Warmongers or peacemakers. Which will be responsible for scorching the earth? President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for work he has yet to do. Let's examine the central premise of that award -- the idea that negotiation, diplomacy and compromise is preferable to war. Well, duh. That's seems like a perfectly self evident premise in general. What turns this into a dangerous idea ...
Jimmy Carter negotiated with the Iranians for 444 days trying to get them to release American hostages. For this he was openly mocked by the Iranians for his weakness. A few minutes after Reagan became President the hostages were released. Why? Because the Iranians feared Reagan. Pretty interesting interpretation. Operation Eagle Claw was negotiation? And here I thought it was a ...
Frequently in history it has been the case that the people who liberals call warmongers are the ones who make and keep the peace, and the people they call peacemakers are the ones who get us into war. It's usually the case.
Frequently in history it has been the case that the people who liberals call warmongers are the ones who make and keep the peace, and the people they call peacemakers are the ones who get us into war. When have the warmongers who make and keep the peace done so without making war? And how many times have the warmongers who make and keep the peace started unnecessary wars - you ...
"Frequently in history it has been the case that the people who liberals call warmongers are the ones who make and keep the peace, and the people they call peacemakers are the ones who get us into war." Blessed are the warmongers! Oh! Wait! Never mind. Ken
Pretty interesting interpretation. Operation Eagle Claw was negotiation? And here I thought it was a failed military operation. The Iranians feared Reagan? That's a nice interpretation, forgetting that Carter's negotiations resulted in the Algiers Accords - agreed to and signed BEFORE Reagan. Reagan had been elected and took office one day after the accords were signed. In other ...
When have the warmongers who make and keep the peace done so without making war? And how many times have the warmongers who make and keep the peace started unnecessary wars - you know - like Iraq? Yes, I'm sure that if the British had repulsed Germany when they first invaded the Rhineland in 1936, which would have prevented WWII, liberals to this day would still be decrying that as an...
Yes, I'm sure that if the British had repulsed Germany when they first invaded the Rhineland in 1936, which would have prevented WWII, liberals to this day would still be decrying that as an unnecessary military action. Likewise, we prevented what might well have ended up being a much larger conflict by removing Saddam. Wonderful analogy. You should teach history. Abe...
Let's examine the central premise of that award -- the idea that negotiation, diplomacy and compromise is preferable to war. Well, duh. That's seems like a perfectly self evident premise in general. And yet, there are so many who don't see it. For example, when Hitler marched into the Rhineland in 1936 in violation of sanctions imposed on Germany by the League of Nations a hot ...
Yes, I'm sure that if the British had repulsed Germany when they first invaded the Rhineland in 1936, which would have prevented WWII, liberals to this day would still be decrying that as an unnecessary military action. Indeed.
Let's examine the central premise of that award -- the idea that negotiation, diplomacy and compromise is preferable to war. Well, duh. That's seems like a perfectly self evident premise in general. And yet, there are so many who don't see it. If there are so many, name ONE. Some moderate you are.
When have the warmongers who make and keep the peace done so without making war? And how many times have the warmongers who make and keep the peace started unnecessary wars - you know - like Iraq? Yes, I'm sure that if the British had repulsed Germany when they first invaded the Rhineland in 1936, which would have prevented WWII, liberals to this day would still be decrying that as an unnecessary military action. Likewise, we prevented...
Frequently in history it has been the case that the people who liberals call warmongers are the ones who make and keep the peace, and the people they call peacemakers are the ones who get us into war. When have the warmongers who make and keep the peace done so without making war? And how many times have the warmongers who make and keep the peace started unnecessary wars - you know - like Iraq? Just askin'
"Frequently in history it has been the case that the people who liberals call warmongers are the ones who make and keep the peace, and the people they call peacemakers are the ones who get us into war." Blessed are the warmongers! Oh! Wait! Never mind. Ken
Let's examine the central premise of that award -- the idea that negotiation, diplomacy and compromise is preferable to war. Well, duh. That's seems like a perfectly self evident premise in general. And yet, there are so many who don't see it. For example, when Hitler marched into the Rhineland in 1936 in violation of sanctions imposed on Germany by the League of Nations a hot series of diplomatic letters and negotiations...
Yes, I'm sure that if the British had repulsed Germany when they first invaded the Rhineland in 1936, which would have prevented WWII, liberals to this day would still be decrying that as an unnecessary military action. Likewise, we prevented what might well have ended up being a much larger conflict by removing Saddam. Wonderful analogy. You should teach history. Abe
Jimmy Carter negotiated with the Iranians for 444 days trying to get them to release American hostages. For this he was openly mocked by the Iranians for his weakness. A few minutes after Reagan became President the hostages were released. Why? Because the Iranians feared Reagan. ..this is an absolute lie.. ..carter did negotiate the release of the hostages.. ..it was george bush senior who flew to spain to 'negotiate' with the...
Why? Because the Iranians feared Reagan. And they feared him so because??? ...he took a microphone in a New Hampshire debate? ..he was head of the California National Guard for a few years? ..he played a cowboy in some "B" movies? Seriously, what is it that Ronald Reagan did in the first few minutes of his administration - or even in the years preceding that to engender this terrible fear you think the Iranians had of him?...
"Seriously, what is it that Ronald Reagan did in the first few minutes of his administration - or even in the years preceding that to engender this terrible fear you think the Iranians had of him?" He didn't have to do anything. The loopy left did it for him by portraying him as a trigger happy warmongerer. Iran just assumed he would immediately send them back to the stoneage and surrendered without Reagan having to...
Saad Eddin Ibrahim: "Precedents in American foreign... Saad Eddin Ibrahim: "Precedents in American foreign policy" for attaching conditions to foreign aid... Egypt currently largest Arab recip.
10:14 AM Aug 17th
from web
Thread profile page for "American Foreign Policy" on http://www.fool.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "American Foreign Policy", located on the Message Board at http://www.fool.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity