Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Thread: 1911 Comparison...Springfield Mil-Spec or Taurus PT1911

Started 1 month, 1 week ago by ZakBradshaw
Ok, my Dad and I each have a 1911. He has the Springfield 1911A1 Mil-Spec, and since he got it he has put on Hogue grips, a stainless steel full length guide rod, and a stainless slide stop. I have a Taurus PT1911 Duotone and mine is brand new no additions, but stock it has extended beavertail, full length guide rod, ambidextrous safety, and Heinie sights. Which is better? Zak. Dad's Gun...
Site: 1911Forum   1911Forum  - site profile
Forum: General Gun Discussion  General Gun Discussion - forum profile
Total authors: 10 authors
Total thread posts: 12 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: 1911forum.com

Other posts in this thread:

goochracing replied 1 month, 1 week ago
taurus all the way, they are both made out of the country and are made in brazil. There are only a few complains about taurus, the safety and all that, but you usually replace something like that with one that you are at home with. I replaced mine with a wilson. Great gun for the money

Boss302 replied 1 month, 1 week ago
This thread will implode in 10, 9...

nking replied 1 month, 1 week ago
Quote: Originally Posted by Boss302 This thread will implode in 10, 9... You only have 13 posts and already know enough to make an accurate prediction. You're a quick learner! I would say your dad has the better gun. That's just my humble opinion. You like yours he likes his, why does it matter? Nate

BBQLS1 replied 1 month, 1 week ago
If I had to buy one or the other, it might be a hard choice. I just about need a beavertail. I owned a Mil-Spec and it would chew a hole in the web of my hand. I never felt it bite, but after 1-2 hundred rounds, it was obvious. Generally, I prefer SA though. To heck with a full length guide rod though. Give me the old GI guide rod.

RWW replied 1 month, 1 week ago
Dad's gun is MUCH nicer looking IMHO!!!! RWW

Loadedcolt45 replied 1 month, 1 week ago
I've never owned any of either maker's pistols but I've shot and handled both and I'd take the Springfield any day over the Taurus. Springfield would not be my first choice in a 1911 but if feels like a more "quality" weapon when compared to the Taurus. That is just my opinion - if your happy with your gun, my opinion really doasn't mean a thing.

sousana replied 1 month, 1 week ago
As the owner of 98 1911 platforms, and a shooter of said platform for 39 years, plus an owner of several of each, I'd have to say on a 10 point scale I'd give the Springfield a 9.5 to Taurus 8. Why? Both have excellent customer service, but, Springfield puts out a better quality controlled product, and it comes from a maker of forged frames and slides, Imbel, with decades of experience ...

ZakBradshaw replied 1 month, 1 week ago
Thanks for the replies. Yeah, it honestly doesnt matter because I do like my gun and he likes his gun, to each their own on style and accessory parts, I was just curious. We give each other a hard time about whose is better on all the guns we own. Just like I bought a Russian M44 rifle about 6 months ago, and when he got one he bragged that his was better because it had been refurbished at the...

mitrod3 replied 1 month, 1 week ago
Quote: Originally Posted by sousana As the owner of 98 1911 platforms, and a shooter of said platform for 39 years, plus an owner of several of each, I'd have to say on a 10 point scale I'd give the Springfield a 9.5 to Taurus 8. Why? Both have excellent customer service, but, Springfield puts out a better quality controlled product, ...

ZakBradshaw replied 1 month, 1 week ago
I do want to replace several parts on mine...beavertail, stide stop, guide rod, magazine release, etc...with the Wilson Combat stainless steel parts. Zak.

 

Top contributing authors

Name
Posts
ZakBradshaw
3
user's latest post:
1911 Comparison...Springfield...
Published (2009-11-10 13:44:00)
I do want to replace several parts on mine...beavertail, stide stop, guide rod, magazine release, etc...with the Wilson Combat stainless steel parts. Zak.
Boss302
1
user's latest post:
1911 Comparison...Springfield...
Published (2009-11-10 07:26:00)
This thread will implode in 10, 9...
goochracing
1
user's latest post:
1911 Comparison...Springfield...
Published (2009-11-10 06:51:00)
taurus all the way, they are both made out of the country and are made in brazil. There are only a few complains about taurus, the safety and all that, but you usually replace something like that with one that you are at home with. I replaced mine with a wilson. Great gun for the money
BBQLS1
1
user's latest post:
1911 Comparison...Springfield...
Published (2009-11-10 10:05:00)
If I had to buy one or the other, it might be a hard choice. I just about need a beavertail. I owned a Mil-Spec and it would chew a hole in the web of my hand. I never felt it bite, but after 1-2 hundred rounds, it was obvious. Generally, I prefer SA though. To heck with a full length guide rod though. Give me the old GI guide rod.
RWW
1
user's latest post:
1911 Comparison...Springfield...
Published (2009-11-10 10:09:00)
Dad's gun is MUCH nicer looking IMHO!!!! RWW
nking
1
user's latest post:
1911 Comparison...Springfield...
Published (2009-11-10 09:50:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Boss302 This thread will implode in 10, 9... You only have 13 posts and already know enough to make an accurate prediction. You're a quick learner! I would say your dad has the better gun. That's just my humble opinion. You like yours he likes his, why does it matter? Nate
sousana
1
user's latest post:
1911 Comparison...Springfield...
Published (2009-11-10 13:30:00)
As the owner of 98 1911 platforms, and a shooter of said platform for 39 years, plus an owner of several of each, I'd have to say on a 10 point scale I'd give the Springfield a 9.5 to Taurus 8. Why? Both have excellent customer service, but, Springfield puts out a better quality controlled product, and it comes from a maker of forged frames and slides, Imbel, with decades of experience using Colt manufactured machines. On my first...
Loadedcolt45
1
user's latest post:
1911 Comparison...Springfield...
Published (2009-11-10 11:18:00)
I've never owned any of either maker's pistols but I've shot and handled both and I'd take the Springfield any day over the Taurus. Springfield would not be my first choice in a 1911 but if feels like a more "quality" weapon when compared to the Taurus. That is just my opinion - if your happy with your gun, my opinion really doasn't mean a thing.
mitrod3
1
user's latest post:
1911 Comparison...Springfield...
Published (2009-11-10 13:43:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by sousana As the owner of 98 1911 platforms, and a shooter of said platform for 39 years, plus an owner of several of each, I'd have to say on a 10 point scale I'd give the Springfield a 9.5 to Taurus 8. Why? Both have excellent customer service, but, Springfield puts out a better quality controlled product, and it comes from a maker of forged frames and slides, Imbel, with decades of experience using Colt...
NonConformist
1
user's latest post:
1911 Comparison...Springfield...
Published (2009-11-10 14:04:00)
Id say they are more or less equal, I just like the SA because its sorta made in America and is an American Company

Related threads on "1911Forum ":

Related threads on other sites:

Thread profile page for "1911 Comparison...Springfield Mil-Spec or Taurus PT1911" on http://www.1911forum.com. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "1911 Comparison...Springfield Mil-Spec or Taurus PT1911", located on the Message Board at http://www.1911forum.com. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity