My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading...

Frontloading - is it necessary? | Thread profile

Thread profile page for "Frontloading - is it necessary?" on http://www.muscletalk.co.uk. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Frontloading - is it necessary?", located on the Message Board at http://www.muscletalk.co.uk. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity, which are reported in a table below. Additional thread profile information is also shown in the following ways:

1) Top Contributing Authors
2) Related Threads on "eBay Auctions"
3) Related Threads on Other Sites

Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a thread's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.

Title: Frontloading - is it necessary?
Site: MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum  MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum - site profile
Forum: Testosterone & Other Steroids   Testosterone & Other Steroids   - forum profile
Total authors: 18 authors
Total thread posts: 39 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: muscletalk.co.uk

Thread posts in Frontloading - is it necessary?:

1. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-06-27 12:13:00)  by davidacarrick
Ive heard talks about people frontlosding on a cycle? Is this necessary?
Size: 136 bytes
Customize:  Customize "Frontloading - is it necessary? :: Testosterone & Other Steroids   :: MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum"
2. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-06-27 12:16:00)  by dementia
No not neccasary imo, personal choice. (in reply to davidacarrick )
Size: 193 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 1</b>: Frontloading - is it necessary? :: Testosterone & Other Steroids   :: MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum"
3. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-06-27 12:21:00)  by Jams
I've never frontloaded with shots (doubling the dose in the 1st week) but using dbol for the 1st 4weeks as a kickstart has always worked for me
Size: 276 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 2</b>: Frontloading - is it necessary? :: Testosterone & Other Steroids   :: MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum"
4. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-06-27 12:38:00)  by RACK
I've frontloaded on my last 2 cycles and found it works a treat.
Size: 108 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 3</b>: Frontloading - is it necessary? :: Testosterone & Other Steroids   :: MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum"
5. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-06-27 12:38:00)  by Squill
Like said, its a personal choice, some people use orals from a few weeks, others (like I will be doing on my next cycle) double up for the first shots
Size: 194 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 4</b>: Frontloading - is it necessary? :: Testosterone & Other Steroids   :: MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum"
6. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-06-27 14:20:00)  by D MOB
I would only ever frontload now, your straight into your cycle by the end of week two. (in reply to davidacarrick )
Size: 241 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 5</b>: Frontloading - is it necessary? :: Testosterone & Other Steroids   :: MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum"
7. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-06-27 14:35:00)  by davidacarrick
So instead of doing (for instance this is not my next cycle): 4 weeks dianabol at 100mg a day 8 weeks sust at 1000mg a week You would not take dianabol and do: week 1 - 2000mg sust week 2-8 - 1000mg sust is that right?> (in reply to davidacarrick )
Size: 441 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 6</b>: Frontloading - is it necessary? :: Testosterone & Other Steroids   :: MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum"
8. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-06-27 16:16:00)  by goodcat
ouch thats a lot of sust m8? how many cycles u got under ur belt? as for frontloading, i frontloaded my last cycle with 1000mg test then 500mg/week there after. personally i didnt feel much of a difference and wouldnt do it again. kept getting hot flushes and skin was going a reddish colour due to the extra blood. i dont think 1000mg would made much more difference to doing 750mg. IMO anyway. ...
Size: 506 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 7</b>: Frontloading - is it necessary? :: Testosterone & Other Steroids   :: MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum"
9. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-06-27 16:20:00)  by rightyho
Frontloading makes very little difference. Its main use is if you are time-constrained on your cycle - ie have to finish it by a given date to clear a drugs test, for instance. Going to the trouble of getting in orals, or fast-acting injections, or simply doubling up on initial doses makes very little difference. Even sustanon gets to work the second you inject it - it doesn't switch ...
Size: 603 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 8</b>: Frontloading - is it necessary? :: Testosterone & Other Steroids   :: MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum"
10. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-06-27 16:21:00)  by rightyho
quote: ORIGINAL: davidacarrick So instead of doing (for instance this is not my next cycle): 4 weeks dianabol at 100mg a day 8 weeks sust at 1000mg a week You would not take dianabol and do: week 1 - 2000mg sust week 2-8 - 1000mg sust is that right?> If you're 240lb in condition.
Size: 582 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 9</b>: Frontloading - is it necessary? :: Testosterone & Other Steroids   :: MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum"
 

Top contributing authors for Frontloading - is it necessary?

Name Posts
Bigfella 6
goodcat 6
carl19 5
rightyho 4
CheeseOnToast 3
Papa Lazarou 2
davidacarrick 2
angelfan 1
wilybean 1
stewedw 1