My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix | Thread profile

Thread profile page for "Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix" on http://www.topix.com/forum/med. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix", located on the Message Board at http://www.topix.com/forum/med. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity, which are reported in a table below. Additional thread profile information is also shown in the following ways:

1) Top Contributing Authors
2) Related Threads on "eBay Auctions"
3) Related Threads on Other Sites

Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a thread's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.

Title: Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix
Site: Medicine Forum - Topix  Medicine Forum - Topix - site profile
Forum: med  med - forum profile
Total authors: 76 authors
Total thread posts: 239 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: topix.com

Thread posts in Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix:

1. 
Started 3 months, 1 week ago (2008-08-28 09:06:41)  by not necessary
Judged: 2 2 1 I suffer from migraine headaches, and smoke is a major contributor to my headaches. I would love to be able to go out and not be affected by someone elses smoke. 9 out of 10 smokers don't smoke while they eat, so why should they smoke while I eat?
Size: 679 bytes
Customize:  Customize "Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix :: med :: Medicine Forum - Topix"
2. 
Started 3 months, 1 week ago (2008-08-28 08:13:41)  by Hmmmm
Aw Hell wrote: I do not go to non smoking restaurants because I smoke. If I were a non smoker I would go to non smoking restaurants. Isn't that a pretty simple idea? Well, the majority of Pulaski Countians do not smoke, but the majority of Pulaski County's public places permit smoking. So your "just go elsewhere" solution doesn't seem to make much sense ... logistically, ...
Size: 560 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 1</b>: Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix :: med :: Medicine Forum - Topix"
3. 
Started 3 months, 1 week ago (2008-08-28 08:37:41)  by A Smoker
who="Drew"]To J.R. Smith, Why don't you ask them to ban the sun from shining while you're at it? We all know that the sun causes skin cancer. From A Smoker, I agree and I bet if you had a sale on at a local department store advertised slightly and STRONG Cigarette smells CLOTHING HALF OFF the Antismoking Women would knock you down trying to get to the bargains.LOL And also a deal on Tanning bed ...
Size: 553 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 2</b>: Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix :: med :: Medicine Forum - Topix"
4. 
Started 3 months, 1 week ago (2008-08-28 09:03:41)  by Hugawolf
I'm a former smoker, however, I encourage others to smoke--just not near me. The reason for supporting and encouraging the smoking addiction is this: they more than likely will not live long enough to draw social security at age 65+...thus assuring me that the program will continue and I'll receive my benefits. Light up my friends and blow a little smoke on your friends and family, too. HMAO
Size: 394 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 3</b>: Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix :: med :: Medicine Forum - Topix"
5. 
Started 3 months, 1 week ago (2008-08-28 09:06:41)  by Aloxety
Judged: 1 Tarah wrote: I wouldn't agree that secondhand smoke is worse than primary smoke. It's not a matter of agreeing or disagreeing, it's simply not true. The RR of lung cancer for male smokers is 23.3. The RR for lung cancer among people exposed to SHS daily for decades is ~1.2. In other words, that non-smoker is 20% more likely to get lung cancer, while the smoker ...
Size: 835 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 4</b>: Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix :: med :: Medicine Forum - Topix"
6. 
Started 3 months, 1 week ago (2008-08-28 09:06:41)  by Aloxety
Judged: 1 "And since secondhand smoke is worse than primary smoke, it could be considered a deadly weapon." Where do people get this idea?
Size: 359 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 5</b>: Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix :: med :: Medicine Forum - Topix"
7. 
Started 3 months, 1 week ago (2008-08-28 09:06:41)  by Happy Contented Soul
Judged: 2 2 2 not necessary wrote: I suffer from migraine headaches, and smoke is a major contributor to my headaches. I would love to be able to go out and not be affected by someone elses smoke. 9 out of 10 smokers don't smoke while they eat, so why should they smoke while I eat? Take two aspirin and keep awwy from children.
Size: 859 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 6</b>: Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix :: med :: Medicine Forum - Topix"
8. 
Started 3 months, 1 week ago (2008-08-28 09:06:41)  by Free_America
This made me think of this video. http://veritasvincitprolibertate.wordpress.co...
Size: 218 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 7</b>: Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix :: med :: Medicine Forum - Topix"
9. 
Started 3 months, 1 week ago (2008-08-28 09:06:41)  by Drew
Judged: 2 2 1 To J.R. Smith, Why don't you ask them to ban the sun from shining while you're at it? We all know that the sun causes skin cancer.
Size: 562 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 8</b>: Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix :: med :: Medicine Forum - Topix"
10. 
Started 3 months, 1 week ago (2008-08-28 09:06:41)  by Freedom
Aloxety wrote: "And since secondhand smoke is worse than primary smoke, it could be considered a deadly weapon." Where do people get this idea? I'm sorry to say...but they get this idea when they have lost all reason. Once again...history repeats itself.
Size: 412 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 9</b>: Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix :: med :: Medicine Forum - Topix"
 

Top contributing authors for Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County - Topix

Name
Posts
Free_America
30
user's latest post:
Proposed smoking ban is good for...
Published (2008-09-01 09:16:27)
Judged: 2 2 2 Tanaya wrote: &quot;Free_America&quot; There is a huge backlash against the smoking bans. It has lasted longer in California because of the climate and the availability of outdoor seating. But it did affect their economy. Their growth in the hospitality industry was like 2% while the surrounding states had growth of 15-20%. Bans have always failed an there is no reason this one will be different. All of the states that I...
Tish
19
user's latest post:
Proposed smoking ban is good for...
Published (2008-09-02 03:32:15)
Judged: 1 you know, i've been very impressed by the amount of intelligent discussion that's happened on this issue. that doesn't extend to the hate and attacking posts made by zealots. at any rate, i find it a shame that most of this will go unnoticed by the local politicians, unless they happen to be looking on this forum. i do highly doubt any intelligent anti-ban letters make the newspapers or anywhere else. and the opposing...
harleyrider1978
14
user's latest post:
Proposed smoking ban is good for...
Published (2008-09-02 03:32:25)
Judged: 2 2 1 LiNdA wrote: &lt;quoted text&gt;hmmm, why do the hard core antis knock McCain and push Obama? Have you figured out yet what Obama will change America to? He keeps yelling change without saying what the change will be. Do you know that the people running Obamas campaign are GMMB partners and GMMB is the RWJF's big buddy company in the smoking bans? As a lifelong democrat it is so hard to say that the democrats are...
Tanaya
11
user's latest post:
Proposed smoking ban is good for...
Published (2008-09-01 09:16:27)
&quot;Free_America&quot; There is a huge backlash against the smoking bans. It has lasted longer in California because of the climate and the availability of outdoor seating. But it did affect their economy. Their growth in the hospitality industry was like 2% while the surrounding states had growth of 15-20%. Bans have always failed an there is no reason this one will be different. All of the states that I know of that have bans,...
generalsn1234567
11
user's latest post:
Proposed smoking ban is good for...
Published (2008-09-02 03:32:25)
Judged: 1 1 1 They are following page 7 of the advice that the tax exempt charities are publishing to keep the ban from reaching a ballot. The tax exempt charities published this 16 page book on how to get bans passed. This is where your contrubutions go. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/CIA_Fundamentals....
Azmac
10
user's latest post:
Proposed smoking ban is good for...
Published (2008-09-01 09:16:17)
Judged: 2 2 1 Tanaya wrote: &quot;Free_America&quot; Get a life. There are more non-smokers than smokers, as such there are more non-smoking establishments that don't allow smoking. If that is not the case in your area vote with dollars. Tell the managers and owners you won't patronize them if they don't accommodate you that you will take your business elsewhere. If they do not that should tell you that the majority of...
bljohnson
10
user's latest post:
Proposed smoking ban is good for...
Published (2008-09-02 03:32:15)
Judged: 1 1 Another major problem is that the newspapers in this area will not print any letters refuting the claims of the anti-smoking zealots. I have sent several e-mails asking for a fair representation of opposing views. Noe have been printed. Free_America wrote: &lt;quoted text&gt;Congratulations on quitting and sorry to hear about your husband. With aids it takes a fluid transfer. None of this negates the fact that this all...
lifes a beach
7
user's latest post:
Proposed smoking ban is good for...
Published (2008-09-01 09:16:06)
Judged: 2 Crazy 8 wrote: Whether smoking causes any ill effects or not. My childeren and YOURS have a right to go into public places without being exposed to secondhand smoke. Using some of the same logic as others have used....if a restaurant is smoke free and you can't make it for 30-45 minutes, eat your meals at home. Why should all of the rights go to the smokers? You're right in one aspect, all the rights should not go to the...
Freedom
6
user's latest post:
Proposed smoking ban is good for...
Published (2008-09-01 09:15:56)
Judged: 4 2 2 KHartman wrote: &lt;quoted text&gt; The most accurate information about the views of the views of the Surgeon General comes from his website: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/news/speeches/0... &quot;Secondhand smoke exposure causes heart disease and lung cancer in adults and sudden infant death syndrome and respiratory problems in children. There is NO risk-free level of secondhand smoke exposure, with even brief...
Crazy 8
6
user's latest post:
Proposed smoking ban is good for...
Published (2008-09-01 09:16:16)
lifes a beach wrote: &lt;quoted text&gt; So you are arbitrarily taking away rights of people because you don't agree with their lifestyle?!? I'm sure you would not appreciate someone telling you that you were not allowed to do certain LEGAL habits either such as drink or gamble. That is an extremely stupid statement and I suggest if you don't like smoking, don't subject yourself to areas that allow it. I could care...