Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: 45-70 govt vs 500 smith and wesson

Started 2 months ago by Mr Bernoulli
45-70 govt vs 500 smith and wesson I was looking at some of those H&R/NEF handi rifles and you can get them chambered in either. I want it for a brush gun for deer drives etc. What would you guys get and what do you think the pros and cons of each are?
Site: THR  THR - site profile
Forum: Rifle Country  Rifle Country - forum profile
Total authors: 24 authors
Total thread posts: 80 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: thehighroad.org

Other posts in this thread:

jbech123 replied 2 months ago
45-70 has many more options for loads. You can get easy on the shoulder cowboy loads to absolute sledgehammers that approach 458 win mag. In a rifle, I can't see what the 500 S&W brings to the table.

dakotasin replied 2 months ago
in a rifle if it is an either/or decision i'd opt for the 45-70 due to versatility...

alemonkey replied 2 months ago
But with the .500 you can brag to your buddies that you have a fitty. __________________ If you live in Nebraska you should be a member of the Nebraska Firearms Owners Association (membership is free!): http://www.nefirearm.com/

alemonkey replied 2 months ago
But with the .500 you can brag to your buddies that you have a fitty.

Maverick223 replied 2 months ago
.45-70Govt. is much cheaper to feed (whether you reload or not), is more versatile (someone has been developing loads for it to do whatever you want for the last 136 yrs), you can find ammo locally if necessary, and it is not likely to become obsolete for another 136 years or so. Best of all you can put big holes in big mean things (like big angry trash cans filled with water or ...

Maverick223 replied 2 months ago
.45-70Govt. is much cheaper to feed (whether you reload or not), is more versatile (someone has been developing loads for it to do whatever you want for the last 136 yrs), you can find ammo locally if necessary, and it is not likely to become obsolete for another 136 years or so. Best of all you can put big holes in big mean things (like big angry trash cans filled with water or the past 20yrs ...

kragluver replied 2 months ago
If you want to brag about having "a fifty", get a muzzle loader and shoot .50 or .54 cal round ball. Its a hoot and you'll learn more about shooting the way our GG grandfathers did it!

achildofthesky replied 2 months ago
45-70, not even a choice really... Much more options in factory and with reloading it breathes fire or rolls them out the bore. __________________ "It's better to be the stomper than the stompee"

achildofthesky replied 2 months ago
45-70, not even a choice really... Much more options in factory and with reloading it breathes fire or rolls them out the bore.

Maverick223 replied 2 months ago
Quote: If you want to brag about having "a fifty", get a muzzle loader and shoot .50 or .54 cal round ball. I am pretty certain that Ale was joking...and I know that I was. There is no magic that a .50cal can perform that a .458 can't.

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
saturno_v
17
user's latest post:
45-70 govt vs 500 smith and...
Published (2009-11-03 17:15:00)
Quote: Understood. The 45-70 is one of those cartridges loaded to lower pressures. I don't know the numbers off the top of my head, but I believe that standard factory smokeless 45-70 loads use less pressure than the tropical Express loads. The point of my previous post was to point out that just because the Express cartridges used a lower pressure than the standard it didn't mean they were weak Of course they are not Maverick...
Maverick223
13
user's latest post:
45-70 govt vs 500 smith and...
Published (2009-11-03 14:15:00)
Quote: When comparing straight on ballistics from reloading books, etc, don't forget to calculate for the longer barrel of the .500 rifle you are looking at. Most all load data is for an 8 3/8" barreled revolver, or maybe 10" test barrel, not a 16-22" rifle barrel... The data that I used was for a 15" T/C barrel, I couldn't find any longer bbl for the 500S&W, though I doubt that velocity...
ArmedBear
12
user's latest post:
45-70 govt vs 500 smith and...
Published (2009-11-03 19:40:00)
Quote: A .500 S&W Magnum is a modern version of the old .50-70 and if you choose to load with rifle powders when shooting in a rifle you will exceed the capabilities of the older .50-70. The .50-70 sucked in 1870 and it sucks now. There's a reason it was replaced by the .45-70 after only a few years of service in the military, and never gained any popularity outside the military. The .45-70 lasted as a military round until the...
BMF500
6
user's latest post:
45-70 govt vs 500 smith and...
Published (2009-11-02 19:13:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by SharpsDressedMan When comparing straight on ballistics from reloading books, etc, don't forget to calculate for the longer barrel of the .500 rifle you are looking at. Most all load data is for an 8 3/8" barreled revolver, or maybe 10" test barrel, not a 16-22" rifle barrel....... Excellent point. Anyone have a formula for this? __________________ You need to ease up with that Jihad...
MistWolf
4
user's latest post:
45-70 govt vs 500 smith and...
Published (2009-11-03 17:10:00)
Understood. The 45-70 is one of those cartridges loaded to lower pressures. I don't know the numbers off the top of my head, but I believe that standard factory smokeless 45-70 loads use even less pressure for less performance than the tropical Express loads. The object of my previous post was to point out that just because the Express cartridges used a lower pressure than the standard it didn't mean they were weak
Mr Bernoulli
3
user's latest post:
45-70 govt vs 500 smith and wesson
Published (2009-10-30 10:15:00)
ok sounds like the 45-70! I was more leaning toward this for these reasons such as handloading etc because I would like to get into it very soon. I just wanted to see what everyone thought. Thanks guys!
alemonkey
3
user's latest post:
45-70 govt vs 500 smith and wesson
Published (2009-10-31 12:33:00)
I agree the only reason to get a .500 rifle is if you already have a .500 revolver. But you could get a BFR in 45-70.... 45-70 is much more versatile and is one of the easiest calibers to handload.
SharpsDressedMan
3
user's latest post:
45-70 govt vs 500 smith and...
Published (2009-11-03 18:44:00)
The stop/kill a horse thing is interesting. I would think that any round that hit the horse hard enough that he didn't want to carry a rider anymore would be sufficient enough for the task. It wouldn't necessarily need to kill the horse, only stop him.
achildofthesky
2
user's latest post:
45-70 govt vs 500 smith and wesson
Published (2009-10-28 22:16:00)
45-70, not even a choice really... Much more options in factory and with reloading it breathes fire or rolls them out the bore. __________________ "It's better to be the stomper than the stompee"
kragluver
2
user's latest post:
45-70 govt vs 500 smith and wesson
Published (2009-10-30 19:02:00)
When you shoot a .45-70, you aren't just shooting any old cartridge, you are shooting history.

Related threads on "THR":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "45-70 govt vs 500 smith and wesson" on http://www.thehighroad.org. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "45-70 govt vs 500 smith and wesson", located on the Message Board at http://www.thehighroad.org. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity