profile page for "Democratic consultant says he got a warning from White House afterappearing on Fox News" on http://www.perspectives.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Democratic consultant says he got a warning from White House afterappearing on Fox News", located on the Message Board at http://www.perspectives.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity