Thread: D3 and my girlfriend

Because your eyes can and until the camera can do the same thing, no one will be happy. YOU can see movement in the dark, your camera CAN'T!

asasan wrote: > ...Nikkor, 300f2.8, get revised but the rest, NOOO. OMG... lok at this. This is insane. http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/af/telephoto/af-s_300mmf_28g_ed_vr2/img/pic_002.jpg

Hi Glenn very different, but I like it! I need to get me one of these, I'm fed up panning racing cars on my D3 at f11!!! Great post as usual, thanks for the supplementary info, very helpful Cheers Tony www.wildoat.zenfolio.com

I have come a cross this before. I did take a photo of them doing their shoot, but I certainly would not walk up next to the photographer and take shots of his or her model! But in this case, the photographer wanted to talk and I did take one shot of the bride and emailed it to the photographer.

em_dee_aitch wrote: > Well, I think I have that figured out: Because they know their future road map, and we don't, I think they needed to design the ultimate "pixel peeper's" lens to future proof it against D4x and D5x, because the lens cycle is normally overlaps 2 to 3 pro body cycles. The know that even with the annoying angle of view difference that I pointed out above that this lens will be a good compromise...

Maybe they put an extra thick layer of coating on it? :-) Ive only had a brief introduction with the Nikkor 400mm f/2.8D AF-I ED-IF, which has it not. although the 'old' 300mm f/2.8 VR-I was there during the introduction day, I did not notice it. Michel Bernard Languillier wrote: > > M Lammerse wrote: > > The teleconverter has an aspherical lens element > > The new 300mm f/2.8 has been...

This may be far too deep for me and probably best answered by those photographers who truly excell as artist in the portrait and landscape arena's where perhaps deadlines and business parameters are not the driving forces. But I'm going to take a stab at it anyway and say that it is really both. Yes and no. BTW, too funny Hans. But I can recall that I have done this too when having the thoughts collect as a jumble in your head and...

In ACR, when opening a new raw file, use AS SHOT but use AUTO as opposed to DEFAULT. You see, AS SHOT in DEFAULT pretty much delivers too much BRIGHTNESS. Try this. It takes 1 second and will probably benefit 95% of your shots. I think this is all part of Nikon not giving Adobe the info they need to properly tweak AS SHOT. Anyway, give it a try.

While you are excited about something you think is the future others are working on your real future.

PatrickP wrote: > > Hopefully it will bring us a D800, 18MP with clean ISO6400 (as in D3/D700), 1080 (24p, 30p) video with good enough autofocus for $3499.... > > I wouldn't mind a D3S quality D700S with 720p video for $2999 as well. > > The earlier the D800/D700S come out and the cheaper it will become by next summer... A few things... The D3s has just started shipping. The D700 was announced...