Thread: BREAKING: Scozzafava suspends NY 23 campaign
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago by docray
http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/1009/BREAK ING_Scozzafava_drops_out_of_NY_23.html
Republican Dede Scozzafava has suspended her bid in next Tuesday’s NY 23 special election, a huge development that dramatically shakes up the race. She did not endorse either of her two opponents -- Conservative party candidate Doug Hoffman or Democrat Bill Owens.
The decision to suspend her ...
Now that's interesting.
High marks for Scozzafava here, imo. Rather than split the conservative vote and let the Dem have a shot at winning, bows out and puts country ahead of personal ambition. Very big of her.
Is it too much to hope that John McCain might do the same when he comes up for re-election?
Big_Mike wrote: Now that's interesting.
High marks for Scozzafava here, imo. Rather than split the conservative vote and let the Dem have a shot at winning, bows out and puts country ahead of personal ambition. Very big of her.
Is it too much to hope that John McCain might do the same when he comes up for re-election?
yep and here is a little history on her, seems shes not ...
lightoftruth wrote: This should be the first win in the "C" column. Are we watching the birth of a viable national third party????
Not really..the Conservative Party of New York is precisely that...New York..and has in previous elections backed Democratic candidates as well as Republicans.
Big_Mike wrote: Now that's interesting.
High marks for Scozzafava here, imo. Rather than split the conservative vote and let the Dem have a shot at winning, bows out and puts country ahead of personal ambition. Very big of her.
Is it too much to hope that John McCain might do the same when he comes up for re-election?
I take this back.
Now that Scozzafava has backed the ...
I wouldn't have backed the Dem that way, but I can sure understand being sore about the idiot right pulling what they did on her. In fact, I would argue that elements of the GOP, currently controlling elements, first betrayed her.
tom_in_sac wrote: I wouldn't have backed the Dem that way, but I can sure understand being sore about the idiot right pulling what they did on her. In fact, I would argue that elements of the GOP, currently controlling elements, first betrayed her.
As a conservative who also happens to support a third party, the bickering amongst Republicans only provides amusement to me. This ...
In 1992, I was all about a third party to shake things up a bit. And for the first time, it looked like a viable third candidate was forthcoming, in the form of Ross Perot. That year was the first in a long time that someone was elected to POTUS with less that 50% of the vote, namely William Jefferson Clinton.
This time, instead of a viable third candidate, we're lacking a viable second ...
tom_in_sac wrote: Super Cat wrote: I've always been accustomed to the person who was right calling the person who was wrong stupid, not the other way around. Crazy world, eh? Not so crazy after all. I said Owens would win, and now that the votes are counted, he did. That extends the Dem grip on the House. LOL You said he'd win by a horse length. +5 points was your prediction wasn't it? Well, had...
How would you know? You're a RINO, a moderate, and you have no place to go. The dems don't want you, they want to get rid of the blue dogs. We don't want you because you only ruin the republican party with your lack of core beliefs, you don't have the support of the libertarians because they, like conservatives have principles too, and you don't have your own political party. Talk about loose-in-the-head...
Thoughtless wrote: AlterEgo wrote: lightoftruth wrote: This should be the first win in the "C" column. Are we watching the birth of a viable national third party???? No NO NO NO NO NO third party. What we need is a conservative take over of the republican party. We need to exorcise the RINO's from the party, kick out the current leadership, force them to switch to the dem party. because that is where they...
Big_Mike wrote: Tsalagi1 wrote: AlterEgo wrote: lightoftruth wrote: This should be the first win in the "C" column. Are we watching the birth of a viable national third party???? No NO NO NO NO NO third party. What we need is a conservative take over of the republican party. We need to exorcise the RINO's from the party, kick out the current leadership, force them to switch to the dem party. because that is...
insidedge wrote: Election outcome, very close, but Hoffman (C) lost, 46% to 49% in favor of Owens (D). And even tho' Scozzafava (R) bowed out she got 5%. This is a traditionally republican area. A democrat hasn't won there for many years. Conservatives sent a strong message to the republican party for its social liberal choice, but it didn't turn out in a win for either the republican or...
insidedge wrote: Election outcome, very close, but Hoffman (C) lost, 46% to 49% in favor of Owens (D). And even tho' Scozzafava (R) bowed out she got 5%. This is a traditionally republican area. A democrat hasn't won there for many years. Conservatives sent a strong message to the republican party for its social liberal choice, but it didn't turn out in a win for either the republican or...
tom_in_sac wrote: Super Cat wrote: I've always been accustomed to the person who was right calling the person who was wrong stupid, not the other way around. Crazy world, eh? Not so crazy after all. I said Owens would win, and now that the votes are counted, he did. That extends the Dem grip on the House. The election of Scuzzyfava would have done the same. Owens is not an ideological democrat. He was a...
Lynne wrote: insidedge wrote: Election outcome, very close, but Hoffman (C) lost, 46% to 49% in favor of Owens (D). And even tho' Scozzafava (R) bowed out she got 5%. This is a traditionally republican area. A democrat hasn't won there for many years. Conservatives sent a strong message to the republican party for its social liberal choice, but it didn't turn out in a win for either the republican...
tom_in_sac wrote: AlterEgo wrote: I think you have a major claim on "thundering stupidity" T I S, we can review the conservatives "lack of cohesion" tomorrow when the party takes not only all the races in Virginia, but the governorship of NJ also. Then I eat my share of crow. But thundering stupidity would be to think the three races in NY, NJ and VA were clear evidence of a right-wing resurgence in...
http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/1009/BREAKING_Scozzafava_drops_out_of_NY_23.html Republican Dede Scozzafava has suspended her bid in next Tuesday’s NY 23 special election, a huge development that dramatically shakes up the race. She did not endorse either of her two opponents -- Conservative party candidate Doug Hoffman or Democrat Bill Owens. The decision to suspend her campaign is a boost for Hoffman, who already had the...
RT @ charyl : BREAKING: Scozzafava suspends NY 23... RT @ charyl : BREAKING: Scozzafava suspends NY 23 campaign http://bit.ly/3irRIS // awesome, the wingnuts are taking over the GOP! #p2 #topprog about 8 hours ago from TweetDeck
Wow! Clearing the way for a Hoffman victory! RT @... Wow! Clearing the way for a Hoffman victory! RT @ billkneer : BREAKING: Scozzafava suspends NY 23 campaign: http://bit.ly/374vRB via @ addthis 10:01 AM Oct 31st from Echofon
Thread profile page for "BREAKING: Scozzafava suspends NY 23 campaign" on http://www.perspectives.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "BREAKING: Scozzafava suspends NY 23 campaign", located on the Message Board at http://www.perspectives.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity