Thread: Bugatti Veyron 16.4 vs SSC Ultimate Aero - Page 2 - Ultimatecarpage.com forums

Such speed figures are totally meaningless in the real world anyway.

Quote: Originally Posted by GO AMERICA!!! WOW you cant make up words and think your cool... just linking this statement back to this; Quote: Originally Posted by GO AMERICA!!! ok, lets start with the facts... The Bugatti Veyron 16.4 makes 61 hp per liter. The SSC Ultimate Aero makes 204 hp per liter. My brothers BONE STOCK 04 Mach 1 mustang makes 72 hp per liter... WTF Bugatti? SO now that we now which car has more engineering in it we can...

A couple of corrections for terrorbyte73: The Veyron and the F1 set their speed record on the german track of Ehra Lessien ( Map - Google Sightseeing ), property of VW. The SSC set its record on a road in Washington, closed to traffic for the occasion. No one uses Nardò for high speed recorda as the banking is preventing the cars from reaching their actual top speed, hence the figure is either lower or achieved adjusting the speed reached by...

Quote: Originally Posted by haymah I'd take the veyron. It is..... as crazy as this may sound, more practical than the SSC. I mean, it has a nav system in the rear view mirror. The brand name is also a big deciding factor. True, volkswagon is a lot more practical than any company with supercars in the name.

WOW you cant make up words and think your cool...

Quote: Originally Posted by roosterjuicer Yeah right, corvette's are probably some of the most reliable "supercars" on the road today. Bugattis have never been known for their reliability i dunno where you are getting your ideas from. if you are talking about durability and "lasting 10 years" that should go in favor of the car featuring the corvette motor not the car featuring a 16 cylinder...

Quote: Originally Posted by GO AMERICA!!! Its practically a FORD... which means it can fixed with a hammer! That's just about the worst insult to this car possible, as you're not only implying that it'll explode into a ball of flames thanks to faulty ignition, but you're calling a Chevy practically a Ford? Quote: Originally Posted by GO AMERICA!!! Nobody cares, besides British people are still gay homo's. and no im...

Quote: Originally Posted by The_Canuck Honestly, the SSC looks like ass. You can't outrun ugly even at 250+ miles per hour. And the Veyron doesn't? It looks like a turtle...

Quote: Originally Posted by Bleeding Heart The SSC ain't that ugly actually, it's better looking than an Enzo or a Zonda actually... But what the hell... They're supercars, they're not made to be pretty... They're designed to slice through air efficiently for them to go fast... You could argue that some are, but for the most part I'd agree. Form usually follows function but some freedom is there.

Quote: Originally Posted by Bleeding Heart Well... being too stable will probably make your speed run be boring... im not sure how fast you have driven, but i have done 140, and at that speed you like the car to be stable. your focus is on everything outside the car, paying attention for sounds of anything inside the car that may be breaking and sending you skidding into the trees, and the last thing you want to be worrying about is the car...