Thread: Critique of soldiers - http://www.drugbuyers.com/freeboard
Started 1 month, 1 week ago by cg0000
Why is it that within the Western World, soldiers are automatically labeled "heroes" and "heroic". I don't understand this position, after all, they are doing a job; which entails accepting authority. Clearly, they often don't have the moral capability (or choose to ignore it) to make their own decisions and decide to abstain from something which is clearly detrimental to others. To be ...
If we didn't have people willing to be in the military, you wouldn't have people from the US being able to post to you. We would LOVE to have war where people aren't killed, but greater minds than yours have not come up with a way to do that. Murder? That's different than war. This post of yours speaking against the people that do this job isn't worth the "paper is it written on" it is ...
You are totally ignoring the point. I clearly said that it is important that a state has an army, as everyone already has one. No, murder is murder. Intentionally killing somebody is murder, although, there are mitigating factors (Self-defence etc) And NO thanks to the State and it's ARMY, eventually/potentially you WONT have the ability to say anything on these drug forums, nor criticise...
The military does not practice Democracy, they defend it. You only have the right to spout the garbage you just spouted because soldiers did what they were commanded and defended your freedom. Without people willing to kill or be killed for the rights of others, you would live under the rule of the person who was the most brutal. Violent and cruel people can only be stopped by violence. You ...
No, anyone killed is not murder, no. You don't understand the free speech at all. The ONLY REASON WE HAVE IT is because someone faught to keep us FREE.
WHEN did they defend my freedom? I am not doubting that some time in the DISTANT PAST they did, but currently, they are protecting the interests of the bourgeoisie - the capitalists. Anyone with any sense can see this... Only if the state read your constitution and what the founding fathers said.. NO, clearly, the STATE of the COUNTRY, YES THE GOVERNMENT AND ITS INSTITUITIONS grant us IT.
@Brisbain - Of course Obama said that, he is not going to announce to the public that he is going to send troops to a pointless war, like lambs to the slaughter, is he? I am sure many of the people commenting here would see my imprisoned for treason or something.
I hear ya roche. But it works both ways. And there is nothing really to work out as far as I'm concerned. BTW roche, they stopped tar and feathering people around 50 years ago.
Dear Administrator. I don't mean to but in. If this is not my place , I do apologise. I haven't been posting in the political threads for very long. One thing I have noticed. I don't think I have read , a political thread here on the DB , that has not went off topic. Its normally isn't one poster involved. It seems like once it starts , it just goes way off base. Not purposely. My own observation , it just seems to be the...
Originally Posted By: brisbain Didn't work out too well for us either. We were just as impetuous. Yes. History has yet to unfold. Especially for the Officer Corps. They finally did get it right. Not unlike many US military campaigns. The military/political question for me is this: Will the Iraq war be seen as "building up" the Officer Corps or destroying it. It depends what happens in the next ten years. Also, the...
Here's my take. The soldier is probably telling the truth as he sees it. Is this requirement to get the ok to shoot back an O'Bama dictate? No. Maybe the general that runs these groups of soldiers is a wacko. That is what I would pursue if I was the mom of this soldier. But one would have to be careful cause if you tick off his leaders, they could give him more dangerous missions.
Originally Posted By: brisbain Originally Posted By: Stacy I'm talking about now, adding a third to the mix. This is why I advocate brains over brawn. This is a matter for diplomacy and yes, politics. The relation between Pakistan and al Queda is fraying. We would do much better with cooperation and GOOD detective work than random bombs. Let bin Laden weaken his own position, and be ready to take him or gather some conclusive evidence...
Quote: Why are there so many people making so many posts with nothing in them that relates to the topic being discussed? Well there was supposed to be a day off for Veteran's Day and it kinda went off topic. We are waiting for President Obama to either pull out completely or send in 40,000 more troops.
Originally Posted By: meonlyits Yes I do. Plus his logic was very faulty. He believed that we should have a military but one where the soldiers were free to question orders or even the validity of the war. Now if a general asks you to blow up a village of civilian, that one could question, but in general if the soldiers questioned every order or even many of them, then what we would have is a disfunctional military which is equal to no...
I may buy one of these freeboards when i'm in Toronto... I may buy one of these freeboards when i'm in Toronto next week: http://www.freeboard.ca/ It's a skateboard that rides like a snowboard!!!
03:22 PM June 27, 2008
from web
Thread profile page for "Critique of soldiers - http://www.drugbuyers.com/freeboard" on http://www.drugbuyers.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Critique of soldiers - http://www.drugbuyers.com/freeboard", located on the Message Board at http://www.drugbuyers.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity