Thread: Arthur Jones HIT Routine

Quote: Originally Posted by HDROB Discussing HIT objectively is one thing--sat on our arses. Providing video footage is subjective, especially if it relates to the arguement put forward. And it has then everything to do with the above points. I feel it takes the discussion beyond what we read on the computer screen. You haven't answered the question. What would providing a picture prove or disprove regarding my previously mentioned...

Quote: Originally Posted by iron addict You have never looked outside your small circle of knowledge or other training modalities. Nor have you looked at the science. Powerlifters as a group don't lift to failure, bodybuilders as a whole don't lift to failure in MOST circles. Yet they are all growing and amongst the most heavily muscled people on the planet. To believe failure is a prerequisite for growth stimulation is a completely...

One last post here in the locked thread I have no idea how/why the HIT jedi's have got this bad. HDROB, took the time to send me a PM that basically stated that while he understood I possessed scientific knowledge and practical knowledge he did not, none of it was worth a shit and then went on to state: Well I wouldn't give you, your training business, and any utterance of your past experiences the steam off my shit. LOL. Put that in...

havnt dorian yates and mentzer been successful with hit tho? some of the posts above make it seem like it doesnt work at all.

Just on a side note. I looked at a thread that Natural1 participated in on that HIT board he is talking about. And, it really just shows, when you have a presupposition, you hold on to that for dear life, regardless of the evidence and rationale against that very presupposition. Not a single person dealt with the necessary issues in Natural1's responses. To each their own I suppose, but dogmatism gets you nowhere fast when it flies in the...

Quote: Originally Posted by Natural1 You haven't answered the question. What would providing a picture prove or disprove regarding my previously mentioned points? Honestly, this could go on for another ten pages if I let it. It's turning into a circle jerk of "answer my question" - "well you haven't answered mine" - "well you first" - Blah blah blah. I see this every time...

I think McRoberts' (Hardgainer) type HIT is better than the others that have been mentioned. Cycles are key.

I'm not qualified to say but there must be some middle ground somewhere between to two!

I'm not saying HIT won't work for you but there's a good reason why it has died in the fitness world.

Quote: Originally Posted by iron addict There are MUCH better ways to go about this. Darden is STILL showing Casey Viatar is his "proof" that this method works, never mind that Casey built most of his muscle doing traditional BB'ing routines. IA Nevermind that the whole "Colorado Experiment" with Casey Viator was a complete scam. They never mentioned that Viator was RE-gaining muscle after a long...