Thread: 1911 Comparison...Springfield Mil-Spec or Taurus PT1911
Started 1 month, 1 week ago by ZakBradshaw
Ok, my Dad and I each have a 1911. He has the Springfield 1911A1 Mil-Spec, and since he got it he has put on Hogue grips, a stainless steel full length guide rod, and a stainless slide stop. I have a Taurus PT1911 Duotone and mine is brand new no additions, but stock it has extended beavertail, full length guide rod, ambidextrous safety, and Heinie sights. Which is better? Zak.
Dad's Gun...
taurus all the way, they are both made out of the country and are made in brazil. There are only a few complains about taurus, the safety and all that, but you usually replace something like that with one that you are at home with. I replaced mine with a wilson. Great gun for the money
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss302
This thread will implode in 10, 9...
You only have 13 posts and already know enough to make an accurate prediction. You're a quick learner!
I would say your dad has the better gun. That's just my humble opinion. You like yours he likes his, why does it matter?
Nate
If I had to buy one or the other, it might be a hard choice. I just about need a beavertail. I owned a Mil-Spec and it would chew a hole in the web of my hand. I never felt it bite, but after 1-2 hundred rounds, it was obvious. Generally, I prefer SA though.
To heck with a full length guide rod though. Give me the old GI guide rod.
I've never owned any of either maker's pistols but I've shot and handled both and I'd take the Springfield any day over the Taurus. Springfield would not be my first choice in a 1911 but if feels like a more "quality" weapon when compared to the Taurus.
That is just my opinion - if your happy with your gun, my opinion really doasn't mean a thing.
As the owner of 98 1911 platforms, and a shooter of said platform for 39 years, plus an owner of several of each, I'd have to say on a 10 point scale I'd give the Springfield a 9.5 to Taurus 8.
Why? Both have excellent customer service, but, Springfield puts out a better quality controlled product, and it comes from a maker of forged frames and slides, Imbel, with decades of experience ...
Thanks for the replies. Yeah, it honestly doesnt matter because I do like my gun and he likes his gun, to each their own on style and accessory parts, I was just curious. We give each other a hard time about whose is better on all the guns we own. Just like I bought a Russian M44 rifle about 6 months ago, and when he got one he bragged that his was better because it had been refurbished at the...
Quote:
Originally Posted by sousana
As the owner of 98 1911 platforms, and a shooter of said platform for 39 years, plus an owner of several of each, I'd have to say on a 10 point scale I'd give the Springfield a 9.5 to Taurus 8. Why? Both have excellent customer service, but, Springfield puts out a better quality controlled product, ...
I do want to replace several parts on mine...beavertail, stide stop, guide rod, magazine release, etc...with the Wilson Combat stainless steel parts. Zak.
I do want to replace several parts on mine...beavertail, stide stop, guide rod, magazine release, etc...with the Wilson Combat stainless steel parts. Zak.
taurus all the way, they are both made out of the country and are made in brazil. There are only a few complains about taurus, the safety and all that, but you usually replace something like that with one that you are at home with. I replaced mine with a wilson. Great gun for the money
If I had to buy one or the other, it might be a hard choice. I just about need a beavertail. I owned a Mil-Spec and it would chew a hole in the web of my hand. I never felt it bite, but after 1-2 hundred rounds, it was obvious. Generally, I prefer SA though. To heck with a full length guide rod though. Give me the old GI guide rod.
Quote: Originally Posted by Boss302 This thread will implode in 10, 9... You only have 13 posts and already know enough to make an accurate prediction. You're a quick learner! I would say your dad has the better gun. That's just my humble opinion. You like yours he likes his, why does it matter? Nate
As the owner of 98 1911 platforms, and a shooter of said platform for 39 years, plus an owner of several of each, I'd have to say on a 10 point scale I'd give the Springfield a 9.5 to Taurus 8. Why? Both have excellent customer service, but, Springfield puts out a better quality controlled product, and it comes from a maker of forged frames and slides, Imbel, with decades of experience using Colt manufactured machines. On my first...
I've never owned any of either maker's pistols but I've shot and handled both and I'd take the Springfield any day over the Taurus. Springfield would not be my first choice in a 1911 but if feels like a more "quality" weapon when compared to the Taurus. That is just my opinion - if your happy with your gun, my opinion really doasn't mean a thing.
Quote: Originally Posted by sousana As the owner of 98 1911 platforms, and a shooter of said platform for 39 years, plus an owner of several of each, I'd have to say on a 10 point scale I'd give the Springfield a 9.5 to Taurus 8. Why? Both have excellent customer service, but, Springfield puts out a better quality controlled product, and it comes from a maker of forged frames and slides, Imbel, with decades of experience using Colt...
Thread profile page for "1911 Comparison...Springfield Mil-Spec or Taurus PT1911" on http://www.1911forum.com.
This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "1911 Comparison...Springfield Mil-Spec or Taurus PT1911", located on the Message Board at http://www.1911forum.com.
This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity