So I am in need of a new wheelset and I have narrowed my search to these two. From what I have learned the c29ssmax is a pretty stout wheel. I am wondering if the Flow rim laced to CK hubs will be as strong and easy to take care of as the mavic. Any thoughts on both would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
I think that both would be sweet wheelsets. I can say that I have customers riding a set of flows on king hubs on their mtn tandem and they smash the crap out of the wheels. I think the biggest difference is the ability to run tubeless with almost any tire on the stans rims and being more relegated to UST or tubeless tires, which are generally heavier and aren't available is popular tread ...
to possibly lighten the build up a bit do you think the Stans Arch rims would be suitable? I am about 170lbs, race sometimes, and will always run tubeless. thanks for the replys already, keep'em coming!
I had the C29ssmax for a year and i replace it with the stan for the follwoing reasonses:
1. Moving to 20mm excel, the 9mm is real flexy
2. after almost one year of usage the rear hub on the mavic break, its seems like a common problem since 29er wheels generate more power with the hub was not desing for.
The Flow laced to CK should be a much more stiff and durable build. The CK will outlast the Mavic hubs as well. As far as rims go, the Flows are pretty easy to use. Tires can be taken on and off really easily. I use Stan's yellow tape and that's it, though I do use UST or Tubeless-Ready tires.
I use the Arch rim with King hubs and love them. I weigh 180 and have had not problems with the wheel set. I have been riding on them for about 8 months.
Brian
Quote:
Originally Posted by sthrnfat
If you go with stans, then the builder is the key to stiff and long lasting wheels. Spending big bucks on the parts and going with an inexperienced builder will only lead to an expensive mistake.
2nd that! The builder is key and that is why I only buy wheels that are assembled at Stan's. I've ...
kings with supercomp and archs should be same weight than the crossmax. this wheelset should be much more reliable than the mavics and at least as stiff. stans are great for tubeless as well, UST are hardly available as 29ers anyhow.
the flow rim is much wider than crossmax.
My Crossmax29 hub blew up after 8 months. I was surprised to see the scoring under the free hub body. Mavic replaced it under warranty but the down time was 3 + weeks. It's too bad the hub issue cannot get sorted out as it seems to be a common thread.
I just purchased Arch rims with CK hubs. Sounds like a solid option and if I am not happy I can build them with Flows. Thanks to everyone for their input.
Stans Flow with Kings. No question in my mind which I'd rather have... but then again it's what I run. I've been running two sets since over a year ago without a single problem. Great rims and great hubs. The mavics... maybe decent rims, but proprietary spokes and subpar hub... no thanks.
In regards to arch vs flow. Depends on what you're looking for. Do you value stiffness and a wider...
Quote: Originally Posted by gjenkins@ do the Hopes have 3 or 6 Pawls? Here is a link to universal cycles that gives the info. http://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...s.php?id=17038
Quote: Originally Posted by rileymeister So I am in need of a new wheelset and I have narrowed my search to these two. From what I have learned the c29ssmax is a pretty stout wheel. I am wondering if the Flow rim laced to CK hubs will be as strong and easy to take care of as the mavic. Any thoughts on both would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! choose 36x4 lace pattern on CK Flow with brass nipples. I love my wheels......
I've been using chris king hubs for years and have the crossmax's also have alot of time on hadleys,over all the chris kings are less durable in my experience.I have to replace the hub body yearly on the king,have done nothing on two years of riding crossmaxs,still tight and smooth hadley hubs are my alltime favorite,durable easy to maintain and there engagement is bliss.if you ever rode 108 or 72 engagement you'll know what...
Quote: Originally Posted by cruso414 the pro 2 singlespeed hub has more engagement points than the standard hub.(48 vs 24) Not as many as King or I9 but half the price. do the Hopes have 3 or 6 Pawls?
Quote: Originally Posted by ncfisherman Have you owned the C29ssmaxes or any crossmax set? I assume you have not. Proprietary spokes & nipples, sure...but crappy hubs?? Durability is not there with CK, but the engagement is right there. They are also plenty stiff, in my experience. Dont get me wrong, I would go with the flow set(I have a 26" set, love em). Much better option, for the money. Yes. C29ssmaxes and Crossmax SL and the...
Quote: Originally Posted by sthrnfat If you go with stans, then the builder is the key to stiff and long lasting wheels. Spending big bucks on the parts and going with an inexperienced builder will only lead to an expensive mistake. 2nd that! The builder is key and that is why I only buy wheels that are assembled at Stan's. I've had Hope/355s, I9s/355s, and now I'm using 240s/355s. They have needed very little maintenance. On...
The 108s used to blow up with regular frequency, though the engagement was sweet. The 72s are much more durable but the engagement is almost exactly like a King.
I think that both would be sweet wheelsets. I can say that I have customers riding a set of flows on king hubs on their mtn tandem and they smash the crap out of the wheels. I think the biggest difference is the ability to run tubeless with almost any tire on the stans rims and being more relegated to UST or tubeless tires, which are generally heavier and aren't available is popular tread patterns such as the Racing Ralphs. Another thing...
Thread profile page for "C29ssmax vs. Stans Flow" on http://www.mtbr.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "C29ssmax vs. Stans Flow", located on the Message Board at http://www.mtbr.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity