Thread: 200 ES Big Red vs. 250 ES Big red....

but in most cases you can't touch a 250es for under 600, my 200es was 300

Quote: Originally Posted by old honda dealr The majority are big reds mainly 85,86,87 and rumored to have 2 or 3 late production 87's or early 88 model 3 wheelers. Have you ever discovered if there were any 1988 Big Reds among that lot of yours?

Sweeeet mother of GOD!!! Those pics of all those Big Reds.....B-E-A-U-T-I-F-U-L!!!

Quote: Originally Posted by nouseforaname90 The 250SX is pretty much the same as the 250ES, so I can talk here. I personally like the 250SX over my dads 200ES.. they have much more power and the reverse is a snap. Not to mention the SX is suspended and the 250SX/ES look so much cooler than the 200ES. I totally agree. A 250sx and a 250 big red are no doubt better bikes than a 200 big red. A 200 big red is just a remake of a 200m with reverse...

i have both and for pulling and mudding the 200es is the best and for trail,jump the 250es is the best, and both goes at the same speed

250 ES Big Red

i like the big red 200e/es but come on,look at skiffy's 250es.no other utility trike comes close to this http://www.3wheelerworldforums.com/s...ad.php?t=98839

i know i probably have a bias opinion but for my needs i go for the 200ES. i had a shot at either the 250 or the 200 but i wanted the 200. i dont do trail riding (much) or jumping so i dont need suspension. i pull loads, i mudbog, i do creek crossing, etc. sure ill give you the fact that for speed or trail riding the 250 is king but thats not my style anyways. i want a machine that will float, pull, and be agile and light. that is the...

I do sort of prefer a 250 BR, but I do like the chain drive 200e's and 200m's, and they would be my favorite if they had reverse.

Search this Thread